Wellness-Promoting Practices Through Girl Scouts: A Pragmatic Superiority Randomized Controlled Trial With Additional Dissemination

Brooke J. Cull, David A Dzewaltowski, Justin M. Guagliano, Sara K. Rosenkranz, Cassandra K. Knutson, Richard R. Rosenkranz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of in-person versus online Girl Scout leader wellness training for implementation of wellness-promoting practices during troop meetings (phase I) and to assess training adoption and current practices across the council (phase II). Design: Pragmatic superiority trial (phase 1) followed by serial cross-sectional study (phase II). Setting: Girl Scout troop meetings in Northeast Kansas. Participants: Eighteen troop leaders from 3 counties (phase 1); 113 troop leaders from 7 counties (phase II). Intervention: Phase I: Troop leaders attended 2 wellness training sessions (first in groups, second individually), wherein leaders set wellness-promoting practice implementation goals, self-monitored progress, and received guidance and resources for implementation. Leaders received the intervention in person or online. Measures: Phase I: At baseline and postintervention, leaders completed a wellness-promoting practice implementation questionnaire assessing practices during troop meetings (max score = 11). Phase II: Leaders completed a survey about typical troop practices and interest in further training. Analysis: Phase I: Generalized linear mixed modeling. Results: Phase I: In-person training increased wellness-promoting practice implementation more than online training (in person = 2.1 ± 1.8; online = 0.2 ± 1.2; P =.022). Phase II: Fifty-six percent of leaders adopted the training. For 8 of 11 wellness categories, greater than 50% of leaders employed wellness-promoting practices. Conclusion: In-person training was superior to online training for improvements in wellness-promoting practices. Wellness training was adopted by the majority of leaders across the council.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1544-1554
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Health Promotion
Volume32
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

scout
pragmatics
Randomized Controlled Trials
leader
Pragmatic Clinical Trials
human being
Cross-Sectional Studies
cross-sectional study

Keywords

  • child obesity
  • health promotion
  • nutrition
  • physical activity
  • wellness policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Wellness-Promoting Practices Through Girl Scouts : A Pragmatic Superiority Randomized Controlled Trial With Additional Dissemination. / Cull, Brooke J.; Dzewaltowski, David A; Guagliano, Justin M.; Rosenkranz, Sara K.; Knutson, Cassandra K.; Rosenkranz, Richard R.

In: American Journal of Health Promotion, Vol. 32, No. 7, 01.09.2018, p. 1544-1554.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cull, Brooke J. ; Dzewaltowski, David A ; Guagliano, Justin M. ; Rosenkranz, Sara K. ; Knutson, Cassandra K. ; Rosenkranz, Richard R. / Wellness-Promoting Practices Through Girl Scouts : A Pragmatic Superiority Randomized Controlled Trial With Additional Dissemination. In: American Journal of Health Promotion. 2018 ; Vol. 32, No. 7. pp. 1544-1554.
@article{d7926b76a9914f39ad4eac41059d3880,
title = "Wellness-Promoting Practices Through Girl Scouts: A Pragmatic Superiority Randomized Controlled Trial With Additional Dissemination",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of in-person versus online Girl Scout leader wellness training for implementation of wellness-promoting practices during troop meetings (phase I) and to assess training adoption and current practices across the council (phase II). Design: Pragmatic superiority trial (phase 1) followed by serial cross-sectional study (phase II). Setting: Girl Scout troop meetings in Northeast Kansas. Participants: Eighteen troop leaders from 3 counties (phase 1); 113 troop leaders from 7 counties (phase II). Intervention: Phase I: Troop leaders attended 2 wellness training sessions (first in groups, second individually), wherein leaders set wellness-promoting practice implementation goals, self-monitored progress, and received guidance and resources for implementation. Leaders received the intervention in person or online. Measures: Phase I: At baseline and postintervention, leaders completed a wellness-promoting practice implementation questionnaire assessing practices during troop meetings (max score = 11). Phase II: Leaders completed a survey about typical troop practices and interest in further training. Analysis: Phase I: Generalized linear mixed modeling. Results: Phase I: In-person training increased wellness-promoting practice implementation more than online training (in person = 2.1 ± 1.8; online = 0.2 ± 1.2; P =.022). Phase II: Fifty-six percent of leaders adopted the training. For 8 of 11 wellness categories, greater than 50{\%} of leaders employed wellness-promoting practices. Conclusion: In-person training was superior to online training for improvements in wellness-promoting practices. Wellness training was adopted by the majority of leaders across the council.",
keywords = "child obesity, health promotion, nutrition, physical activity, wellness policy",
author = "Cull, {Brooke J.} and Dzewaltowski, {David A} and Guagliano, {Justin M.} and Rosenkranz, {Sara K.} and Knutson, {Cassandra K.} and Rosenkranz, {Richard R.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0890117118754825",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "1544--1554",
journal = "American Journal of Health Promotion",
issn = "0890-1171",
publisher = "American Journal of Health Promotion",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wellness-Promoting Practices Through Girl Scouts

