Written content indicators of problematic approach behavior toward political officials

Katherine A. Schoeneman, Mario J Scalora, Charles D. Darrow, Julia E. Mclawsen, Grace H. Chang, William J. Zimmerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Those charged with assessing and managing threatening communications must utilize risk factors that are behavioral, operational, and reasonably attainable during investigations. This project examined 326 written correspondence cases of an inappropriate, disruptive, or threatening nature that targeted political officials, with the specific goal of identifying written content indicators of problematic approach behavior. Results revealed that subjects who engaged in problematic approach activity toward their targets had more criminal history, past threat assessment activity, familiarity with firearms, past substance use, and indicators of serious mental illness. Approachers were more likely to engage in multiple contact methods, target dispersion, more overall contacts, and prior contact with their target. Numerous content themes were associated with future problematic approach, including longer handwritten correspondence, referencing specific events, making demands, mentioning stressors, focus on personal themes, feeling their rights were violated, and expressing an intention to approach. Harassing, insulting, and threatening language was not related to approach behavior. The implications of these findings are wide-ranging for the practice of threat assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)284-301
Number of pages18
JournalBehavioral Sciences and the Law
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011

Fingerprint

Choice Behavior
contact
Firearms
threat
Emotions
Language
Communication
mental illness
communications
event
history
language
Recognition (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Cite this

Schoeneman, K. A., Scalora, M. J., Darrow, C. D., Mclawsen, J. E., Chang, G. H., & Zimmerman, W. J. (2011). Written content indicators of problematic approach behavior toward political officials. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 29(2), 284-301. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.977

Written content indicators of problematic approach behavior toward political officials. / Schoeneman, Katherine A.; Scalora, Mario J; Darrow, Charles D.; Mclawsen, Julia E.; Chang, Grace H.; Zimmerman, William J.

In: Behavioral Sciences and the Law, Vol. 29, No. 2, 01.03.2011, p. 284-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schoeneman, KA, Scalora, MJ, Darrow, CD, Mclawsen, JE, Chang, GH & Zimmerman, WJ 2011, 'Written content indicators of problematic approach behavior toward political officials', Behavioral Sciences and the Law, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 284-301. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.977
Schoeneman, Katherine A. ; Scalora, Mario J ; Darrow, Charles D. ; Mclawsen, Julia E. ; Chang, Grace H. ; Zimmerman, William J. / Written content indicators of problematic approach behavior toward political officials. In: Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 2011 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 284-301.
@article{293ffffeae52405197ee2c8b6c7c34f3,
title = "Written content indicators of problematic approach behavior toward political officials",
abstract = "Those charged with assessing and managing threatening communications must utilize risk factors that are behavioral, operational, and reasonably attainable during investigations. This project examined 326 written correspondence cases of an inappropriate, disruptive, or threatening nature that targeted political officials, with the specific goal of identifying written content indicators of problematic approach behavior. Results revealed that subjects who engaged in problematic approach activity toward their targets had more criminal history, past threat assessment activity, familiarity with firearms, past substance use, and indicators of serious mental illness. Approachers were more likely to engage in multiple contact methods, target dispersion, more overall contacts, and prior contact with their target. Numerous content themes were associated with future problematic approach, including longer handwritten correspondence, referencing specific events, making demands, mentioning stressors, focus on personal themes, feeling their rights were violated, and expressing an intention to approach. Harassing, insulting, and threatening language was not related to approach behavior. The implications of these findings are wide-ranging for the practice of threat assessment.",
author = "Schoeneman, {Katherine A.} and Scalora, {Mario J} and Darrow, {Charles D.} and Mclawsen, {Julia E.} and Chang, {Grace H.} and Zimmerman, {William J.}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/bsl.977",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "284--301",
journal = "Behavioral Sciences and the Law",
issn = "0735-3936",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Written content indicators of problematic approach behavior toward political officials

AU - Schoeneman, Katherine A.

AU - Scalora, Mario J

AU - Darrow, Charles D.

AU - Mclawsen, Julia E.

AU - Chang, Grace H.

AU - Zimmerman, William J.

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - Those charged with assessing and managing threatening communications must utilize risk factors that are behavioral, operational, and reasonably attainable during investigations. This project examined 326 written correspondence cases of an inappropriate, disruptive, or threatening nature that targeted political officials, with the specific goal of identifying written content indicators of problematic approach behavior. Results revealed that subjects who engaged in problematic approach activity toward their targets had more criminal history, past threat assessment activity, familiarity with firearms, past substance use, and indicators of serious mental illness. Approachers were more likely to engage in multiple contact methods, target dispersion, more overall contacts, and prior contact with their target. Numerous content themes were associated with future problematic approach, including longer handwritten correspondence, referencing specific events, making demands, mentioning stressors, focus on personal themes, feeling their rights were violated, and expressing an intention to approach. Harassing, insulting, and threatening language was not related to approach behavior. The implications of these findings are wide-ranging for the practice of threat assessment.

AB - Those charged with assessing and managing threatening communications must utilize risk factors that are behavioral, operational, and reasonably attainable during investigations. This project examined 326 written correspondence cases of an inappropriate, disruptive, or threatening nature that targeted political officials, with the specific goal of identifying written content indicators of problematic approach behavior. Results revealed that subjects who engaged in problematic approach activity toward their targets had more criminal history, past threat assessment activity, familiarity with firearms, past substance use, and indicators of serious mental illness. Approachers were more likely to engage in multiple contact methods, target dispersion, more overall contacts, and prior contact with their target. Numerous content themes were associated with future problematic approach, including longer handwritten correspondence, referencing specific events, making demands, mentioning stressors, focus on personal themes, feeling their rights were violated, and expressing an intention to approach. Harassing, insulting, and threatening language was not related to approach behavior. The implications of these findings are wide-ranging for the practice of threat assessment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953031272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953031272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bsl.977

DO - 10.1002/bsl.977

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 284

EP - 301

JO - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

JF - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

SN - 0735-3936

IS - 2

ER -