Abstract
Watson and Humphreys (1997) proposed that visual marking is a goal-directed process that enhances visual search through the inhibition of old objects. In addition to the standard marking case with targets at new locations, included in Experiment 1 was a set of trials with targets always at old locations, as well as a set of trials with targets varying between new and old locations. The participants' performance when detecting the target at old locations was equivalent to their performance in the full-baseline condition when they knew the target would be at old locations, and was worse when the target appeared at old locations on 50% of the trials. Marking was observed when the target appeared at new locations. In Experiment 2, an offset paradigm was used to eliminate the influence of the salient abrupt-onset feature of the new objects. No significant benefits were found for targets at new locations in the absence of onsets at new locations. The results suggest that visual marking may be an attentional selection mechanism that significantly benefits visual search when (1) the observer has an appropriate search goal, (2) the goal necessitates inhibition of old objects, and (3) the new objects include a salient perceptual feature.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 667-677 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Perception and Psychophysics |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2003 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Sensory Systems
- Psychology(all)
Cite this
Visual marking : A convergence of goal- and stimulus-driven processes during visual search. / Atchley, Paul; Jones, Sybil E.; Hoffman, Lesa R.
In: Perception and Psychophysics, Vol. 65, No. 5, 01.01.2003, p. 667-677.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Visual marking
T2 - A convergence of goal- and stimulus-driven processes during visual search
AU - Atchley, Paul
AU - Jones, Sybil E.
AU - Hoffman, Lesa R
PY - 2003/1/1
Y1 - 2003/1/1
N2 - Watson and Humphreys (1997) proposed that visual marking is a goal-directed process that enhances visual search through the inhibition of old objects. In addition to the standard marking case with targets at new locations, included in Experiment 1 was a set of trials with targets always at old locations, as well as a set of trials with targets varying between new and old locations. The participants' performance when detecting the target at old locations was equivalent to their performance in the full-baseline condition when they knew the target would be at old locations, and was worse when the target appeared at old locations on 50% of the trials. Marking was observed when the target appeared at new locations. In Experiment 2, an offset paradigm was used to eliminate the influence of the salient abrupt-onset feature of the new objects. No significant benefits were found for targets at new locations in the absence of onsets at new locations. The results suggest that visual marking may be an attentional selection mechanism that significantly benefits visual search when (1) the observer has an appropriate search goal, (2) the goal necessitates inhibition of old objects, and (3) the new objects include a salient perceptual feature.
AB - Watson and Humphreys (1997) proposed that visual marking is a goal-directed process that enhances visual search through the inhibition of old objects. In addition to the standard marking case with targets at new locations, included in Experiment 1 was a set of trials with targets always at old locations, as well as a set of trials with targets varying between new and old locations. The participants' performance when detecting the target at old locations was equivalent to their performance in the full-baseline condition when they knew the target would be at old locations, and was worse when the target appeared at old locations on 50% of the trials. Marking was observed when the target appeared at new locations. In Experiment 2, an offset paradigm was used to eliminate the influence of the salient abrupt-onset feature of the new objects. No significant benefits were found for targets at new locations in the absence of onsets at new locations. The results suggest that visual marking may be an attentional selection mechanism that significantly benefits visual search when (1) the observer has an appropriate search goal, (2) the goal necessitates inhibition of old objects, and (3) the new objects include a salient perceptual feature.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141652899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141652899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/BF03194805
DO - 10.3758/BF03194805
M3 - Article
VL - 65
SP - 667
EP - 677
JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics
JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics
SN - 1943-3921
IS - 5
ER -