Using submaximal contractions to predict the maximum force-generating ability of muscles

Sarah Flynn, Brian A. Knarr, Ramu Perumal, Trisha M. Kesar, Stuart A. Binder-Macleod

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Muscle weakness can be caused by decreases in either the maximum force-generating ability of a muscle (MFGA) or neural drive from the nervous system (e.g., after a stroke). Presently, there is no agreed-upon practical method for calculating the MFGA in individuals with central nervous system pathology. The purpose of this study was to identify the best method for determining MFGA. Methods: The predicted and estimated MFGA of the muscles of 23 non-neurologically impaired subjects (13 males, 21.9 ± 1.9 years) were compared using the burst superimposition, twitch interpolation, doublet interpolation, twitch-to-tetanus ratio, and the adjusted burst superimposition methods. Results: The adjusted burst superimposition test was the most accurate predictor of MFGA. Conclusions: Further testing is needed to validate the use of the adjusted burst superimposition test in a neurologically impaired population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)849-858
Number of pages10
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012

Fingerprint

Muscles
Muscle Weakness
Tetanus
Nervous System
Central Nervous System
Stroke
Pathology
Population

Keywords

  • Burst superimposition
  • Doublet interpolation
  • Maximum force-generating ability
  • Twitch

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Using submaximal contractions to predict the maximum force-generating ability of muscles. / Flynn, Sarah; Knarr, Brian A.; Perumal, Ramu; Kesar, Trisha M.; Binder-Macleod, Stuart A.

In: Muscle and Nerve, Vol. 45, No. 6, 01.06.2012, p. 849-858.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Flynn, Sarah ; Knarr, Brian A. ; Perumal, Ramu ; Kesar, Trisha M. ; Binder-Macleod, Stuart A. / Using submaximal contractions to predict the maximum force-generating ability of muscles. In: Muscle and Nerve. 2012 ; Vol. 45, No. 6. pp. 849-858.
@article{bda84d224b5d499987b123b470b16f2d,
title = "Using submaximal contractions to predict the maximum force-generating ability of muscles",
abstract = "Introduction: Muscle weakness can be caused by decreases in either the maximum force-generating ability of a muscle (MFGA) or neural drive from the nervous system (e.g., after a stroke). Presently, there is no agreed-upon practical method for calculating the MFGA in individuals with central nervous system pathology. The purpose of this study was to identify the best method for determining MFGA. Methods: The predicted and estimated MFGA of the muscles of 23 non-neurologically impaired subjects (13 males, 21.9 ± 1.9 years) were compared using the burst superimposition, twitch interpolation, doublet interpolation, twitch-to-tetanus ratio, and the adjusted burst superimposition methods. Results: The adjusted burst superimposition test was the most accurate predictor of MFGA. Conclusions: Further testing is needed to validate the use of the adjusted burst superimposition test in a neurologically impaired population.",
keywords = "Burst superimposition, Doublet interpolation, Maximum force-generating ability, Twitch",
author = "Sarah Flynn and Knarr, {Brian A.} and Ramu Perumal and Kesar, {Trisha M.} and Binder-Macleod, {Stuart A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/mus.23254",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "849--858",
journal = "Muscle & nerve",
issn = "0148-639X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using submaximal contractions to predict the maximum force-generating ability of muscles

AU - Flynn, Sarah

AU - Knarr, Brian A.

AU - Perumal, Ramu

AU - Kesar, Trisha M.

AU - Binder-Macleod, Stuart A.

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - Introduction: Muscle weakness can be caused by decreases in either the maximum force-generating ability of a muscle (MFGA) or neural drive from the nervous system (e.g., after a stroke). Presently, there is no agreed-upon practical method for calculating the MFGA in individuals with central nervous system pathology. The purpose of this study was to identify the best method for determining MFGA. Methods: The predicted and estimated MFGA of the muscles of 23 non-neurologically impaired subjects (13 males, 21.9 ± 1.9 years) were compared using the burst superimposition, twitch interpolation, doublet interpolation, twitch-to-tetanus ratio, and the adjusted burst superimposition methods. Results: The adjusted burst superimposition test was the most accurate predictor of MFGA. Conclusions: Further testing is needed to validate the use of the adjusted burst superimposition test in a neurologically impaired population.

AB - Introduction: Muscle weakness can be caused by decreases in either the maximum force-generating ability of a muscle (MFGA) or neural drive from the nervous system (e.g., after a stroke). Presently, there is no agreed-upon practical method for calculating the MFGA in individuals with central nervous system pathology. The purpose of this study was to identify the best method for determining MFGA. Methods: The predicted and estimated MFGA of the muscles of 23 non-neurologically impaired subjects (13 males, 21.9 ± 1.9 years) were compared using the burst superimposition, twitch interpolation, doublet interpolation, twitch-to-tetanus ratio, and the adjusted burst superimposition methods. Results: The adjusted burst superimposition test was the most accurate predictor of MFGA. Conclusions: Further testing is needed to validate the use of the adjusted burst superimposition test in a neurologically impaired population.

KW - Burst superimposition

KW - Doublet interpolation

KW - Maximum force-generating ability

KW - Twitch

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860898126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860898126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mus.23254

DO - 10.1002/mus.23254

M3 - Article

C2 - 22581539

AN - SCOPUS:84860898126

VL - 45

SP - 849

EP - 858

JO - Muscle & nerve

JF - Muscle & nerve

SN - 0148-639X

IS - 6

ER -