Voter participation, socioeconomic status, and institutional contexts in higher education

Jodi Benenson, Inger Bergom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Using data from the National Study of Learning, Voting, and Engagement, this study examined the relationship between student and institutional characteristics and college student voting in the 2012 U.S. general election, and how this relationship varied by socioeconomic status (SES). After controlling for several student-and institution-level characteristics, we found that student major and in-or out-of-state enrollment status as well as institutional structural diversity and institutional Carnegie Classification predict voting, but not necessarily for both low-and high-SES students. These findings have implications for civic education and higher education’s fulfillment of its civic mission.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1665-1688
Number of pages24
JournalReview of Higher Education
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

social status
voter
participation
voting
education
student
election
learning

Keywords

  • Civic engagement
  • College students
  • Socioeconomic status
  • Voter participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Voter participation, socioeconomic status, and institutional contexts in higher education. / Benenson, Jodi; Bergom, Inger.

In: Review of Higher Education, Vol. 42, No. 4, 01.06.2019, p. 1665-1688.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1a7a6b00641a46bf80d3fc39f12a9105,
title = "Voter participation, socioeconomic status, and institutional contexts in higher education",
abstract = "Using data from the National Study of Learning, Voting, and Engagement, this study examined the relationship between student and institutional characteristics and college student voting in the 2012 U.S. general election, and how this relationship varied by socioeconomic status (SES). After controlling for several student-and institution-level characteristics, we found that student major and in-or out-of-state enrollment status as well as institutional structural diversity and institutional Carnegie Classification predict voting, but not necessarily for both low-and high-SES students. These findings have implications for civic education and higher education’s fulfillment of its civic mission.",
keywords = "Civic engagement, College students, Socioeconomic status, Voter participation",
author = "Jodi Benenson and Inger Bergom",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/rhe.2019.0079",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "1665--1688",
journal = "Review of Higher Education",
issn = "0162-5748",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Voter participation, socioeconomic status, and institutional contexts in higher education

AU - Benenson, Jodi

AU - Bergom, Inger

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Using data from the National Study of Learning, Voting, and Engagement, this study examined the relationship between student and institutional characteristics and college student voting in the 2012 U.S. general election, and how this relationship varied by socioeconomic status (SES). After controlling for several student-and institution-level characteristics, we found that student major and in-or out-of-state enrollment status as well as institutional structural diversity and institutional Carnegie Classification predict voting, but not necessarily for both low-and high-SES students. These findings have implications for civic education and higher education’s fulfillment of its civic mission.

AB - Using data from the National Study of Learning, Voting, and Engagement, this study examined the relationship between student and institutional characteristics and college student voting in the 2012 U.S. general election, and how this relationship varied by socioeconomic status (SES). After controlling for several student-and institution-level characteristics, we found that student major and in-or out-of-state enrollment status as well as institutional structural diversity and institutional Carnegie Classification predict voting, but not necessarily for both low-and high-SES students. These findings have implications for civic education and higher education’s fulfillment of its civic mission.

KW - Civic engagement

KW - College students

KW - Socioeconomic status

KW - Voter participation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070949460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070949460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/rhe.2019.0079

DO - 10.1353/rhe.2019.0079

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070949460

VL - 42

SP - 1665

EP - 1688

JO - Review of Higher Education

JF - Review of Higher Education

SN - 0162-5748

IS - 4

ER -