Why do cell phone interviews last longer?

A behavior coding perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Why do telephone interviews last longer on cell phones than landline phones? Common explanations for this phenomenon include differential selection into subsets of questions, activities outside the question-answer sequence (such as collecting contact information for cell-minute reimbursement), respondent characteristics, behaviors indicating disruption to respondents' perception and comprehension, and behaviors indicating interviewer reactions to disruption. We find that the time difference persists even when we focus only on the questionanswer portion of the interview and only on shared questions (i.e., eliminating the first two explanations above). To learn why the difference persists, we use behavior codes from the U.S./Japan Newspaper Opinion Poll, a dual-frame telephone survey of US adults, to examine indicators of satisficing, line-quality issues, and distraction. Overall, we find that respondents on cell phones are more disrupted, and that the difference in interview duration occurs because cell phone respondents take longer to provide acceptable answers. Interviewers also slow their speed of speech when asking questions. A slower speaking rate from both actors results in a longer and more expensive interview when respondents use cell phones.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)553-582
Number of pages30
JournalPublic Opinion Quarterly
Volume82
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

cell phone
Telephone
coding
interview
telephone
opinion poll
telephone interview
speaking
newspaper
comprehension
Japan
Cell Phone
contact
Disruption

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Why do cell phone interviews last longer? A behavior coding perspective. / Timbrook, Jerry; Olson, Kristen M; Smyth, Jolene D.

In: Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 82, No. 3, 01.01.2018, p. 553-582.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9b1aea2665db4bc6bc5ca0eb1f56aa6b,
title = "Why do cell phone interviews last longer?: A behavior coding perspective",
abstract = "Why do telephone interviews last longer on cell phones than landline phones? Common explanations for this phenomenon include differential selection into subsets of questions, activities outside the question-answer sequence (such as collecting contact information for cell-minute reimbursement), respondent characteristics, behaviors indicating disruption to respondents' perception and comprehension, and behaviors indicating interviewer reactions to disruption. We find that the time difference persists even when we focus only on the questionanswer portion of the interview and only on shared questions (i.e., eliminating the first two explanations above). To learn why the difference persists, we use behavior codes from the U.S./Japan Newspaper Opinion Poll, a dual-frame telephone survey of US adults, to examine indicators of satisficing, line-quality issues, and distraction. Overall, we find that respondents on cell phones are more disrupted, and that the difference in interview duration occurs because cell phone respondents take longer to provide acceptable answers. Interviewers also slow their speed of speech when asking questions. A slower speaking rate from both actors results in a longer and more expensive interview when respondents use cell phones.",
author = "Jerry Timbrook and Olson, {Kristen M} and Smyth, {Jolene D}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/poq/nfy022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "553--582",
journal = "Public Opinion Quarterly",
issn = "0033-362X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why do cell phone interviews last longer?

T2 - A behavior coding perspective

AU - Timbrook, Jerry

AU - Olson, Kristen M

AU - Smyth, Jolene D

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Why do telephone interviews last longer on cell phones than landline phones? Common explanations for this phenomenon include differential selection into subsets of questions, activities outside the question-answer sequence (such as collecting contact information for cell-minute reimbursement), respondent characteristics, behaviors indicating disruption to respondents' perception and comprehension, and behaviors indicating interviewer reactions to disruption. We find that the time difference persists even when we focus only on the questionanswer portion of the interview and only on shared questions (i.e., eliminating the first two explanations above). To learn why the difference persists, we use behavior codes from the U.S./Japan Newspaper Opinion Poll, a dual-frame telephone survey of US adults, to examine indicators of satisficing, line-quality issues, and distraction. Overall, we find that respondents on cell phones are more disrupted, and that the difference in interview duration occurs because cell phone respondents take longer to provide acceptable answers. Interviewers also slow their speed of speech when asking questions. A slower speaking rate from both actors results in a longer and more expensive interview when respondents use cell phones.

AB - Why do telephone interviews last longer on cell phones than landline phones? Common explanations for this phenomenon include differential selection into subsets of questions, activities outside the question-answer sequence (such as collecting contact information for cell-minute reimbursement), respondent characteristics, behaviors indicating disruption to respondents' perception and comprehension, and behaviors indicating interviewer reactions to disruption. We find that the time difference persists even when we focus only on the questionanswer portion of the interview and only on shared questions (i.e., eliminating the first two explanations above). To learn why the difference persists, we use behavior codes from the U.S./Japan Newspaper Opinion Poll, a dual-frame telephone survey of US adults, to examine indicators of satisficing, line-quality issues, and distraction. Overall, we find that respondents on cell phones are more disrupted, and that the difference in interview duration occurs because cell phone respondents take longer to provide acceptable answers. Interviewers also slow their speed of speech when asking questions. A slower speaking rate from both actors results in a longer and more expensive interview when respondents use cell phones.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058090259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058090259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/poq/nfy022

DO - 10.1093/poq/nfy022

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 553

EP - 582

JO - Public Opinion Quarterly

JF - Public Opinion Quarterly

SN - 0033-362X

IS - 3

ER -