Voices for food: Methodologies for implementing a multi-state community-based intervention in rural, high poverty communities

Suzanne Stluka, Lindsay Moore, Heather A. Eicher-Miller, Lisa Franzen-Castle, Becky Henne, Donna Mehrle, Daniel Remley, Lacey McCormack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Rural communities experience unique barriers to food access when compared to urban areas and food security is a public health issue in rural, high poverty communities. A multi-leveled socio-ecological intervention to develop food policy councils (FPCs), and improve food security in rural communities was created. Methods to carry out such an intervention were developed and are described. Methods: A longitudinal, matched treatment and comparison study was conducted in 24 rural, high poverty counties in South Dakota, Indiana, Missouri, Michigan, Nebraska and Ohio. Counties were assigned to a treatment (n = 12) or comparison (n = 12) group. Intervention activities focus on three key components that impact food security: 1) community coaching by Extension Educators/field staff, 2) FPC development, and 3) development of a MyChoice food pantry. Community coaching was only provided to intervention counties. Evaluation components focus on three levels of the intervention: 1) Community (FPCs), 2) Food Pantry Organization, and 3) Pantry Client & Families. Participants in this study were community stakeholders, food pantry directors, staff/volunteers and food pantry clients. Pantry food access/availability including pantry food quality and quantity, household food security and pantry client dietary intake are dependent variables. Discussion: The results of this study will provide a framework for utilizing a multi-leveled socio-ecological intervention with the purpose of improving food security in rural, high poverty communities. Additionally, the results of this study will yield evidence-based best practices and tools for both FPC development and the transition to a guided-client choice model of distribution in food pantries. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03566095. Retrospectively registered on June, 21, 2018.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1055
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 23 2018

Fingerprint

Poverty
Food Supply
Nutrition Policy
Food
Policy Making
Rural Population
Food Quality
Evidence-Based Practice
Practice Guidelines
Volunteers
Public Health
Organizations
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Community coaching
  • Community development
  • Food access
  • Food security
  • Nutrition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Voices for food : Methodologies for implementing a multi-state community-based intervention in rural, high poverty communities. / Stluka, Suzanne; Moore, Lindsay; Eicher-Miller, Heather A.; Franzen-Castle, Lisa; Henne, Becky; Mehrle, Donna; Remley, Daniel; McCormack, Lacey.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1055, 23.08.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stluka, Suzanne ; Moore, Lindsay ; Eicher-Miller, Heather A. ; Franzen-Castle, Lisa ; Henne, Becky ; Mehrle, Donna ; Remley, Daniel ; McCormack, Lacey. / Voices for food : Methodologies for implementing a multi-state community-based intervention in rural, high poverty communities. In: BMC Public Health. 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 1.
@article{8ec84ce19dc64239bd1558057c4341e6,
title = "Voices for food: Methodologies for implementing a multi-state community-based intervention in rural, high poverty communities",
abstract = "Background: Rural communities experience unique barriers to food access when compared to urban areas and food security is a public health issue in rural, high poverty communities. A multi-leveled socio-ecological intervention to develop food policy councils (FPCs), and improve food security in rural communities was created. Methods to carry out such an intervention were developed and are described. Methods: A longitudinal, matched treatment and comparison study was conducted in 24 rural, high poverty counties in South Dakota, Indiana, Missouri, Michigan, Nebraska and Ohio. Counties were assigned to a treatment (n = 12) or comparison (n = 12) group. Intervention activities focus on three key components that impact food security: 1) community coaching by Extension Educators/field staff, 2) FPC development, and 3) development of a MyChoice food pantry. Community coaching was only provided to intervention counties. Evaluation components focus on three levels of the intervention: 1) Community (FPCs), 2) Food Pantry Organization, and 3) Pantry Client & Families. Participants in this study were community stakeholders, food pantry directors, staff/volunteers and food pantry clients. Pantry food access/availability including pantry food quality and quantity, household food security and pantry client dietary intake are dependent variables. Discussion: The results of this study will provide a framework for utilizing a multi-leveled socio-ecological intervention with the purpose of improving food security in rural, high poverty communities. Additionally, the results of this study will yield evidence-based best practices and tools for both FPC development and the transition to a guided-client choice model of distribution in food pantries. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03566095. Retrospectively registered on June, 21, 2018.",
keywords = "Community coaching, Community development, Food access, Food security, Nutrition",
author = "Suzanne Stluka and Lindsay Moore and Eicher-Miller, {Heather A.} and Lisa Franzen-Castle and Becky Henne and Donna Mehrle and Daniel Remley and Lacey McCormack",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1186/s12889-018-5957-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Voices for food

