Wordlikeness and word learning in children with hearing loss

Derek J. Stiles, Karla McGregor, Ruth A. Bentler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The more a novel word conforms to the phonotactics of the language, the more wordlike it is and the easier it is to learn. It is unknown to what extent children with hearing loss (CHL) take advantage of phonotactic cues to support word learning. Aims This study investigated whether CHL had similar sensitivities to wordlikeness during a word-learning task as children with normal hearing (CNH). Methods & Procedures Sixteen CHL and 24 CNH participated in a novel word-learning task. Novel words varied by English wordlikeness. Recall was tested using a forced-choice identification task wherein foils for each trial related semantically, lexically or not at all. Receptive vocabulary and working memory were also assessed. Outcomes & Results All children were able to identify high wordlike novel words more accurately than low wordlike novel words. The number of errors on identification of words that were moderate in wordlikeness was inversely correlated to vocabulary size (not working memory) and CHL had smaller vocabularies than CNH. When in error, CHL were more likely than CNH to select a semantically related foil. Conclusions & Implications Although they are sensitive to extremes in wordlikeness, compared with their peers with normal hearing, CHL present with subtle differences in word learning. Clinical implications for exploiting wordlikeness in service of word learning assessment and intervention are presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)200-206
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Language and Communication Disorders
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2013

Fingerprint

Hearing Loss
Learning
learning
Hearing
Vocabulary
vocabulary
Short-Term Memory
Hearing Impairment
Word Learning
Cues
Language
Novel Words
present

Keywords

  • children
  • fast-mapping
  • hearing impairment
  • lexicon
  • vocabulary

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Wordlikeness and word learning in children with hearing loss. / Stiles, Derek J.; McGregor, Karla; Bentler, Ruth A.

In: International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, Vol. 48, No. 2, 01.03.2013, p. 200-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4a4f803f7b37480b8a38e912ec4625cd,
title = "Wordlikeness and word learning in children with hearing loss",
abstract = "Background The more a novel word conforms to the phonotactics of the language, the more wordlike it is and the easier it is to learn. It is unknown to what extent children with hearing loss (CHL) take advantage of phonotactic cues to support word learning. Aims This study investigated whether CHL had similar sensitivities to wordlikeness during a word-learning task as children with normal hearing (CNH). Methods & Procedures Sixteen CHL and 24 CNH participated in a novel word-learning task. Novel words varied by English wordlikeness. Recall was tested using a forced-choice identification task wherein foils for each trial related semantically, lexically or not at all. Receptive vocabulary and working memory were also assessed. Outcomes & Results All children were able to identify high wordlike novel words more accurately than low wordlike novel words. The number of errors on identification of words that were moderate in wordlikeness was inversely correlated to vocabulary size (not working memory) and CHL had smaller vocabularies than CNH. When in error, CHL were more likely than CNH to select a semantically related foil. Conclusions & Implications Although they are sensitive to extremes in wordlikeness, compared with their peers with normal hearing, CHL present with subtle differences in word learning. Clinical implications for exploiting wordlikeness in service of word learning assessment and intervention are presented.",
keywords = "children, fast-mapping, hearing impairment, lexicon, vocabulary",
author = "Stiles, {Derek J.} and Karla McGregor and Bentler, {Ruth A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00199.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "200--206",
journal = "International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders",
issn = "1368-2822",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wordlikeness and word learning in children with hearing loss

AU - Stiles, Derek J.

AU - McGregor, Karla

AU - Bentler, Ruth A.

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - Background The more a novel word conforms to the phonotactics of the language, the more wordlike it is and the easier it is to learn. It is unknown to what extent children with hearing loss (CHL) take advantage of phonotactic cues to support word learning. Aims This study investigated whether CHL had similar sensitivities to wordlikeness during a word-learning task as children with normal hearing (CNH). Methods & Procedures Sixteen CHL and 24 CNH participated in a novel word-learning task. Novel words varied by English wordlikeness. Recall was tested using a forced-choice identification task wherein foils for each trial related semantically, lexically or not at all. Receptive vocabulary and working memory were also assessed. Outcomes & Results All children were able to identify high wordlike novel words more accurately than low wordlike novel words. The number of errors on identification of words that were moderate in wordlikeness was inversely correlated to vocabulary size (not working memory) and CHL had smaller vocabularies than CNH. When in error, CHL were more likely than CNH to select a semantically related foil. Conclusions & Implications Although they are sensitive to extremes in wordlikeness, compared with their peers with normal hearing, CHL present with subtle differences in word learning. Clinical implications for exploiting wordlikeness in service of word learning assessment and intervention are presented.

AB - Background The more a novel word conforms to the phonotactics of the language, the more wordlike it is and the easier it is to learn. It is unknown to what extent children with hearing loss (CHL) take advantage of phonotactic cues to support word learning. Aims This study investigated whether CHL had similar sensitivities to wordlikeness during a word-learning task as children with normal hearing (CNH). Methods & Procedures Sixteen CHL and 24 CNH participated in a novel word-learning task. Novel words varied by English wordlikeness. Recall was tested using a forced-choice identification task wherein foils for each trial related semantically, lexically or not at all. Receptive vocabulary and working memory were also assessed. Outcomes & Results All children were able to identify high wordlike novel words more accurately than low wordlike novel words. The number of errors on identification of words that were moderate in wordlikeness was inversely correlated to vocabulary size (not working memory) and CHL had smaller vocabularies than CNH. When in error, CHL were more likely than CNH to select a semantically related foil. Conclusions & Implications Although they are sensitive to extremes in wordlikeness, compared with their peers with normal hearing, CHL present with subtle differences in word learning. Clinical implications for exploiting wordlikeness in service of word learning assessment and intervention are presented.

KW - children

KW - fast-mapping

KW - hearing impairment

KW - lexicon

KW - vocabulary

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874910589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874910589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00199.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00199.x

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 200

EP - 206

JO - International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders

JF - International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders

SN - 1368-2822

IS - 2

ER -