Validation of inertial measurement units for upper body kinematics

Melissa M.B. Morrow, Bethany Lowndes, Emma Fortune, Kenton R. Kaufman, M. Susan Hallbeck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to validate a commercially available inertial measurement unit (IMU) system against a standard lab-based motion capture system for the measurement of shoulder elevation, elbow flexion, trunk flexion/extension, and neck flexion/extension kinematics. The validation analyses were applied to 6 surgical faculty members performing a standard, simulated surgical training task that mimics minimally invasive surgery. Three-dimensional joint kinematics were simultaneously recorded by an optical motion capture system and an IMU system with 6 sensors placed on the head, chest, and bilateral upper and lower arms. The sensor-to-segment axes alignment was accomplished manually. The IMU neck and trunk IMU flexion/extension angles were accurate to within 2.9 ± 0.9 degrees and 1.6 ± 1.1°, respectively. The IMU shoulder elevation measure was accurate to within 6.8 ± 2.7° and the elbow flexion measure was accurate to within 8.2 ± 2.8°. In the Bland-Altman analyses, there were no significant systematic errors present; however, there was a significant inversely proportional error across all joints. As the gold standard measurement increased, the IMU underestimated the magnitude of the joint angle. This study reports acceptable accuracy of a commercially available IMU system; however, results should be interpreted as protocol specific.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)227-232
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of applied biomechanics
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Biomechanical Phenomena
Joints
Elbow
Neck
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Arm
Thorax
Head

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Ergonomics
  • IMU
  • Shoulder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Validation of inertial measurement units for upper body kinematics. / Morrow, Melissa M.B.; Lowndes, Bethany; Fortune, Emma; Kaufman, Kenton R.; Hallbeck, M. Susan.

In: Journal of applied biomechanics, Vol. 33, No. 3, 06.2017, p. 227-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morrow, Melissa M.B. ; Lowndes, Bethany ; Fortune, Emma ; Kaufman, Kenton R. ; Hallbeck, M. Susan. / Validation of inertial measurement units for upper body kinematics. In: Journal of applied biomechanics. 2017 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 227-232.
@article{01bbeb10599f43cf90181cb482147708,
title = "Validation of inertial measurement units for upper body kinematics",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to validate a commercially available inertial measurement unit (IMU) system against a standard lab-based motion capture system for the measurement of shoulder elevation, elbow flexion, trunk flexion/extension, and neck flexion/extension kinematics. The validation analyses were applied to 6 surgical faculty members performing a standard, simulated surgical training task that mimics minimally invasive surgery. Three-dimensional joint kinematics were simultaneously recorded by an optical motion capture system and an IMU system with 6 sensors placed on the head, chest, and bilateral upper and lower arms. The sensor-to-segment axes alignment was accomplished manually. The IMU neck and trunk IMU flexion/extension angles were accurate to within 2.9 ± 0.9 degrees and 1.6 ± 1.1°, respectively. The IMU shoulder elevation measure was accurate to within 6.8 ± 2.7° and the elbow flexion measure was accurate to within 8.2 ± 2.8°. In the Bland-Altman analyses, there were no significant systematic errors present; however, there was a significant inversely proportional error across all joints. As the gold standard measurement increased, the IMU underestimated the magnitude of the joint angle. This study reports acceptable accuracy of a commercially available IMU system; however, results should be interpreted as protocol specific.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Ergonomics, IMU, Shoulder",
author = "Morrow, {Melissa M.B.} and Bethany Lowndes and Emma Fortune and Kaufman, {Kenton R.} and Hallbeck, {M. Susan}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1123/jab.2016-0120",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "227--232",
journal = "Journal of Applied Biomechanics",
issn = "1065-8483",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of inertial measurement units for upper body kinematics

AU - Morrow, Melissa M.B.

AU - Lowndes, Bethany

AU - Fortune, Emma

AU - Kaufman, Kenton R.

AU - Hallbeck, M. Susan

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - The purpose of this study was to validate a commercially available inertial measurement unit (IMU) system against a standard lab-based motion capture system for the measurement of shoulder elevation, elbow flexion, trunk flexion/extension, and neck flexion/extension kinematics. The validation analyses were applied to 6 surgical faculty members performing a standard, simulated surgical training task that mimics minimally invasive surgery. Three-dimensional joint kinematics were simultaneously recorded by an optical motion capture system and an IMU system with 6 sensors placed on the head, chest, and bilateral upper and lower arms. The sensor-to-segment axes alignment was accomplished manually. The IMU neck and trunk IMU flexion/extension angles were accurate to within 2.9 ± 0.9 degrees and 1.6 ± 1.1°, respectively. The IMU shoulder elevation measure was accurate to within 6.8 ± 2.7° and the elbow flexion measure was accurate to within 8.2 ± 2.8°. In the Bland-Altman analyses, there were no significant systematic errors present; however, there was a significant inversely proportional error across all joints. As the gold standard measurement increased, the IMU underestimated the magnitude of the joint angle. This study reports acceptable accuracy of a commercially available IMU system; however, results should be interpreted as protocol specific.

AB - The purpose of this study was to validate a commercially available inertial measurement unit (IMU) system against a standard lab-based motion capture system for the measurement of shoulder elevation, elbow flexion, trunk flexion/extension, and neck flexion/extension kinematics. The validation analyses were applied to 6 surgical faculty members performing a standard, simulated surgical training task that mimics minimally invasive surgery. Three-dimensional joint kinematics were simultaneously recorded by an optical motion capture system and an IMU system with 6 sensors placed on the head, chest, and bilateral upper and lower arms. The sensor-to-segment axes alignment was accomplished manually. The IMU neck and trunk IMU flexion/extension angles were accurate to within 2.9 ± 0.9 degrees and 1.6 ± 1.1°, respectively. The IMU shoulder elevation measure was accurate to within 6.8 ± 2.7° and the elbow flexion measure was accurate to within 8.2 ± 2.8°. In the Bland-Altman analyses, there were no significant systematic errors present; however, there was a significant inversely proportional error across all joints. As the gold standard measurement increased, the IMU underestimated the magnitude of the joint angle. This study reports acceptable accuracy of a commercially available IMU system; however, results should be interpreted as protocol specific.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Ergonomics

KW - IMU

KW - Shoulder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027079590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027079590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/jab.2016-0120

DO - 10.1123/jab.2016-0120

M3 - Article

C2 - 27918696

AN - SCOPUS:85027079590

VL - 33

SP - 227

EP - 232

JO - Journal of Applied Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Applied Biomechanics

SN - 1065-8483

IS - 3

ER -