What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity

Stacie R. Keller, Richard L. Wiener

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Jury researchers have long been concerned about the generalizability of results from experiments that utilize undergraduate students as mock jurors. The current experiment examined the differences between 120 students (55 males and 65 females, mean age=20 years) and 99 community members (49 males and 50 females, mean age=42 years) in culpability evaluations for homicide and sexual assault cases. Explicit attitude measures served as indicators of bias for sexual assault, defendant, and homicide adjudication. Results revealed that student and community participants showed different biases on these general explicit attitude measures and these differences manifested in judgments of culpability (guilt likelihood, convincingness of state's arguments, convincingness of defendant's arguments, and the defendants' criminal intentions) in sexual assault and homicide case scenarios. The results also showed that student mock jurors were more lenient when assigning guilt in homicide cases than were community members. The implications for future mock jury research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)376-394
Number of pages19
JournalBehavioral Sciences and the Law
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2011

Fingerprint

Homicide
construct validity
homicide
assault
Students
Guilt
guilt
community
student
experiment
trend
Research Personnel
scenario
evaluation
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Cite this

What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity. / Keller, Stacie R.; Wiener, Richard L.

In: Behavioral Sciences and the Law, Vol. 29, No. 3, 01.05.2011, p. 376-394.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{094fb924f7c444aabb0b4f3dee05d34a,
title = "What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity",
abstract = "Jury researchers have long been concerned about the generalizability of results from experiments that utilize undergraduate students as mock jurors. The current experiment examined the differences between 120 students (55 males and 65 females, mean age=20 years) and 99 community members (49 males and 50 females, mean age=42 years) in culpability evaluations for homicide and sexual assault cases. Explicit attitude measures served as indicators of bias for sexual assault, defendant, and homicide adjudication. Results revealed that student and community participants showed different biases on these general explicit attitude measures and these differences manifested in judgments of culpability (guilt likelihood, convincingness of state's arguments, convincingness of defendant's arguments, and the defendants' criminal intentions) in sexual assault and homicide case scenarios. The results also showed that student mock jurors were more lenient when assigning guilt in homicide cases than were community members. The implications for future mock jury research are discussed.",
author = "Keller, {Stacie R.} and Wiener, {Richard L.}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/bsl.971",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "376--394",
journal = "Behavioral Sciences and the Law",
issn = "0735-3936",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity

AU - Keller, Stacie R.

AU - Wiener, Richard L.

PY - 2011/5/1

Y1 - 2011/5/1

N2 - Jury researchers have long been concerned about the generalizability of results from experiments that utilize undergraduate students as mock jurors. The current experiment examined the differences between 120 students (55 males and 65 females, mean age=20 years) and 99 community members (49 males and 50 females, mean age=42 years) in culpability evaluations for homicide and sexual assault cases. Explicit attitude measures served as indicators of bias for sexual assault, defendant, and homicide adjudication. Results revealed that student and community participants showed different biases on these general explicit attitude measures and these differences manifested in judgments of culpability (guilt likelihood, convincingness of state's arguments, convincingness of defendant's arguments, and the defendants' criminal intentions) in sexual assault and homicide case scenarios. The results also showed that student mock jurors were more lenient when assigning guilt in homicide cases than were community members. The implications for future mock jury research are discussed.

AB - Jury researchers have long been concerned about the generalizability of results from experiments that utilize undergraduate students as mock jurors. The current experiment examined the differences between 120 students (55 males and 65 females, mean age=20 years) and 99 community members (49 males and 50 females, mean age=42 years) in culpability evaluations for homicide and sexual assault cases. Explicit attitude measures served as indicators of bias for sexual assault, defendant, and homicide adjudication. Results revealed that student and community participants showed different biases on these general explicit attitude measures and these differences manifested in judgments of culpability (guilt likelihood, convincingness of state's arguments, convincingness of defendant's arguments, and the defendants' criminal intentions) in sexual assault and homicide case scenarios. The results also showed that student mock jurors were more lenient when assigning guilt in homicide cases than were community members. The implications for future mock jury research are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960454677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960454677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bsl.971

DO - 10.1002/bsl.971

M3 - Article

C2 - 21766327

AN - SCOPUS:79960454677

VL - 29

SP - 376

EP - 394

JO - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

JF - Behavioral Sciences and the Law

SN - 0735-3936

IS - 3

ER -