Utilizing the RE-AIM framework to understand adoption of nutrition policies at food pantries across the USA

Meagan J. Helmick, Amy L. Yaroch, Courtney A. Parks, Paul A. Estabrooks, Jennie L. Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Emergency food networks consist of food banks, food pantries, and other feeding programs. Food pantries help supplement the diets of low-income populations through direct distribution of food. There is a gap in understanding whether food pantries are adopting nutrition policies to guide food donation and distribution. Guided by the RE-AIM framework, which has been applied to public health policies, this study aimed to determine the adoption of nutrition policies at food pantries across the USA. A secondary research question was to determine if the perceived barriers that food pantries associate with distributing healthful foods differed among pantries with a formal, informal, or no policy. A cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed to a national sample of food pantry directors (N = 5,500). The response rate for the survey was 28% (n = 1,539). Survey respondents were categorized by policy and analyses were conducted to determine differences between the three groups in characteristics and perceived barriers to distributing healthful foods. Two hundred eighty-two pantries (20.9%) were identified as having a formal nutrition policy, 677 (50.2%) were determined to have an informal policy, and 389 (28.9%) had no policy. There were significant differences between mean barrier scores and policy types for 8 of the 10 barriers. More research is needed to better understand how nutrition policies affect donations and distribution of food at food pantries. Using additional RE-AIM dimensions can allow for researchers to fully understand the role these policies have on the nutritional quality of food at food pantries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1120-1121
Number of pages2
JournalTranslational behavioral medicine
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 11 2019

Fingerprint

Nutrition Policy
Food
Policy Making
Nutritive Value
Poverty
Public Policy
Health Policy
Research

Keywords

  • Adoption rate
  • Food pantries
  • Nutrition policy
  • RE-AIM

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Utilizing the RE-AIM framework to understand adoption of nutrition policies at food pantries across the USA. / Helmick, Meagan J.; Yaroch, Amy L.; Parks, Courtney A.; Estabrooks, Paul A.; Hill, Jennie L.

In: Translational behavioral medicine, Vol. 9, No. 6, 11.10.2019, p. 1120-1121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Helmick, Meagan J. ; Yaroch, Amy L. ; Parks, Courtney A. ; Estabrooks, Paul A. ; Hill, Jennie L. / Utilizing the RE-AIM framework to understand adoption of nutrition policies at food pantries across the USA. In: Translational behavioral medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 6. pp. 1120-1121.
@article{5ad12e0f8c9c4c98abfb2a2d28c98301,
title = "Utilizing the RE-AIM framework to understand adoption of nutrition policies at food pantries across the USA",
abstract = "Emergency food networks consist of food banks, food pantries, and other feeding programs. Food pantries help supplement the diets of low-income populations through direct distribution of food. There is a gap in understanding whether food pantries are adopting nutrition policies to guide food donation and distribution. Guided by the RE-AIM framework, which has been applied to public health policies, this study aimed to determine the adoption of nutrition policies at food pantries across the USA. A secondary research question was to determine if the perceived barriers that food pantries associate with distributing healthful foods differed among pantries with a formal, informal, or no policy. A cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed to a national sample of food pantry directors (N = 5,500). The response rate for the survey was 28{\%} (n = 1,539). Survey respondents were categorized by policy and analyses were conducted to determine differences between the three groups in characteristics and perceived barriers to distributing healthful foods. Two hundred eighty-two pantries (20.9{\%}) were identified as having a formal nutrition policy, 677 (50.2{\%}) were determined to have an informal policy, and 389 (28.9{\%}) had no policy. There were significant differences between mean barrier scores and policy types for 8 of the 10 barriers. More research is needed to better understand how nutrition policies affect donations and distribution of food at food pantries. Using additional RE-AIM dimensions can allow for researchers to fully understand the role these policies have on the nutritional quality of food at food pantries.",
keywords = "Adoption rate, Food pantries, Nutrition policy, RE-AIM",
author = "Helmick, {Meagan J.} and Yaroch, {Amy L.} and Parks, {Courtney A.} and Estabrooks, {Paul A.} and Hill, {Jennie L.}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1093/tbm/ibz036",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "1120--1121",
journal = "Translational Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "1869-6716",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utilizing the RE-AIM framework to understand adoption of nutrition policies at food pantries across the USA

AU - Helmick, Meagan J.

AU - Yaroch, Amy L.

AU - Parks, Courtney A.

AU - Estabrooks, Paul A.

AU - Hill, Jennie L.

PY - 2019/10/11

Y1 - 2019/10/11

N2 - Emergency food networks consist of food banks, food pantries, and other feeding programs. Food pantries help supplement the diets of low-income populations through direct distribution of food. There is a gap in understanding whether food pantries are adopting nutrition policies to guide food donation and distribution. Guided by the RE-AIM framework, which has been applied to public health policies, this study aimed to determine the adoption of nutrition policies at food pantries across the USA. A secondary research question was to determine if the perceived barriers that food pantries associate with distributing healthful foods differed among pantries with a formal, informal, or no policy. A cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed to a national sample of food pantry directors (N = 5,500). The response rate for the survey was 28% (n = 1,539). Survey respondents were categorized by policy and analyses were conducted to determine differences between the three groups in characteristics and perceived barriers to distributing healthful foods. Two hundred eighty-two pantries (20.9%) were identified as having a formal nutrition policy, 677 (50.2%) were determined to have an informal policy, and 389 (28.9%) had no policy. There were significant differences between mean barrier scores and policy types for 8 of the 10 barriers. More research is needed to better understand how nutrition policies affect donations and distribution of food at food pantries. Using additional RE-AIM dimensions can allow for researchers to fully understand the role these policies have on the nutritional quality of food at food pantries.

AB - Emergency food networks consist of food banks, food pantries, and other feeding programs. Food pantries help supplement the diets of low-income populations through direct distribution of food. There is a gap in understanding whether food pantries are adopting nutrition policies to guide food donation and distribution. Guided by the RE-AIM framework, which has been applied to public health policies, this study aimed to determine the adoption of nutrition policies at food pantries across the USA. A secondary research question was to determine if the perceived barriers that food pantries associate with distributing healthful foods differed among pantries with a formal, informal, or no policy. A cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed to a national sample of food pantry directors (N = 5,500). The response rate for the survey was 28% (n = 1,539). Survey respondents were categorized by policy and analyses were conducted to determine differences between the three groups in characteristics and perceived barriers to distributing healthful foods. Two hundred eighty-two pantries (20.9%) were identified as having a formal nutrition policy, 677 (50.2%) were determined to have an informal policy, and 389 (28.9%) had no policy. There were significant differences between mean barrier scores and policy types for 8 of the 10 barriers. More research is needed to better understand how nutrition policies affect donations and distribution of food at food pantries. Using additional RE-AIM dimensions can allow for researchers to fully understand the role these policies have on the nutritional quality of food at food pantries.

KW - Adoption rate

KW - Food pantries

KW - Nutrition policy

KW - RE-AIM

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074350223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074350223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/tbm/ibz036

DO - 10.1093/tbm/ibz036

M3 - Article

C2 - 30847480

AN - SCOPUS:85074350223

VL - 9

SP - 1120

EP - 1121

JO - Translational Behavioral Medicine

JF - Translational Behavioral Medicine

SN - 1869-6716

IS - 6

ER -