What Do We Mean When We Say “Collaboration”?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the first of what certainly will be many thoughtful and provocative articles to appear in this column, Witt (1990) questioned the validity of the broadly accepted mandate that “our consultative interactions be collaborative” (p. 367). He continued with anecdotes illustrating ineffective teaching practices and deficient teacher skills which mitigated against the desirability of a “true” collaborative approach. The title of the article articulates Witts stated purpose: “Collaboration in School-Based Consultation: Myth in Need of Data.” My purpose in this article is not to argue for or against Witts position. Rather, I suggest that we go beyond this argument and consider a more meaningful framework to describe the manner in which these processes interact dynamically and reciprocally to promote our shared goals of educating and socializing youth. Likewise, I discuss potential implications of failing to acknowledge key aspects of collaboration within the practice of consultation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-92
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Educational and Psychological Consultation
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

Referral and Consultation
Anecdotes
Teaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

What Do We Mean When We Say “Collaboration”? / Sheridan, Susan M.

In: Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, Vol. 3, No. 1, 01.01.1992, p. 89-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5384b06296234b5a841b9b4ca3335b5e,
title = "What Do We Mean When We Say “Collaboration”?",
abstract = "In the first of what certainly will be many thoughtful and provocative articles to appear in this column, Witt (1990) questioned the validity of the broadly accepted mandate that “our consultative interactions be collaborative” (p. 367). He continued with anecdotes illustrating ineffective teaching practices and deficient teacher skills which mitigated against the desirability of a “true” collaborative approach. The title of the article articulates Witts stated purpose: “Collaboration in School-Based Consultation: Myth in Need of Data.” My purpose in this article is not to argue for or against Witts position. Rather, I suggest that we go beyond this argument and consider a more meaningful framework to describe the manner in which these processes interact dynamically and reciprocally to promote our shared goals of educating and socializing youth. Likewise, I discuss potential implications of failing to acknowledge key aspects of collaboration within the practice of consultation.",
author = "Sheridan, {Susan M}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1207/s1532768xjepc0301_7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "89--92",
journal = "Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation",
issn = "1047-4412",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Do We Mean When We Say “Collaboration”?

AU - Sheridan, Susan M

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - In the first of what certainly will be many thoughtful and provocative articles to appear in this column, Witt (1990) questioned the validity of the broadly accepted mandate that “our consultative interactions be collaborative” (p. 367). He continued with anecdotes illustrating ineffective teaching practices and deficient teacher skills which mitigated against the desirability of a “true” collaborative approach. The title of the article articulates Witts stated purpose: “Collaboration in School-Based Consultation: Myth in Need of Data.” My purpose in this article is not to argue for or against Witts position. Rather, I suggest that we go beyond this argument and consider a more meaningful framework to describe the manner in which these processes interact dynamically and reciprocally to promote our shared goals of educating and socializing youth. Likewise, I discuss potential implications of failing to acknowledge key aspects of collaboration within the practice of consultation.

AB - In the first of what certainly will be many thoughtful and provocative articles to appear in this column, Witt (1990) questioned the validity of the broadly accepted mandate that “our consultative interactions be collaborative” (p. 367). He continued with anecdotes illustrating ineffective teaching practices and deficient teacher skills which mitigated against the desirability of a “true” collaborative approach. The title of the article articulates Witts stated purpose: “Collaboration in School-Based Consultation: Myth in Need of Data.” My purpose in this article is not to argue for or against Witts position. Rather, I suggest that we go beyond this argument and consider a more meaningful framework to describe the manner in which these processes interact dynamically and reciprocally to promote our shared goals of educating and socializing youth. Likewise, I discuss potential implications of failing to acknowledge key aspects of collaboration within the practice of consultation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002667250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002667250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s1532768xjepc0301_7

DO - 10.1207/s1532768xjepc0301_7

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 89

EP - 92

JO - Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation

JF - Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation

SN - 1047-4412

IS - 1

ER -