Visual marking

A convergence of goal- and stimulus-driven processes during visual search

Paul Atchley, Sybil E. Jones, Lesa R Hoffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Watson and Humphreys (1997) proposed that visual marking is a goal-directed process that enhances visual search through the inhibition of old objects. In addition to the standard marking case with targets at new locations, included in Experiment 1 was a set of trials with targets always at old locations, as well as a set of trials with targets varying between new and old locations. The participants' performance when detecting the target at old locations was equivalent to their performance in the full-baseline condition when they knew the target would be at old locations, and was worse when the target appeared at old locations on 50% of the trials. Marking was observed when the target appeared at new locations. In Experiment 2, an offset paradigm was used to eliminate the influence of the salient abrupt-onset feature of the new objects. No significant benefits were found for targets at new locations in the absence of onsets at new locations. The results suggest that visual marking may be an attentional selection mechanism that significantly benefits visual search when (1) the observer has an appropriate search goal, (2) the goal necessitates inhibition of old objects, and (3) the new objects include a salient perceptual feature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)667-677
Number of pages11
JournalPerception and Psychophysics
Volume65
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

stimulus
Stimulus
Visual Search
experiment
performance
paradigm

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Visual marking : A convergence of goal- and stimulus-driven processes during visual search. / Atchley, Paul; Jones, Sybil E.; Hoffman, Lesa R.

In: Perception and Psychophysics, Vol. 65, No. 5, 01.01.2003, p. 667-677.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Atchley, Paul ; Jones, Sybil E. ; Hoffman, Lesa R. / Visual marking : A convergence of goal- and stimulus-driven processes during visual search. In: Perception and Psychophysics. 2003 ; Vol. 65, No. 5. pp. 667-677.
@article{17598967bdcd47fd81d00e4374df634c,
title = "Visual marking: A convergence of goal- and stimulus-driven processes during visual search",
abstract = "Watson and Humphreys (1997) proposed that visual marking is a goal-directed process that enhances visual search through the inhibition of old objects. In addition to the standard marking case with targets at new locations, included in Experiment 1 was a set of trials with targets always at old locations, as well as a set of trials with targets varying between new and old locations. The participants' performance when detecting the target at old locations was equivalent to their performance in the full-baseline condition when they knew the target would be at old locations, and was worse when the target appeared at old locations on 50{\%} of the trials. Marking was observed when the target appeared at new locations. In Experiment 2, an offset paradigm was used to eliminate the influence of the salient abrupt-onset feature of the new objects. No significant benefits were found for targets at new locations in the absence of onsets at new locations. The results suggest that visual marking may be an attentional selection mechanism that significantly benefits visual search when (1) the observer has an appropriate search goal, (2) the goal necessitates inhibition of old objects, and (3) the new objects include a salient perceptual feature.",
author = "Paul Atchley and Jones, {Sybil E.} and Hoffman, {Lesa R}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03194805",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "667--677",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual marking

T2 - A convergence of goal- and stimulus-driven processes during visual search

AU - Atchley, Paul

AU - Jones, Sybil E.

AU - Hoffman, Lesa R

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Watson and Humphreys (1997) proposed that visual marking is a goal-directed process that enhances visual search through the inhibition of old objects. In addition to the standard marking case with targets at new locations, included in Experiment 1 was a set of trials with targets always at old locations, as well as a set of trials with targets varying between new and old locations. The participants' performance when detecting the target at old locations was equivalent to their performance in the full-baseline condition when they knew the target would be at old locations, and was worse when the target appeared at old locations on 50% of the trials. Marking was observed when the target appeared at new locations. In Experiment 2, an offset paradigm was used to eliminate the influence of the salient abrupt-onset feature of the new objects. No significant benefits were found for targets at new locations in the absence of onsets at new locations. The results suggest that visual marking may be an attentional selection mechanism that significantly benefits visual search when (1) the observer has an appropriate search goal, (2) the goal necessitates inhibition of old objects, and (3) the new objects include a salient perceptual feature.

AB - Watson and Humphreys (1997) proposed that visual marking is a goal-directed process that enhances visual search through the inhibition of old objects. In addition to the standard marking case with targets at new locations, included in Experiment 1 was a set of trials with targets always at old locations, as well as a set of trials with targets varying between new and old locations. The participants' performance when detecting the target at old locations was equivalent to their performance in the full-baseline condition when they knew the target would be at old locations, and was worse when the target appeared at old locations on 50% of the trials. Marking was observed when the target appeared at new locations. In Experiment 2, an offset paradigm was used to eliminate the influence of the salient abrupt-onset feature of the new objects. No significant benefits were found for targets at new locations in the absence of onsets at new locations. The results suggest that visual marking may be an attentional selection mechanism that significantly benefits visual search when (1) the observer has an appropriate search goal, (2) the goal necessitates inhibition of old objects, and (3) the new objects include a salient perceptual feature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141652899&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141652899&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03194805

DO - 10.3758/BF03194805

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 667

EP - 677

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 5

ER -