Wideband reflectance tympanometry in chinchillas and humans

Robert H. Margolis, Saurav Paul, George L. Saly, Patricia A. Schachern, Douglas H Keefe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Wideband reflectance tympanometry was performed on twelve chinchillas ears. The complex input impedance of the middle ear, multifrequency admittance tympanograms, reflectance patterns (reflectance versus frequency, and reflectance tympanograms (reflectance versus ear-canal air pressure) were analyzed and compared to human data. The complex impedance of the chinchilla ear has a lower stiffness reactance at low frequencies, a higher mass reactance at high frequencies, and a lower resistance compared to the human. Multifrequency admittance tympanograms from chinchillas follow the same sequence of patterns as humans for low frequencies (<2 kHz). At higher frequencies tympanograms from both species are poorly organized and do not follow a consistent sequence of patterns. Reflectance patterns of chinchillas and humans are different. However, both species show high reflectance at low frequencies, regions of lower reflectance in mid-frequencies (2-6 kHz), and high reflectance at high frequencies (>8 kHz). Reflectance tympanograms for the two species show a single, centrally located minimum at low frequencies (<2 kHz) and are substantially different at higher frequencies. Results are shown for two animals that underwent eustachian tube obstruction. Reflectance patterns obtained with different ear-canal air pressures are substantially different. Reflectance results at any single ear-canal pressure (including ambient pressure) do not completely characterize the effects of middle-ear pathology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1453-1464
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume110
Issue number3 I
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 22 2001

Fingerprint

broadband
ear
reflectance
canals
middle ear
reactance
electrical impedance
low frequencies
eustachian tubes
impedance
Reflectance
air
low resistance
pathology
animals
stiffness
Ear
Canals
Air
Middle Ear

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Wideband reflectance tympanometry in chinchillas and humans. / Margolis, Robert H.; Paul, Saurav; Saly, George L.; Schachern, Patricia A.; Keefe, Douglas H.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 110, No. 3 I, 22.09.2001, p. 1453-1464.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Margolis, Robert H. ; Paul, Saurav ; Saly, George L. ; Schachern, Patricia A. ; Keefe, Douglas H. / Wideband reflectance tympanometry in chinchillas and humans. In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2001 ; Vol. 110, No. 3 I. pp. 1453-1464.
@article{103011305ad9414c8cd06653fd70bf26,
title = "Wideband reflectance tympanometry in chinchillas and humans",
abstract = "Wideband reflectance tympanometry was performed on twelve chinchillas ears. The complex input impedance of the middle ear, multifrequency admittance tympanograms, reflectance patterns (reflectance versus frequency, and reflectance tympanograms (reflectance versus ear-canal air pressure) were analyzed and compared to human data. The complex impedance of the chinchilla ear has a lower stiffness reactance at low frequencies, a higher mass reactance at high frequencies, and a lower resistance compared to the human. Multifrequency admittance tympanograms from chinchillas follow the same sequence of patterns as humans for low frequencies (<2 kHz). At higher frequencies tympanograms from both species are poorly organized and do not follow a consistent sequence of patterns. Reflectance patterns of chinchillas and humans are different. However, both species show high reflectance at low frequencies, regions of lower reflectance in mid-frequencies (2-6 kHz), and high reflectance at high frequencies (>8 kHz). Reflectance tympanograms for the two species show a single, centrally located minimum at low frequencies (<2 kHz) and are substantially different at higher frequencies. Results are shown for two animals that underwent eustachian tube obstruction. Reflectance patterns obtained with different ear-canal air pressures are substantially different. Reflectance results at any single ear-canal pressure (including ambient pressure) do not completely characterize the effects of middle-ear pathology.",
author = "Margolis, {Robert H.} and Saurav Paul and Saly, {George L.} and Schachern, {Patricia A.} and Keefe, {Douglas H}",
year = "2001",
month = "9",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1121/1.1394219",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "110",
pages = "1453--1464",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "3 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wideband reflectance tympanometry in chinchillas and humans

AU - Margolis, Robert H.

AU - Paul, Saurav

AU - Saly, George L.

AU - Schachern, Patricia A.

AU - Keefe, Douglas H

PY - 2001/9/22

Y1 - 2001/9/22

N2 - Wideband reflectance tympanometry was performed on twelve chinchillas ears. The complex input impedance of the middle ear, multifrequency admittance tympanograms, reflectance patterns (reflectance versus frequency, and reflectance tympanograms (reflectance versus ear-canal air pressure) were analyzed and compared to human data. The complex impedance of the chinchilla ear has a lower stiffness reactance at low frequencies, a higher mass reactance at high frequencies, and a lower resistance compared to the human. Multifrequency admittance tympanograms from chinchillas follow the same sequence of patterns as humans for low frequencies (<2 kHz). At higher frequencies tympanograms from both species are poorly organized and do not follow a consistent sequence of patterns. Reflectance patterns of chinchillas and humans are different. However, both species show high reflectance at low frequencies, regions of lower reflectance in mid-frequencies (2-6 kHz), and high reflectance at high frequencies (>8 kHz). Reflectance tympanograms for the two species show a single, centrally located minimum at low frequencies (<2 kHz) and are substantially different at higher frequencies. Results are shown for two animals that underwent eustachian tube obstruction. Reflectance patterns obtained with different ear-canal air pressures are substantially different. Reflectance results at any single ear-canal pressure (including ambient pressure) do not completely characterize the effects of middle-ear pathology.

AB - Wideband reflectance tympanometry was performed on twelve chinchillas ears. The complex input impedance of the middle ear, multifrequency admittance tympanograms, reflectance patterns (reflectance versus frequency, and reflectance tympanograms (reflectance versus ear-canal air pressure) were analyzed and compared to human data. The complex impedance of the chinchilla ear has a lower stiffness reactance at low frequencies, a higher mass reactance at high frequencies, and a lower resistance compared to the human. Multifrequency admittance tympanograms from chinchillas follow the same sequence of patterns as humans for low frequencies (<2 kHz). At higher frequencies tympanograms from both species are poorly organized and do not follow a consistent sequence of patterns. Reflectance patterns of chinchillas and humans are different. However, both species show high reflectance at low frequencies, regions of lower reflectance in mid-frequencies (2-6 kHz), and high reflectance at high frequencies (>8 kHz). Reflectance tympanograms for the two species show a single, centrally located minimum at low frequencies (<2 kHz) and are substantially different at higher frequencies. Results are shown for two animals that underwent eustachian tube obstruction. Reflectance patterns obtained with different ear-canal air pressures are substantially different. Reflectance results at any single ear-canal pressure (including ambient pressure) do not completely characterize the effects of middle-ear pathology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034838885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034838885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.1394219

DO - 10.1121/1.1394219

M3 - Article

VL - 110

SP - 1453

EP - 1464

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 3 I

ER -