Which is most sensitive? Assessing responses of mice and rats in toxicity bioassays

Jessica Kratchman, Bing Wang, George Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rodent species are commonly used in traditional toxicology testing guidelines to predict human health toxicity outcomes. The use of a consistent species in test guidelines is important for maintaining consistency and comparability between tests and testing guidelines. This recommendation was operationalized for this study as the implicit assumption of uniform species and species-sex sensitivities. This investigation analyzed the uniformity assumption using data from National Toxicology Program Technical Reports (and where applicable Toxicity Reports), which provide data from both short-term and chronic rodent toxicity tests. These data were extracted and modeled using the Environmental Protection Agency’s Benchmark Dose Software. Minimum best-fit benchmark doses (BMD) and benchmark dose lower limits (BMDL) were determined and a minimum best-fit BMD10 and BMDL10 estimated for every chemical and study duration. Endpoints of interest included non-neoplastic lesions, final mean body weights, and mean organ weights. The distribution of findings was then assessed to determine the most sensitive species and species-sex combinations associated with the minimum best-fit BMDL10. Data indicated that species and species-sex sensitivity for this group of chemicals is not uniform and that rats are significantly more sensitive than mice for non-cancerous outcomes observed, depending upon study duration. There are also indications that male rats may be more sensitive than other species-sex groups in certain situations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)173-183
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A: Current Issues
Volume81
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2018

Fingerprint

Bioassay
Benchmarking
Biological Assay
Toxicity
Rats
Guidelines
Toxicology
Rodentia
Chronic Toxicity Tests
Testing
Environmental protection
Organ Size
Conservation of Natural Resources
Health
Software
Body Weight

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Which is most sensitive? Assessing responses of mice and rats in toxicity bioassays. / Kratchman, Jessica; Wang, Bing; Gray, George.

In: Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A: Current Issues, Vol. 81, No. 7, 03.04.2018, p. 173-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8dd22a662b1e43368468a85854a40995,
title = "Which is most sensitive? Assessing responses of mice and rats in toxicity bioassays",
abstract = "Rodent species are commonly used in traditional toxicology testing guidelines to predict human health toxicity outcomes. The use of a consistent species in test guidelines is important for maintaining consistency and comparability between tests and testing guidelines. This recommendation was operationalized for this study as the implicit assumption of uniform species and species-sex sensitivities. This investigation analyzed the uniformity assumption using data from National Toxicology Program Technical Reports (and where applicable Toxicity Reports), which provide data from both short-term and chronic rodent toxicity tests. These data were extracted and modeled using the Environmental Protection Agency’s Benchmark Dose Software. Minimum best-fit benchmark doses (BMD) and benchmark dose lower limits (BMDL) were determined and a minimum best-fit BMD10 and BMDL10 estimated for every chemical and study duration. Endpoints of interest included non-neoplastic lesions, final mean body weights, and mean organ weights. The distribution of findings was then assessed to determine the most sensitive species and species-sex combinations associated with the minimum best-fit BMDL10. Data indicated that species and species-sex sensitivity for this group of chemicals is not uniform and that rats are significantly more sensitive than mice for non-cancerous outcomes observed, depending upon study duration. There are also indications that male rats may be more sensitive than other species-sex groups in certain situations.",
author = "Jessica Kratchman and Bing Wang and George Gray",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/15287394.2018.1423799",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "173--183",
journal = "Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A: Current Issues",
issn = "1528-7394",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Which is most sensitive? Assessing responses of mice and rats in toxicity bioassays

AU - Kratchman, Jessica

AU - Wang, Bing

AU - Gray, George

PY - 2018/4/3

Y1 - 2018/4/3

N2 - Rodent species are commonly used in traditional toxicology testing guidelines to predict human health toxicity outcomes. The use of a consistent species in test guidelines is important for maintaining consistency and comparability between tests and testing guidelines. This recommendation was operationalized for this study as the implicit assumption of uniform species and species-sex sensitivities. This investigation analyzed the uniformity assumption using data from National Toxicology Program Technical Reports (and where applicable Toxicity Reports), which provide data from both short-term and chronic rodent toxicity tests. These data were extracted and modeled using the Environmental Protection Agency’s Benchmark Dose Software. Minimum best-fit benchmark doses (BMD) and benchmark dose lower limits (BMDL) were determined and a minimum best-fit BMD10 and BMDL10 estimated for every chemical and study duration. Endpoints of interest included non-neoplastic lesions, final mean body weights, and mean organ weights. The distribution of findings was then assessed to determine the most sensitive species and species-sex combinations associated with the minimum best-fit BMDL10. Data indicated that species and species-sex sensitivity for this group of chemicals is not uniform and that rats are significantly more sensitive than mice for non-cancerous outcomes observed, depending upon study duration. There are also indications that male rats may be more sensitive than other species-sex groups in certain situations.

AB - Rodent species are commonly used in traditional toxicology testing guidelines to predict human health toxicity outcomes. The use of a consistent species in test guidelines is important for maintaining consistency and comparability between tests and testing guidelines. This recommendation was operationalized for this study as the implicit assumption of uniform species and species-sex sensitivities. This investigation analyzed the uniformity assumption using data from National Toxicology Program Technical Reports (and where applicable Toxicity Reports), which provide data from both short-term and chronic rodent toxicity tests. These data were extracted and modeled using the Environmental Protection Agency’s Benchmark Dose Software. Minimum best-fit benchmark doses (BMD) and benchmark dose lower limits (BMDL) were determined and a minimum best-fit BMD10 and BMDL10 estimated for every chemical and study duration. Endpoints of interest included non-neoplastic lesions, final mean body weights, and mean organ weights. The distribution of findings was then assessed to determine the most sensitive species and species-sex combinations associated with the minimum best-fit BMDL10. Data indicated that species and species-sex sensitivity for this group of chemicals is not uniform and that rats are significantly more sensitive than mice for non-cancerous outcomes observed, depending upon study duration. There are also indications that male rats may be more sensitive than other species-sex groups in certain situations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041576441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041576441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15287394.2018.1423799

DO - 10.1080/15287394.2018.1423799

M3 - Article

C2 - 29405849

AN - SCOPUS:85041576441

VL - 81

SP - 173

EP - 183

JO - Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A: Current Issues

JF - Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A: Current Issues

SN - 1528-7394

IS - 7

ER -