What makes the Mueller a liar

A multiple-cue approach

Pamela G. McClellan, Ira H. Bernstein, Calvin P Garbin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Subjects made magnitude estimations of fins-in and fins-out Mueller Lyer stimuli. Shaft length, fin length, and fin angle were within-subjects variables, and the sitmuli could be either conventional solid drawings or dot forms, a between-subjects variable. The parametric effects of these variables were similar to results previously obtained. However, principal emphasis was given to lens model and related multivariate analyses of the subjects' judgments. These analyses suggested that no single "critical" cue seemed to account for the illusion. Rather, various sets of cues could be formulated to simulate the subjects' judgmental behavior equivalently. In addition, field-independent subjects showed better knowledge of the cue structure than field-dependent subjects. In the main, subjects in this experiment performed like subjects have in tasks not involving visual illusions with multiple sources of information varying in their relevance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)234-244
Number of pages11
JournalPerception & Psychophysics
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 1984

Fingerprint

Cues
Lenses
Multivariate Analysis
Liar
source of information
Length
stimulus
experiment
Stimulus
Experiment
Conventional
Visual Illusion
Illusion
Magnitude Estimation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

McClellan, P. G., Bernstein, I. H., & Garbin, C. P. (1984). What makes the Mueller a liar: A multiple-cue approach. Perception & Psychophysics, 36(3), 234-244. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206364

What makes the Mueller a liar : A multiple-cue approach. / McClellan, Pamela G.; Bernstein, Ira H.; Garbin, Calvin P.

In: Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 36, No. 3, 01.05.1984, p. 234-244.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McClellan, PG, Bernstein, IH & Garbin, CP 1984, 'What makes the Mueller a liar: A multiple-cue approach', Perception & Psychophysics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 234-244. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206364
McClellan, Pamela G. ; Bernstein, Ira H. ; Garbin, Calvin P. / What makes the Mueller a liar : A multiple-cue approach. In: Perception & Psychophysics. 1984 ; Vol. 36, No. 3. pp. 234-244.
@article{f6b9e7333ef5412597c20b6680bb840e,
title = "What makes the Mueller a liar: A multiple-cue approach",
abstract = "Subjects made magnitude estimations of fins-in and fins-out Mueller Lyer stimuli. Shaft length, fin length, and fin angle were within-subjects variables, and the sitmuli could be either conventional solid drawings or dot forms, a between-subjects variable. The parametric effects of these variables were similar to results previously obtained. However, principal emphasis was given to lens model and related multivariate analyses of the subjects' judgments. These analyses suggested that no single {"}critical{"} cue seemed to account for the illusion. Rather, various sets of cues could be formulated to simulate the subjects' judgmental behavior equivalently. In addition, field-independent subjects showed better knowledge of the cue structure than field-dependent subjects. In the main, subjects in this experiment performed like subjects have in tasks not involving visual illusions with multiple sources of information varying in their relevance.",
author = "McClellan, {Pamela G.} and Bernstein, {Ira H.} and Garbin, {Calvin P}",
year = "1984",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03206364",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "234--244",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What makes the Mueller a liar

T2 - A multiple-cue approach

AU - McClellan, Pamela G.

AU - Bernstein, Ira H.

AU - Garbin, Calvin P

PY - 1984/5/1

Y1 - 1984/5/1

N2 - Subjects made magnitude estimations of fins-in and fins-out Mueller Lyer stimuli. Shaft length, fin length, and fin angle were within-subjects variables, and the sitmuli could be either conventional solid drawings or dot forms, a between-subjects variable. The parametric effects of these variables were similar to results previously obtained. However, principal emphasis was given to lens model and related multivariate analyses of the subjects' judgments. These analyses suggested that no single "critical" cue seemed to account for the illusion. Rather, various sets of cues could be formulated to simulate the subjects' judgmental behavior equivalently. In addition, field-independent subjects showed better knowledge of the cue structure than field-dependent subjects. In the main, subjects in this experiment performed like subjects have in tasks not involving visual illusions with multiple sources of information varying in their relevance.

AB - Subjects made magnitude estimations of fins-in and fins-out Mueller Lyer stimuli. Shaft length, fin length, and fin angle were within-subjects variables, and the sitmuli could be either conventional solid drawings or dot forms, a between-subjects variable. The parametric effects of these variables were similar to results previously obtained. However, principal emphasis was given to lens model and related multivariate analyses of the subjects' judgments. These analyses suggested that no single "critical" cue seemed to account for the illusion. Rather, various sets of cues could be formulated to simulate the subjects' judgmental behavior equivalently. In addition, field-independent subjects showed better knowledge of the cue structure than field-dependent subjects. In the main, subjects in this experiment performed like subjects have in tasks not involving visual illusions with multiple sources of information varying in their relevance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021496546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021496546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03206364

DO - 10.3758/BF03206364

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 234

EP - 244

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 3

ER -