What can researchers tell the courts, and what can the courts tell researchers about sexual harassment?

Brian H Bornstein, Meera Adya

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The chapters by Gutek and by Wiener and Winter (this volume) highlight what is possibly the most vexing component of sexual harassment jurisprudence, namely, how does the law of sexual harassment influence psychological research on the topic, and vice versa? As Gutek points out, it is difficult to determine exactly what the law is, because it is continually evolving. Both authors make the excellent point that the broader concept of "social-sexual behaviors" in the workplace-in contrast to the narrower legal concept of sexual harassment-affords a wealth of interesting psychological research topics, in areas such as person perception, attitudes, stereotypes, etc. Indeed, as we discuss in the text that follows, the concept of a continuum of "social-sexual behaviors" seems to be a promising guide for future research. However, to ensure that psychological research is still relevant in its applications such that it can influence the courts, public policy, and companies' policies, it is essential that it address relevant real-world and legal scenarios (Wiener & Hurt, 2000; Wiener et al., 2002;). In this chapter, we use the preceding chapters as a springboard to address several issues that have implications for how researchers should conduct studies of sexual harassment, and for the legal and policy implications of that research. First, we consider the diverse meanings of sexual harassment-that is, how the law and the public construe the term-and discuss some of the intended and unintended effects of sexual harassment policies. Second, we look at how the "totality of the circumstances" test applies to sexual harassment. Third, we consider some of the difficulties inherent in measuring sexual harassment and similar behaviors. We conclude with recommendations for what researchers and the courts can both do in addressing this vexing issue together.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSocial Consciousness in Legal Decision Making
Subtitle of host publicationPsychological Perspectives
PublisherSpringer US
Pages197-206
Number of pages10
ISBN (Print)9780387462172
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007

Fingerprint

Sexual Harassment
Research Personnel
Psychology
Research
Sexual Behavior
Jurisprudence
Public Policy
Workplace

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Bornstein, B. H., & Adya, M. (2007). What can researchers tell the courts, and what can the courts tell researchers about sexual harassment? In Social Consciousness in Legal Decision Making: Psychological Perspectives (pp. 197-206). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46218-9_10

What can researchers tell the courts, and what can the courts tell researchers about sexual harassment? / Bornstein, Brian H; Adya, Meera.

Social Consciousness in Legal Decision Making: Psychological Perspectives. Springer US, 2007. p. 197-206.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Bornstein, BH & Adya, M 2007, What can researchers tell the courts, and what can the courts tell researchers about sexual harassment? in Social Consciousness in Legal Decision Making: Psychological Perspectives. Springer US, pp. 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46218-9_10
Bornstein BH, Adya M. What can researchers tell the courts, and what can the courts tell researchers about sexual harassment? In Social Consciousness in Legal Decision Making: Psychological Perspectives. Springer US. 2007. p. 197-206 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46218-9_10
Bornstein, Brian H ; Adya, Meera. / What can researchers tell the courts, and what can the courts tell researchers about sexual harassment?. Social Consciousness in Legal Decision Making: Psychological Perspectives. Springer US, 2007. pp. 197-206
@inbook{b924fb5acaae4b95b0e66705cd88c018,
title = "What can researchers tell the courts, and what can the courts tell researchers about sexual harassment?",
abstract = "The chapters by Gutek and by Wiener and Winter (this volume) highlight what is possibly the most vexing component of sexual harassment jurisprudence, namely, how does the law of sexual harassment influence psychological research on the topic, and vice versa? As Gutek points out, it is difficult to determine exactly what the law is, because it is continually evolving. Both authors make the excellent point that the broader concept of {"}social-sexual behaviors{"} in the workplace-in contrast to the narrower legal concept of sexual harassment-affords a wealth of interesting psychological research topics, in areas such as person perception, attitudes, stereotypes, etc. Indeed, as we discuss in the text that follows, the concept of a continuum of {"}social-sexual behaviors{"} seems to be a promising guide for future research. However, to ensure that psychological research is still relevant in its applications such that it can influence the courts, public policy, and companies' policies, it is essential that it address relevant real-world and legal scenarios (Wiener & Hurt, 2000; Wiener et al., 2002;). In this chapter, we use the preceding chapters as a springboard to address several issues that have implications for how researchers should conduct studies of sexual harassment, and for the legal and policy implications of that research. First, we consider the diverse meanings of sexual harassment-that is, how the law and the public construe the term-and discuss some of the intended and unintended effects of sexual harassment policies. Second, we look at how the {"}totality of the circumstances{"} test applies to sexual harassment. Third, we consider some of the difficulties inherent in measuring sexual harassment and similar behaviors. We conclude with recommendations for what researchers and the courts can both do in addressing this vexing issue together.",
author = "Bornstein, {Brian H} and Meera Adya",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-0-387-46218-9_10",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780387462172",
pages = "197--206",
booktitle = "Social Consciousness in Legal Decision Making",
publisher = "Springer US",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - What can researchers tell the courts, and what can the courts tell researchers about sexual harassment?

