"You would if you loved me": Toward an improved conceptual and etiological understanding of nonphysical male sexual coercion

Sarah DeGue, David DiLillo

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper reviews current research regarding the prevalence and possible etiological factors associated with male sexual coercion, defined here as a class of inappropriate male behaviors in which nonphysical tactics (e.g., verbal pressure, lying, deceit, and continual arguments) are utilized to obtain sexual contact with an unwilling adult female. This form of sexual misconduct is contrasted with sexual aggression (i.e., forcible rape), in which the threat or use of physical force is utilized to gain sexual contact. A conceptual framework for understanding and examining sexual coercion within the broader context of male sexual misconduct is offered. This model consists of two primary dimensions: (1) types of sexual contact and (2) tactics for obtaining sexual contact, which intersect to form quadrants representing distinct categories of sexual misconduct. The broader sexual misconduct literature is utilized to shed light on possible predictors and etiological factors associated specifically with sexual coercion. These factors fall into four categories: (1) attitudinal or belief systems, (2) behavioral tendencies, (3) personality characteristics, and (4) childhood abuse experiences. Literature in each of these areas is reviewed and discussed. Finally, methodological and conceptual considerations for sexual misconduct research are presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)513-532
Number of pages20
JournalAggression and Violent Behavior
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Coercion
contact
Scientific Misconduct
tactics
Rape
Aggression
Personality
rape
aggression
Pressure
personality
abuse
childhood
threat
Research
experience
literature

Keywords

  • Date rape
  • Sexual aggression
  • Sexual assault
  • Sexual coercion
  • Sexual misconduct
  • Verbal coercion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

"You would if you loved me" : Toward an improved conceptual and etiological understanding of nonphysical male sexual coercion. / DeGue, Sarah; DiLillo, David.

In: Aggression and Violent Behavior, Vol. 10, No. 4, 01.01.2005, p. 513-532.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{272ca3cb2c7341a5ae892df64296f4f9,
title = "{"}You would if you loved me{"}: Toward an improved conceptual and etiological understanding of nonphysical male sexual coercion",
abstract = "This paper reviews current research regarding the prevalence and possible etiological factors associated with male sexual coercion, defined here as a class of inappropriate male behaviors in which nonphysical tactics (e.g., verbal pressure, lying, deceit, and continual arguments) are utilized to obtain sexual contact with an unwilling adult female. This form of sexual misconduct is contrasted with sexual aggression (i.e., forcible rape), in which the threat or use of physical force is utilized to gain sexual contact. A conceptual framework for understanding and examining sexual coercion within the broader context of male sexual misconduct is offered. This model consists of two primary dimensions: (1) types of sexual contact and (2) tactics for obtaining sexual contact, which intersect to form quadrants representing distinct categories of sexual misconduct. The broader sexual misconduct literature is utilized to shed light on possible predictors and etiological factors associated specifically with sexual coercion. These factors fall into four categories: (1) attitudinal or belief systems, (2) behavioral tendencies, (3) personality characteristics, and (4) childhood abuse experiences. Literature in each of these areas is reviewed and discussed. Finally, methodological and conceptual considerations for sexual misconduct research are presented.",
keywords = "Date rape, Sexual aggression, Sexual assault, Sexual coercion, Sexual misconduct, Verbal coercion",
author = "Sarah DeGue and David DiLillo",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.avb.2004.09.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "513--532",
journal = "Aggression and Violent Behavior",
issn = "1359-1789",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "You would if you loved me"

T2 - Toward an improved conceptual and etiological understanding of nonphysical male sexual coercion

AU - DeGue, Sarah

AU - DiLillo, David

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - This paper reviews current research regarding the prevalence and possible etiological factors associated with male sexual coercion, defined here as a class of inappropriate male behaviors in which nonphysical tactics (e.g., verbal pressure, lying, deceit, and continual arguments) are utilized to obtain sexual contact with an unwilling adult female. This form of sexual misconduct is contrasted with sexual aggression (i.e., forcible rape), in which the threat or use of physical force is utilized to gain sexual contact. A conceptual framework for understanding and examining sexual coercion within the broader context of male sexual misconduct is offered. This model consists of two primary dimensions: (1) types of sexual contact and (2) tactics for obtaining sexual contact, which intersect to form quadrants representing distinct categories of sexual misconduct. The broader sexual misconduct literature is utilized to shed light on possible predictors and etiological factors associated specifically with sexual coercion. These factors fall into four categories: (1) attitudinal or belief systems, (2) behavioral tendencies, (3) personality characteristics, and (4) childhood abuse experiences. Literature in each of these areas is reviewed and discussed. Finally, methodological and conceptual considerations for sexual misconduct research are presented.

AB - This paper reviews current research regarding the prevalence and possible etiological factors associated with male sexual coercion, defined here as a class of inappropriate male behaviors in which nonphysical tactics (e.g., verbal pressure, lying, deceit, and continual arguments) are utilized to obtain sexual contact with an unwilling adult female. This form of sexual misconduct is contrasted with sexual aggression (i.e., forcible rape), in which the threat or use of physical force is utilized to gain sexual contact. A conceptual framework for understanding and examining sexual coercion within the broader context of male sexual misconduct is offered. This model consists of two primary dimensions: (1) types of sexual contact and (2) tactics for obtaining sexual contact, which intersect to form quadrants representing distinct categories of sexual misconduct. The broader sexual misconduct literature is utilized to shed light on possible predictors and etiological factors associated specifically with sexual coercion. These factors fall into four categories: (1) attitudinal or belief systems, (2) behavioral tendencies, (3) personality characteristics, and (4) childhood abuse experiences. Literature in each of these areas is reviewed and discussed. Finally, methodological and conceptual considerations for sexual misconduct research are presented.

KW - Date rape

KW - Sexual aggression

KW - Sexual assault

KW - Sexual coercion

KW - Sexual misconduct

KW - Verbal coercion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17144394482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17144394482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.avb.2004.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.avb.2004.09.001

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:17144394482

VL - 10

SP - 513

EP - 532

JO - Aggression and Violent Behavior

JF - Aggression and Violent Behavior

SN - 1359-1789

IS - 4

ER -