Visual Performance Feedback: Effects on Targeted and Nontargeted Staff

Raymond V. Burke, Monica R. Howard, Jane L. Peterson, Roger W. Peterson, Keith D Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study used a multiple baseline with reversal design to assess whether visual performance feedback (VPF) influenced targeted and nontargeted staffs' use of behavior-specific praise (BSP) in a day-treatment program. This study expands on the typical VPF audience and assesses whether VPF can be effective with noncertified staff in a day-treatment program for young children with behavior disorders, an environment in which it is difficult to maintain high rates of BSP. In previous school-based studies, VPF has been collected by researchers and provided to targeted teaching staff. In the current study, rather than relying on researchers, the authors used staff instructors to collect VPF and assessed how that experience influenced the instructors' use of BSP. Results suggest that VPF provided, on average, a doubling in rates of BSP use by directly targeted staff and more than a 50% increase in rates of BSP in nontargeted instructors who collected BSP data. Furthermore, three of the four participants had substantially higher praise-to-correction ratios during the VPF intervention when compared with baseline and reversal conditions. Implications for improving treatment fidelity and reducing supervision time are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)687-704
Number of pages18
JournalBehavior Modification
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

Fingerprint

Sensory Feedback
Child Behavior Disorders
Research Personnel
Staff
Teaching
Therapeutics
Instructor

Keywords

  • behavior-specific praise
  • day-treatment program
  • visual performance feedback

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Visual Performance Feedback : Effects on Targeted and Nontargeted Staff. / Burke, Raymond V.; Howard, Monica R.; Peterson, Jane L.; Peterson, Roger W.; Allen, Keith D.

In: Behavior Modification, Vol. 36, No. 5, 01.09.2012, p. 687-704.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burke, Raymond V. ; Howard, Monica R. ; Peterson, Jane L. ; Peterson, Roger W. ; Allen, Keith D. / Visual Performance Feedback : Effects on Targeted and Nontargeted Staff. In: Behavior Modification. 2012 ; Vol. 36, No. 5. pp. 687-704.
@article{d4a6fa613f254b119939934e1ed627db,
title = "Visual Performance Feedback: Effects on Targeted and Nontargeted Staff",
abstract = "This study used a multiple baseline with reversal design to assess whether visual performance feedback (VPF) influenced targeted and nontargeted staffs' use of behavior-specific praise (BSP) in a day-treatment program. This study expands on the typical VPF audience and assesses whether VPF can be effective with noncertified staff in a day-treatment program for young children with behavior disorders, an environment in which it is difficult to maintain high rates of BSP. In previous school-based studies, VPF has been collected by researchers and provided to targeted teaching staff. In the current study, rather than relying on researchers, the authors used staff instructors to collect VPF and assessed how that experience influenced the instructors' use of BSP. Results suggest that VPF provided, on average, a doubling in rates of BSP use by directly targeted staff and more than a 50{\%} increase in rates of BSP in nontargeted instructors who collected BSP data. Furthermore, three of the four participants had substantially higher praise-to-correction ratios during the VPF intervention when compared with baseline and reversal conditions. Implications for improving treatment fidelity and reducing supervision time are discussed.",
keywords = "behavior-specific praise, day-treatment program, visual performance feedback",
author = "Burke, {Raymond V.} and Howard, {Monica R.} and Peterson, {Jane L.} and Peterson, {Roger W.} and Allen, {Keith D}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0145445511436007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "687--704",
journal = "Behavior Modification",
issn = "0145-4455",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual Performance Feedback

T2 - Effects on Targeted and Nontargeted Staff

AU - Burke, Raymond V.

AU - Howard, Monica R.

AU - Peterson, Jane L.

AU - Peterson, Roger W.

AU - Allen, Keith D

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - This study used a multiple baseline with reversal design to assess whether visual performance feedback (VPF) influenced targeted and nontargeted staffs' use of behavior-specific praise (BSP) in a day-treatment program. This study expands on the typical VPF audience and assesses whether VPF can be effective with noncertified staff in a day-treatment program for young children with behavior disorders, an environment in which it is difficult to maintain high rates of BSP. In previous school-based studies, VPF has been collected by researchers and provided to targeted teaching staff. In the current study, rather than relying on researchers, the authors used staff instructors to collect VPF and assessed how that experience influenced the instructors' use of BSP. Results suggest that VPF provided, on average, a doubling in rates of BSP use by directly targeted staff and more than a 50% increase in rates of BSP in nontargeted instructors who collected BSP data. Furthermore, three of the four participants had substantially higher praise-to-correction ratios during the VPF intervention when compared with baseline and reversal conditions. Implications for improving treatment fidelity and reducing supervision time are discussed.

AB - This study used a multiple baseline with reversal design to assess whether visual performance feedback (VPF) influenced targeted and nontargeted staffs' use of behavior-specific praise (BSP) in a day-treatment program. This study expands on the typical VPF audience and assesses whether VPF can be effective with noncertified staff in a day-treatment program for young children with behavior disorders, an environment in which it is difficult to maintain high rates of BSP. In previous school-based studies, VPF has been collected by researchers and provided to targeted teaching staff. In the current study, rather than relying on researchers, the authors used staff instructors to collect VPF and assessed how that experience influenced the instructors' use of BSP. Results suggest that VPF provided, on average, a doubling in rates of BSP use by directly targeted staff and more than a 50% increase in rates of BSP in nontargeted instructors who collected BSP data. Furthermore, three of the four participants had substantially higher praise-to-correction ratios during the VPF intervention when compared with baseline and reversal conditions. Implications for improving treatment fidelity and reducing supervision time are discussed.

KW - behavior-specific praise

KW - day-treatment program

KW - visual performance feedback

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866390423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866390423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0145445511436007

DO - 10.1177/0145445511436007

M3 - Article

C2 - 22457341

AN - SCOPUS:84866390423

VL - 36

SP - 687

EP - 704

JO - Behavior Modification

JF - Behavior Modification

SN - 0145-4455

IS - 5

ER -