AU - Bornstein, Brian H

AU - Adya, Meera

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - The chapters by Gutek and by Wiener and Winter (this volume) highlight what is possibly the most vexing component of sexual harassment jurisprudence, namely, how does the law of sexual harassment influence psychological research on the topic, and vice versa? As Gutek points out, it is difficult to determine exactly what the law is, because it is continually evolving. Both authors make the excellent point that the broader concept of "social-sexual behaviors" in the workplace-in contrast to the narrower legal concept of sexual harassment-affords a wealth of interesting psychological research topics, in areas such as person perception, attitudes, stereotypes, etc. Indeed, as we discuss in the text that follows, the concept of a continuum of "social-sexual behaviors" seems to be a promising guide for future research. However, to ensure that psychological research is still relevant in its applications such that it can influence the courts, public policy, and companies' policies, it is essential that it address relevant real-world and legal scenarios (Wiener & Hurt, 2000; Wiener et al., 2002;). In this chapter, we use the preceding chapters as a springboard to address several issues that have implications for how researchers should conduct studies of sexual harassment, and for the legal and policy implications of that research. First, we consider the diverse meanings of sexual harassment-that is, how the law and the public construe the term-and discuss some of the intended and unintended effects of sexual harassment policies. Second, we look at how the "totality of the circumstances" test applies to sexual harassment. Third, we consider some of the difficulties inherent in measuring sexual harassment and similar behaviors. We conclude with recommendations for what researchers and the courts can both do in addressing this vexing issue together.

AB - The chapters by Gutek and by Wiener and Winter (this volume) highlight what is possibly the most vexing component of sexual harassment jurisprudence, namely, how does the law of sexual harassment influence psychological research on the topic, and vice versa? As Gutek points out, it is difficult to determine exactly what the law is, because it is continually evolving. Both authors make the excellent point that the broader concept of "social-sexual behaviors" in the workplace-in contrast to the narrower legal concept of sexual harassment-affords a wealth of interesting psychological research topics, in areas such as person perception, attitudes, stereotypes, etc. Indeed, as we discuss in the text that follows, the concept of a continuum of "social-sexual behaviors" seems to be a promising guide for future research. However, to ensure that psychological research is still relevant in its applications such that it can influence the courts, public policy, and companies' policies, it is essential that it address relevant real-world and legal scenarios (Wiener & Hurt, 2000; Wiener et al., 2002;). In this chapter, we use the preceding chapters as a springboard to address several issues that have implications for how researchers should conduct studies of sexual harassment, and for the legal and policy implications of that research. First, we consider the diverse meanings of sexual harassment-that is, how the law and the public construe the term-and discuss some of the intended and unintended effects of sexual harassment policies. Second, we look at how the "totality of the circumstances" test applies to sexual harassment. Third, we consider some of the difficulties inherent in measuring sexual harassment and similar behaviors. We conclude with recommendations for what researchers and the courts can both do in addressing this vexing issue together.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889968796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889968796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-0-387-46218-9_10

DO - 10.1007/978-0-387-46218-9_10

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780387462172

SP - 197

EP - 206

BT - Social Consciousness in Legal Decision Making

PB - Springer US

ER -