T2 - Methodologies for implementing a multi-state community-based intervention in rural, high poverty communities

AU - Stluka, Suzanne

AU - Moore, Lindsay

AU - Eicher-Miller, Heather A.

AU - Franzen-Castle, Lisa

AU - Henne, Becky

AU - Mehrle, Donna

AU - Remley, Daniel

AU - McCormack, Lacey

PY - 2018/8/23

Y1 - 2018/8/23

N2 - Background: Rural communities experience unique barriers to food access when compared to urban areas and food security is a public health issue in rural, high poverty communities. A multi-leveled socio-ecological intervention to develop food policy councils (FPCs), and improve food security in rural communities was created. Methods to carry out such an intervention were developed and are described. Methods: A longitudinal, matched treatment and comparison study was conducted in 24 rural, high poverty counties in South Dakota, Indiana, Missouri, Michigan, Nebraska and Ohio. Counties were assigned to a treatment (n = 12) or comparison (n = 12) group. Intervention activities focus on three key components that impact food security: 1) community coaching by Extension Educators/field staff, 2) FPC development, and 3) development of a MyChoice food pantry. Community coaching was only provided to intervention counties. Evaluation components focus on three levels of the intervention: 1) Community (FPCs), 2) Food Pantry Organization, and 3) Pantry Client & Families. Participants in this study were community stakeholders, food pantry directors, staff/volunteers and food pantry clients. Pantry food access/availability including pantry food quality and quantity, household food security and pantry client dietary intake are dependent variables. Discussion: The results of this study will provide a framework for utilizing a multi-leveled socio-ecological intervention with the purpose of improving food security in rural, high poverty communities. Additionally, the results of this study will yield evidence-based best practices and tools for both FPC development and the transition to a guided-client choice model of distribution in food pantries. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03566095. Retrospectively registered on June, 21, 2018.

AB - Background: Rural communities experience unique barriers to food access when compared to urban areas and food security is a public health issue in rural, high poverty communities. A multi-leveled socio-ecological intervention to develop food policy councils (FPCs), and improve food security in rural communities was created. Methods to carry out such an intervention were developed and are described. Methods: A longitudinal, matched treatment and comparison study was conducted in 24 rural, high poverty counties in South Dakota, Indiana, Missouri, Michigan, Nebraska and Ohio. Counties were assigned to a treatment (n = 12) or comparison (n = 12) group. Intervention activities focus on three key components that impact food security: 1) community coaching by Extension Educators/field staff, 2) FPC development, and 3) development of a MyChoice food pantry. Community coaching was only provided to intervention counties. Evaluation components focus on three levels of the intervention: 1) Community (FPCs), 2) Food Pantry Organization, and 3) Pantry Client & Families. Participants in this study were community stakeholders, food pantry directors, staff/volunteers and food pantry clients. Pantry food access/availability including pantry food quality and quantity, household food security and pantry client dietary intake are dependent variables. Discussion: The results of this study will provide a framework for utilizing a multi-leveled socio-ecological intervention with the purpose of improving food security in rural, high poverty communities. Additionally, the results of this study will yield evidence-based best practices and tools for both FPC development and the transition to a guided-client choice model of distribution in food pantries. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03566095. Retrospectively registered on June, 21, 2018.

KW - Community coaching

KW - Community development

KW - Food access

KW - Food security

KW - Nutrition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052108138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052108138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12889-018-5957-9

DO - 10.1186/s12889-018-5957-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 30139336

AN - SCOPUS:85052108138

VL - 18

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

IS - 1

M1 - 1055

ER -