Walk score® versus residents’ perceptions of walkability in omaha, ne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With an easily accessible online interface, Walk Score® has emerged as one of the most popular metrics to assess walkability, both within and outside academia. Based primarily on accessibility to common daily amenities, this quantitative measure is limited to a macro-scale view of urban form that does not consider micro-scale design elements that can significantly impact walking behavior such as building setbacks, sidewalk characteristics, lighting, or traffic volume. This study employed a survey and cognitive mapping exercise to identify neighborhood typologies in which Walk Score and residents’ perceptions of walkability are most likely to align, and, more crucially, where they are most likely to be at odds. Relative to residents’ perceptions, Walk Score tended to overestimate the walkability of suburban strip-mall corridors and underestimate the walkability of recreational areas and small entertainment districts. Potential differences in residents’ perceptions of walkability, and their associations with Walk Score, were also explored.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)412-435
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Urbanism
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

resident
amenity
walking
typology
accessibility
traffic volume
entertainment
work environment
district
lighting
corridor
recreational area
traffic

Keywords

  • Built environment
  • Cognitive map
  • Mental map
  • Perceptions
  • Walk Score
  • Walkability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Walk score® versus residents’ perceptions of walkability in omaha, ne. / Bereitschaft, Bradley JF.

In: Journal of Urbanism, Vol. 11, No. 4, 01.01.2018, p. 412-435.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{81318f1f1eba47c59f3f265c7784a646,
title = "Walk score{\circledR} versus residents’ perceptions of walkability in omaha, ne",
abstract = "With an easily accessible online interface, Walk Score{\circledR} has emerged as one of the most popular metrics to assess walkability, both within and outside academia. Based primarily on accessibility to common daily amenities, this quantitative measure is limited to a macro-scale view of urban form that does not consider micro-scale design elements that can significantly impact walking behavior such as building setbacks, sidewalk characteristics, lighting, or traffic volume. This study employed a survey and cognitive mapping exercise to identify neighborhood typologies in which Walk Score and residents’ perceptions of walkability are most likely to align, and, more crucially, where they are most likely to be at odds. Relative to residents’ perceptions, Walk Score tended to overestimate the walkability of suburban strip-mall corridors and underestimate the walkability of recreational areas and small entertainment districts. Potential differences in residents’ perceptions of walkability, and their associations with Walk Score, were also explored.",
keywords = "Built environment, Cognitive map, Mental map, Perceptions, Walk Score, Walkability",
author = "Bereitschaft, {Bradley JF}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/17549175.2018.1484795",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "412--435",
journal = "Journal of Urbanism",
issn = "1754-9175",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Walk score® versus residents’ perceptions of walkability in omaha, ne

AU - Bereitschaft, Bradley JF

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - With an easily accessible online interface, Walk Score® has emerged as one of the most popular metrics to assess walkability, both within and outside academia. Based primarily on accessibility to common daily amenities, this quantitative measure is limited to a macro-scale view of urban form that does not consider micro-scale design elements that can significantly impact walking behavior such as building setbacks, sidewalk characteristics, lighting, or traffic volume. This study employed a survey and cognitive mapping exercise to identify neighborhood typologies in which Walk Score and residents’ perceptions of walkability are most likely to align, and, more crucially, where they are most likely to be at odds. Relative to residents’ perceptions, Walk Score tended to overestimate the walkability of suburban strip-mall corridors and underestimate the walkability of recreational areas and small entertainment districts. Potential differences in residents’ perceptions of walkability, and their associations with Walk Score, were also explored.

AB - With an easily accessible online interface, Walk Score® has emerged as one of the most popular metrics to assess walkability, both within and outside academia. Based primarily on accessibility to common daily amenities, this quantitative measure is limited to a macro-scale view of urban form that does not consider micro-scale design elements that can significantly impact walking behavior such as building setbacks, sidewalk characteristics, lighting, or traffic volume. This study employed a survey and cognitive mapping exercise to identify neighborhood typologies in which Walk Score and residents’ perceptions of walkability are most likely to align, and, more crucially, where they are most likely to be at odds. Relative to residents’ perceptions, Walk Score tended to overestimate the walkability of suburban strip-mall corridors and underestimate the walkability of recreational areas and small entertainment districts. Potential differences in residents’ perceptions of walkability, and their associations with Walk Score, were also explored.

KW - Built environment

KW - Cognitive map

KW - Mental map

KW - Perceptions

KW - Walk Score

KW - Walkability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062978811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062978811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17549175.2018.1484795

DO - 10.1080/17549175.2018.1484795

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 412

EP - 435

JO - Journal of Urbanism

JF - Journal of Urbanism

SN - 1754-9175

IS - 4

ER -