Variability of gait is dependent on direction of progression: Implications for active control

Shane R. Wurdeman, Neil B. Huben, Nicholas Stergiou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Typical healthy walking displays greater variability in the mediolateral direction compared to the anteroposterior direction. This greater variability is thought to represent increased uncertainty in movement. As a result, it has been postulated that the mediolateral direction of gait requires more active control by the central nervous system while the anteroposterior direction is controlled through passive actions. However, this theory has only been tested on gait where progression occurs in the anteroposterior direction. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate how the amount of variability is affected if progression occurs in the mediolateral direction using a lateral stepping gait. Results showed the anteroposterior direction had a significantly greater amount of variability than the mediolateral direction (p<0.001). The results do not support current models of a partition of active control to different anatomical planes. Rather, it seems that other physical entities involved in motion, such as momentum and inertia, are able to decrease the dependence on active control from the central nervous system. In a lateral stepping gait, such physical entities were no longer assisting in the anteroposterior direction but had a larger impact in the mediolateral direction as it was the direction of progression. As a result variability in the anteroposterior direction increased. Thus, it is possible to infer increased reliance on active control from the central nervous system in the direction orthogonal to progression.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)653-659
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 23 2012

Fingerprint

Gait
Neurology
Momentum
Display devices
Central Nervous System
Direction compound
Walking
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • Gait
  • Lateral stability
  • Locomotion
  • Motor control
  • Variability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Variability of gait is dependent on direction of progression : Implications for active control. / Wurdeman, Shane R.; Huben, Neil B.; Stergiou, Nicholas.

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 45, No. 4, 23.02.2012, p. 653-659.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8a3ca26a4c804e46b374c6124359ce81,
title = "Variability of gait is dependent on direction of progression: Implications for active control",
abstract = "Typical healthy walking displays greater variability in the mediolateral direction compared to the anteroposterior direction. This greater variability is thought to represent increased uncertainty in movement. As a result, it has been postulated that the mediolateral direction of gait requires more active control by the central nervous system while the anteroposterior direction is controlled through passive actions. However, this theory has only been tested on gait where progression occurs in the anteroposterior direction. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate how the amount of variability is affected if progression occurs in the mediolateral direction using a lateral stepping gait. Results showed the anteroposterior direction had a significantly greater amount of variability than the mediolateral direction (p<0.001). The results do not support current models of a partition of active control to different anatomical planes. Rather, it seems that other physical entities involved in motion, such as momentum and inertia, are able to decrease the dependence on active control from the central nervous system. In a lateral stepping gait, such physical entities were no longer assisting in the anteroposterior direction but had a larger impact in the mediolateral direction as it was the direction of progression. As a result variability in the anteroposterior direction increased. Thus, it is possible to infer increased reliance on active control from the central nervous system in the direction orthogonal to progression.",
keywords = "Gait, Lateral stability, Locomotion, Motor control, Variability",
author = "Wurdeman, {Shane R.} and Huben, {Neil B.} and Nicholas Stergiou",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "653--659",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variability of gait is dependent on direction of progression

T2 - Implications for active control

AU - Wurdeman, Shane R.

AU - Huben, Neil B.

AU - Stergiou, Nicholas

PY - 2012/2/23

Y1 - 2012/2/23

N2 - Typical healthy walking displays greater variability in the mediolateral direction compared to the anteroposterior direction. This greater variability is thought to represent increased uncertainty in movement. As a result, it has been postulated that the mediolateral direction of gait requires more active control by the central nervous system while the anteroposterior direction is controlled through passive actions. However, this theory has only been tested on gait where progression occurs in the anteroposterior direction. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate how the amount of variability is affected if progression occurs in the mediolateral direction using a lateral stepping gait. Results showed the anteroposterior direction had a significantly greater amount of variability than the mediolateral direction (p<0.001). The results do not support current models of a partition of active control to different anatomical planes. Rather, it seems that other physical entities involved in motion, such as momentum and inertia, are able to decrease the dependence on active control from the central nervous system. In a lateral stepping gait, such physical entities were no longer assisting in the anteroposterior direction but had a larger impact in the mediolateral direction as it was the direction of progression. As a result variability in the anteroposterior direction increased. Thus, it is possible to infer increased reliance on active control from the central nervous system in the direction orthogonal to progression.

AB - Typical healthy walking displays greater variability in the mediolateral direction compared to the anteroposterior direction. This greater variability is thought to represent increased uncertainty in movement. As a result, it has been postulated that the mediolateral direction of gait requires more active control by the central nervous system while the anteroposterior direction is controlled through passive actions. However, this theory has only been tested on gait where progression occurs in the anteroposterior direction. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate how the amount of variability is affected if progression occurs in the mediolateral direction using a lateral stepping gait. Results showed the anteroposterior direction had a significantly greater amount of variability than the mediolateral direction (p<0.001). The results do not support current models of a partition of active control to different anatomical planes. Rather, it seems that other physical entities involved in motion, such as momentum and inertia, are able to decrease the dependence on active control from the central nervous system. In a lateral stepping gait, such physical entities were no longer assisting in the anteroposterior direction but had a larger impact in the mediolateral direction as it was the direction of progression. As a result variability in the anteroposterior direction increased. Thus, it is possible to infer increased reliance on active control from the central nervous system in the direction orthogonal to progression.

KW - Gait

KW - Lateral stability

KW - Locomotion

KW - Motor control

KW - Variability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856738300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856738300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 22245103

AN - SCOPUS:84856738300

VL - 45

SP - 653

EP - 659

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

IS - 4

ER -