When are people interchangeable sexual objects? The effect of gender and body type on sexual fungibility

Sarah J. Gervais, Theresa K. Vescio, Jill Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to empirically examine the fungibility hypothesis derived from sexual objectification theory. Sexual objectification theorists have suggested that like objects, people, typically women, may be fungible or interchangeable with similar others. Despite its provocative nature and potential adverse psychological consequences, the fungibility hypothesis has yet to be empirically examined. We suggested that women, regardless of body types, but also men with body types that resemble the cultural ideal of attractiveness (e.g., large arms and chests and narrow waists), would be more fungible than men with body types that resemble the cultural average. Participants (n= 66) saw images of average and ideal women and men once before they completed a surprise matching task requiring that they match the bodies and faces that appeared together in the original images. Consistent with hypotheses, we found that women with ideal bodies, women with average bodies, and men with ideal bodies were more fungible (perceivers made more body-face pairing errors) than men with average bodies. Furthermore, it appears that when people are fungible they are interchangeable with people with similar body types. Implications and directions for future research on objectification and fungibility are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)499-513
Number of pages15
JournalBritish Journal of Social Psychology
Volume51
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

Fingerprint

Somatotypes
Arm
Thorax
Psychology
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

When are people interchangeable sexual objects? The effect of gender and body type on sexual fungibility. / Gervais, Sarah J.; Vescio, Theresa K.; Allen, Jill.

In: British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 4, 01.12.2012, p. 499-513.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b4cbf1301b154dcd98282ff6ad39b0a4,
title = "When are people interchangeable sexual objects? The effect of gender and body type on sexual fungibility",
abstract = "The purpose of this research was to empirically examine the fungibility hypothesis derived from sexual objectification theory. Sexual objectification theorists have suggested that like objects, people, typically women, may be fungible or interchangeable with similar others. Despite its provocative nature and potential adverse psychological consequences, the fungibility hypothesis has yet to be empirically examined. We suggested that women, regardless of body types, but also men with body types that resemble the cultural ideal of attractiveness (e.g., large arms and chests and narrow waists), would be more fungible than men with body types that resemble the cultural average. Participants (n= 66) saw images of average and ideal women and men once before they completed a surprise matching task requiring that they match the bodies and faces that appeared together in the original images. Consistent with hypotheses, we found that women with ideal bodies, women with average bodies, and men with ideal bodies were more fungible (perceivers made more body-face pairing errors) than men with average bodies. Furthermore, it appears that when people are fungible they are interchangeable with people with similar body types. Implications and directions for future research on objectification and fungibility are discussed.",
author = "Gervais, {Sarah J.} and Vescio, {Theresa K.} and Jill Allen",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02016.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "499--513",
journal = "British Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0144-6665",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When are people interchangeable sexual objects? The effect of gender and body type on sexual fungibility

AU - Gervais, Sarah J.

AU - Vescio, Theresa K.

AU - Allen, Jill

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - The purpose of this research was to empirically examine the fungibility hypothesis derived from sexual objectification theory. Sexual objectification theorists have suggested that like objects, people, typically women, may be fungible or interchangeable with similar others. Despite its provocative nature and potential adverse psychological consequences, the fungibility hypothesis has yet to be empirically examined. We suggested that women, regardless of body types, but also men with body types that resemble the cultural ideal of attractiveness (e.g., large arms and chests and narrow waists), would be more fungible than men with body types that resemble the cultural average. Participants (n= 66) saw images of average and ideal women and men once before they completed a surprise matching task requiring that they match the bodies and faces that appeared together in the original images. Consistent with hypotheses, we found that women with ideal bodies, women with average bodies, and men with ideal bodies were more fungible (perceivers made more body-face pairing errors) than men with average bodies. Furthermore, it appears that when people are fungible they are interchangeable with people with similar body types. Implications and directions for future research on objectification and fungibility are discussed.

AB - The purpose of this research was to empirically examine the fungibility hypothesis derived from sexual objectification theory. Sexual objectification theorists have suggested that like objects, people, typically women, may be fungible or interchangeable with similar others. Despite its provocative nature and potential adverse psychological consequences, the fungibility hypothesis has yet to be empirically examined. We suggested that women, regardless of body types, but also men with body types that resemble the cultural ideal of attractiveness (e.g., large arms and chests and narrow waists), would be more fungible than men with body types that resemble the cultural average. Participants (n= 66) saw images of average and ideal women and men once before they completed a surprise matching task requiring that they match the bodies and faces that appeared together in the original images. Consistent with hypotheses, we found that women with ideal bodies, women with average bodies, and men with ideal bodies were more fungible (perceivers made more body-face pairing errors) than men with average bodies. Furthermore, it appears that when people are fungible they are interchangeable with people with similar body types. Implications and directions for future research on objectification and fungibility are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870703156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870703156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02016.x

DO - 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02016.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 23216316

AN - SCOPUS:84870703156

VL - 51

SP - 499

EP - 513

JO - British Journal of Social Psychology

JF - British Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0144-6665

IS - 4

ER -