Why Radicalization Fails: Barriers to Mass Casualty Terrorism

Peter G Simi, Steven Windisch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Few issues have garnered as much attention in recent years as the topic of violent extremism (VE). Although substantial attention has been devoted to investigating the radicalization process, few scholars have examined the obstacles that hinder VE radicalization. Based on in-depth life history interviews, the current study examines five types of barriers that hinder radicalization toward mass casualty violence (MCV): mass casualty violence as counter-productive; preference toward interpersonal violence, changes in focus and availability; internal organizational conflict; and moral apprehension. In general, we address each barrier’s unique contribution to hindering the likelihood of MCV. Finally, we discuss how our findings could be used as part of initiatives aimed at countering violent extremism (CVE).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalTerrorism and Political Violence
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 8 2018

Fingerprint

radicalization
Terrorism
radicalism
terrorism
violence
Availability
Violence
interview

Keywords

  • extremism
  • radicalization
  • terrorism
  • violence
  • white supremacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Safety Research
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Why Radicalization Fails : Barriers to Mass Casualty Terrorism. / Simi, Peter G; Windisch, Steven.

In: Terrorism and Political Violence, 08.01.2018, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b98b0e786a634642a22200d16c1f8362,
title = "Why Radicalization Fails: Barriers to Mass Casualty Terrorism",
abstract = "Few issues have garnered as much attention in recent years as the topic of violent extremism (VE). Although substantial attention has been devoted to investigating the radicalization process, few scholars have examined the obstacles that hinder VE radicalization. Based on in-depth life history interviews, the current study examines five types of barriers that hinder radicalization toward mass casualty violence (MCV): mass casualty violence as counter-productive; preference toward interpersonal violence, changes in focus and availability; internal organizational conflict; and moral apprehension. In general, we address each barrier’s unique contribution to hindering the likelihood of MCV. Finally, we discuss how our findings could be used as part of initiatives aimed at countering violent extremism (CVE).",
keywords = "extremism, radicalization, terrorism, violence, white supremacy",
author = "Simi, {Peter G} and Steven Windisch",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1080/09546553.2017.1409212",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Terrorism and Political Violence",
issn = "0954-6553",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Radicalization Fails

T2 - Barriers to Mass Casualty Terrorism

AU - Simi, Peter G

AU - Windisch, Steven

PY - 2018/1/8

Y1 - 2018/1/8

N2 - Few issues have garnered as much attention in recent years as the topic of violent extremism (VE). Although substantial attention has been devoted to investigating the radicalization process, few scholars have examined the obstacles that hinder VE radicalization. Based on in-depth life history interviews, the current study examines five types of barriers that hinder radicalization toward mass casualty violence (MCV): mass casualty violence as counter-productive; preference toward interpersonal violence, changes in focus and availability; internal organizational conflict; and moral apprehension. In general, we address each barrier’s unique contribution to hindering the likelihood of MCV. Finally, we discuss how our findings could be used as part of initiatives aimed at countering violent extremism (CVE).

AB - Few issues have garnered as much attention in recent years as the topic of violent extremism (VE). Although substantial attention has been devoted to investigating the radicalization process, few scholars have examined the obstacles that hinder VE radicalization. Based on in-depth life history interviews, the current study examines five types of barriers that hinder radicalization toward mass casualty violence (MCV): mass casualty violence as counter-productive; preference toward interpersonal violence, changes in focus and availability; internal organizational conflict; and moral apprehension. In general, we address each barrier’s unique contribution to hindering the likelihood of MCV. Finally, we discuss how our findings could be used as part of initiatives aimed at countering violent extremism (CVE).

KW - extremism

KW - radicalization

KW - terrorism

KW - violence

KW - white supremacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041013310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041013310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09546553.2017.1409212

DO - 10.1080/09546553.2017.1409212

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85041013310

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Terrorism and Political Violence

JF - Terrorism and Political Violence

SN - 0954-6553

ER -