T2 - A Pragmatic Superiority Randomized Controlled Trial With Additional Dissemination

AU - Cull, Brooke J.

AU - Dzewaltowski, David A

AU - Guagliano, Justin M.

AU - Rosenkranz, Sara K.

AU - Knutson, Cassandra K.

AU - Rosenkranz, Richard R.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of in-person versus online Girl Scout leader wellness training for implementation of wellness-promoting practices during troop meetings (phase I) and to assess training adoption and current practices across the council (phase II). Design: Pragmatic superiority trial (phase 1) followed by serial cross-sectional study (phase II). Setting: Girl Scout troop meetings in Northeast Kansas. Participants: Eighteen troop leaders from 3 counties (phase 1); 113 troop leaders from 7 counties (phase II). Intervention: Phase I: Troop leaders attended 2 wellness training sessions (first in groups, second individually), wherein leaders set wellness-promoting practice implementation goals, self-monitored progress, and received guidance and resources for implementation. Leaders received the intervention in person or online. Measures: Phase I: At baseline and postintervention, leaders completed a wellness-promoting practice implementation questionnaire assessing practices during troop meetings (max score = 11). Phase II: Leaders completed a survey about typical troop practices and interest in further training. Analysis: Phase I: Generalized linear mixed modeling. Results: Phase I: In-person training increased wellness-promoting practice implementation more than online training (in person = 2.1 ± 1.8; online = 0.2 ± 1.2; P =.022). Phase II: Fifty-six percent of leaders adopted the training. For 8 of 11 wellness categories, greater than 50% of leaders employed wellness-promoting practices. Conclusion: In-person training was superior to online training for improvements in wellness-promoting practices. Wellness training was adopted by the majority of leaders across the council.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of in-person versus online Girl Scout leader wellness training for implementation of wellness-promoting practices during troop meetings (phase I) and to assess training adoption and current practices across the council (phase II). Design: Pragmatic superiority trial (phase 1) followed by serial cross-sectional study (phase II). Setting: Girl Scout troop meetings in Northeast Kansas. Participants: Eighteen troop leaders from 3 counties (phase 1); 113 troop leaders from 7 counties (phase II). Intervention: Phase I: Troop leaders attended 2 wellness training sessions (first in groups, second individually), wherein leaders set wellness-promoting practice implementation goals, self-monitored progress, and received guidance and resources for implementation. Leaders received the intervention in person or online. Measures: Phase I: At baseline and postintervention, leaders completed a wellness-promoting practice implementation questionnaire assessing practices during troop meetings (max score = 11). Phase II: Leaders completed a survey about typical troop practices and interest in further training. Analysis: Phase I: Generalized linear mixed modeling. Results: Phase I: In-person training increased wellness-promoting practice implementation more than online training (in person = 2.1 ± 1.8; online = 0.2 ± 1.2; P =.022). Phase II: Fifty-six percent of leaders adopted the training. For 8 of 11 wellness categories, greater than 50% of leaders employed wellness-promoting practices. Conclusion: In-person training was superior to online training for improvements in wellness-promoting practices. Wellness training was adopted by the majority of leaders across the council.

KW - child obesity

KW - health promotion

KW - nutrition

KW - physical activity

KW - wellness policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041609281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041609281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0890117118754825

DO - 10.1177/0890117118754825

M3 - Article

C2 - 29378416

AN - SCOPUS:85041609281

VL - 32

SP - 1544

EP - 1554

JO - American Journal of Health Promotion

JF - American Journal of Health Promotion

SN - 0890-1171

IS - 7

ER -