Value of transesophageal echocardiography during complex or high-risk coronary interventions in the cardiac catheterization laboratory

Gregory S. Pavlides, Andrew M. Hauser, Patricia I. Dudlets, Steven L. Almany, Cindy L. Grines, William W. O'Neill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The increasing complexity of coronary intervention and the limitations of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic monitoring have facilitated the introduction of new imaging techniques in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has proved valuable for left ventricular (LV) monitoring during high-risk surgery, but its reported use in the cardiac catheterization laboratory has been limited. Accordingly, we assessed the feasibility and value of TEE during complex or high-risk coronary intervention in the catheterization laboratory. The TEE probe was successfully introduced in 53 of 54 (98%) attempted cases. The primary imaging goals were LV monitoring in 39 (74%), left main coronary artery (LMCA) imaging in 9 (17%) and both in 5 (9%) cases. LV monitoring was successful in 43 of the 44 (98%) attempted cases. In 25 (58%) of these, additional important observations were made by TEE that were not apparent by symptoms, or hemodynamic, electrocardiographic or radiographic monitoring. These included unexpected changes in regional myocardial function (n = 20), alteration in LV size (n = 2), exclusion of considered pericardial tamponade (n = 2) and detection of unsuspected mitral regurgitation (n = 1). Management of the interventional procedure was directly influenced by the findings of TEE in 11 of the 43 (26%) monitored cases. The LMCA was successfully visualized in 13 of the 14 (93%) attempted cases. In 11 of these, measurement of the stenotic lesion diameter by TEE correlated well with quantitative angiography both before (r = 0.83, standard error of the estimate = 0.01, p < 0.002) and after (r = 0.80, standard error of the estimate = 0.03, p < 0.005) intervention. All patients tolerated TEE well without complications. TEE during complex or high-risk coronary intervention is a feasible, safe and valuable tool for rapid detection of altered myocardial function and thus may influence clinical decisions during interventional procedure. In patients undergoing LMCA intervention, TEE accurately measures stenotic lesion diameter before and after intervention, providing a feasible noninvasive means for follow-up.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1452-1457
Number of pages6
JournalThe American Journal of Cardiology
Volume68
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1991

Fingerprint

Transesophageal Echocardiography
Cardiac Catheterization
Coronary Vessels
Hemodynamics
Cardiac Tamponade
Mitral Valve Insufficiency
Catheterization
Angiography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Value of transesophageal echocardiography during complex or high-risk coronary interventions in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. / Pavlides, Gregory S.; Hauser, Andrew M.; Dudlets, Patricia I.; Almany, Steven L.; Grines, Cindy L.; O'Neill, William W.

In: The American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 68, No. 15, 01.12.1991, p. 1452-1457.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pavlides, Gregory S. ; Hauser, Andrew M. ; Dudlets, Patricia I. ; Almany, Steven L. ; Grines, Cindy L. ; O'Neill, William W. / Value of transesophageal echocardiography during complex or high-risk coronary interventions in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. In: The American Journal of Cardiology. 1991 ; Vol. 68, No. 15. pp. 1452-1457.
@article{16eee4d625114279b67af795d0b196a5,
title = "Value of transesophageal echocardiography during complex or high-risk coronary interventions in the cardiac catheterization laboratory",
abstract = "The increasing complexity of coronary intervention and the limitations of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic monitoring have facilitated the introduction of new imaging techniques in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has proved valuable for left ventricular (LV) monitoring during high-risk surgery, but its reported use in the cardiac catheterization laboratory has been limited. Accordingly, we assessed the feasibility and value of TEE during complex or high-risk coronary intervention in the catheterization laboratory. The TEE probe was successfully introduced in 53 of 54 (98{\%}) attempted cases. The primary imaging goals were LV monitoring in 39 (74{\%}), left main coronary artery (LMCA) imaging in 9 (17{\%}) and both in 5 (9{\%}) cases. LV monitoring was successful in 43 of the 44 (98{\%}) attempted cases. In 25 (58{\%}) of these, additional important observations were made by TEE that were not apparent by symptoms, or hemodynamic, electrocardiographic or radiographic monitoring. These included unexpected changes in regional myocardial function (n = 20), alteration in LV size (n = 2), exclusion of considered pericardial tamponade (n = 2) and detection of unsuspected mitral regurgitation (n = 1). Management of the interventional procedure was directly influenced by the findings of TEE in 11 of the 43 (26{\%}) monitored cases. The LMCA was successfully visualized in 13 of the 14 (93{\%}) attempted cases. In 11 of these, measurement of the stenotic lesion diameter by TEE correlated well with quantitative angiography both before (r = 0.83, standard error of the estimate = 0.01, p < 0.002) and after (r = 0.80, standard error of the estimate = 0.03, p < 0.005) intervention. All patients tolerated TEE well without complications. TEE during complex or high-risk coronary intervention is a feasible, safe and valuable tool for rapid detection of altered myocardial function and thus may influence clinical decisions during interventional procedure. In patients undergoing LMCA intervention, TEE accurately measures stenotic lesion diameter before and after intervention, providing a feasible noninvasive means for follow-up.",
author = "Pavlides, {Gregory S.} and Hauser, {Andrew M.} and Dudlets, {Patricia I.} and Almany, {Steven L.} and Grines, {Cindy L.} and O'Neill, {William W.}",
year = "1991",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9149(91)90278-S",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "1452--1457",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "15",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Value of transesophageal echocardiography during complex or high-risk coronary interventions in the cardiac catheterization laboratory

