Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation

Jeffrey R Stevens, Marc D. Hauser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

268 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Animals often aid others without gaining any immediate benefits. Although these acts seem to reduce the donor's fitness, they are only apparently altruistic. Donors typically help because they or their kin receive future benefits or avoid costly punishment. Reciprocal altruism - alternating the roles of donor and recipient - has been a well-studied form of cooperation among non-kin because of its intuitive appeal in explaining human cooperation. Despite immense theoretical interest, little empirical evidence substantiates the biological importance of reciprocal altruism in non-human animals. We propose that this is because psychological mechanisms constrain its application in cooperative contexts. In particular, we contend that cognitive limitations such as temporal discounting, numerical discrimination and memory make reciprocity difficult for animals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)60-65
Number of pages6
JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

Altruism
Psychology
Punishment
Delay Discounting
Discrimination (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. / Stevens, Jeffrey R; Hauser, Marc D.

In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 2, 01.01.2004, p. 60-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eb212ad213d4420889ed64d5ce448024,
title = "Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation",
abstract = "Animals often aid others without gaining any immediate benefits. Although these acts seem to reduce the donor's fitness, they are only apparently altruistic. Donors typically help because they or their kin receive future benefits or avoid costly punishment. Reciprocal altruism - alternating the roles of donor and recipient - has been a well-studied form of cooperation among non-kin because of its intuitive appeal in explaining human cooperation. Despite immense theoretical interest, little empirical evidence substantiates the biological importance of reciprocal altruism in non-human animals. We propose that this is because psychological mechanisms constrain its application in cooperative contexts. In particular, we contend that cognitive limitations such as temporal discounting, numerical discrimination and memory make reciprocity difficult for animals.",
author = "Stevens, {Jeffrey R} and Hauser, {Marc D.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "60--65",
journal = "Trends in Cognitive Sciences",
issn = "1364-6613",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation

AU - Stevens, Jeffrey R

AU - Hauser, Marc D.

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Animals often aid others without gaining any immediate benefits. Although these acts seem to reduce the donor's fitness, they are only apparently altruistic. Donors typically help because they or their kin receive future benefits or avoid costly punishment. Reciprocal altruism - alternating the roles of donor and recipient - has been a well-studied form of cooperation among non-kin because of its intuitive appeal in explaining human cooperation. Despite immense theoretical interest, little empirical evidence substantiates the biological importance of reciprocal altruism in non-human animals. We propose that this is because psychological mechanisms constrain its application in cooperative contexts. In particular, we contend that cognitive limitations such as temporal discounting, numerical discrimination and memory make reciprocity difficult for animals.

AB - Animals often aid others without gaining any immediate benefits. Although these acts seem to reduce the donor's fitness, they are only apparently altruistic. Donors typically help because they or their kin receive future benefits or avoid costly punishment. Reciprocal altruism - alternating the roles of donor and recipient - has been a well-studied form of cooperation among non-kin because of its intuitive appeal in explaining human cooperation. Despite immense theoretical interest, little empirical evidence substantiates the biological importance of reciprocal altruism in non-human animals. We propose that this is because psychological mechanisms constrain its application in cooperative contexts. In particular, we contend that cognitive limitations such as temporal discounting, numerical discrimination and memory make reciprocity difficult for animals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0842326544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0842326544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.003

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 60

EP - 65

JO - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

JF - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

SN - 1364-6613

IS - 2

ER -