AU - Pavlides, Gregory S.

AU - Hauser, Andrew M.

AU - Dudlets, Patricia I.

AU - Almany, Steven L.

AU - Grines, Cindy L.

AU - O'Neill, William W.

PY - 1991/12/1

Y1 - 1991/12/1

N2 - The increasing complexity of coronary intervention and the limitations of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic monitoring have facilitated the introduction of new imaging techniques in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has proved valuable for left ventricular (LV) monitoring during high-risk surgery, but its reported use in the cardiac catheterization laboratory has been limited. Accordingly, we assessed the feasibility and value of TEE during complex or high-risk coronary intervention in the catheterization laboratory. The TEE probe was successfully introduced in 53 of 54 (98%) attempted cases. The primary imaging goals were LV monitoring in 39 (74%), left main coronary artery (LMCA) imaging in 9 (17%) and both in 5 (9%) cases. LV monitoring was successful in 43 of the 44 (98%) attempted cases. In 25 (58%) of these, additional important observations were made by TEE that were not apparent by symptoms, or hemodynamic, electrocardiographic or radiographic monitoring. These included unexpected changes in regional myocardial function (n = 20), alteration in LV size (n = 2), exclusion of considered pericardial tamponade (n = 2) and detection of unsuspected mitral regurgitation (n = 1). Management of the interventional procedure was directly influenced by the findings of TEE in 11 of the 43 (26%) monitored cases. The LMCA was successfully visualized in 13 of the 14 (93%) attempted cases. In 11 of these, measurement of the stenotic lesion diameter by TEE correlated well with quantitative angiography both before (r = 0.83, standard error of the estimate = 0.01, p < 0.002) and after (r = 0.80, standard error of the estimate = 0.03, p < 0.005) intervention. All patients tolerated TEE well without complications. TEE during complex or high-risk coronary intervention is a feasible, safe and valuable tool for rapid detection of altered myocardial function and thus may influence clinical decisions during interventional procedure. In patients undergoing LMCA intervention, TEE accurately measures stenotic lesion diameter before and after intervention, providing a feasible noninvasive means for follow-up.

AB - The increasing complexity of coronary intervention and the limitations of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic monitoring have facilitated the introduction of new imaging techniques in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has proved valuable for left ventricular (LV) monitoring during high-risk surgery, but its reported use in the cardiac catheterization laboratory has been limited. Accordingly, we assessed the feasibility and value of TEE during complex or high-risk coronary intervention in the catheterization laboratory. The TEE probe was successfully introduced in 53 of 54 (98%) attempted cases. The primary imaging goals were LV monitoring in 39 (74%), left main coronary artery (LMCA) imaging in 9 (17%) and both in 5 (9%) cases. LV monitoring was successful in 43 of the 44 (98%) attempted cases. In 25 (58%) of these, additional important observations were made by TEE that were not apparent by symptoms, or hemodynamic, electrocardiographic or radiographic monitoring. These included unexpected changes in regional myocardial function (n = 20), alteration in LV size (n = 2), exclusion of considered pericardial tamponade (n = 2) and detection of unsuspected mitral regurgitation (n = 1). Management of the interventional procedure was directly influenced by the findings of TEE in 11 of the 43 (26%) monitored cases. The LMCA was successfully visualized in 13 of the 14 (93%) attempted cases. In 11 of these, measurement of the stenotic lesion diameter by TEE correlated well with quantitative angiography both before (r = 0.83, standard error of the estimate = 0.01, p < 0.002) and after (r = 0.80, standard error of the estimate = 0.03, p < 0.005) intervention. All patients tolerated TEE well without complications. TEE during complex or high-risk coronary intervention is a feasible, safe and valuable tool for rapid detection of altered myocardial function and thus may influence clinical decisions during interventional procedure. In patients undergoing LMCA intervention, TEE accurately measures stenotic lesion diameter before and after intervention, providing a feasible noninvasive means for follow-up.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026329109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026329109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90278-S

DO - 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90278-S

M3 - Article

C2 - 1746426

AN - SCOPUS:0026329109

VL - 68

SP - 1452

EP - 1457

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 15

ER -