Using a Simple Leaf Color Chart to Estimate Leaf and Canopy Chlorophyll a Content in Maize (Zea mays)

Anthony Nguy-Robertson, Yi Peng, Timothy Arkebauer, David Scoby, James Schepers, Anatoly Gitelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study utilized a leaf color chart (LCC) to characterize the variation in leaf chlorophyll and estimate canopy chlorophyll in maize (Zea mays). The LCC consisted of four levels of greenness and was used to sort maize leaves in 2011 for three fields near Mead, Nebraska, USA. Leaf chlorophyll content for each color chart class was determined using two leaf-level sensors. The variation within each LCC class was reasonable (CV < 56%). The darkest color class predominated and indicated adequate fertilization rates using a Minolta SPAD-502 meter. Canopy chlorophyll content was estimated using destructively measured leaf area index (LAI) and the LCC. This approach was verified with a method utilizing canopy reflectance collected by both satellite imagery and a four-band radiometer. The error between the two methods was reasonable (RMSE = 0.55–0.88 g m−2; CV = 25.6–50.4%), indicating that both leaf and canopy chlorophyll can be estimated cheaply without a wet lab or field-based sensors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2734-2745
Number of pages12
JournalCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis
Volume46
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 30 2015

Fingerprint

chlorophyll a
Zea mays
maize
canopy
chlorophyll
corn
color
leaves
sensors (equipment)
mead
sensor
canopy reflectance
radiometers
leaf area index
radiometer
satellite imagery
reflectance
methodology

Keywords

  • Leaf area index
  • MERIS
  • SPAD
  • remote sensing
  • stalk nitrate test
  • vegetation indices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Soil Science

Cite this

Using a Simple Leaf Color Chart to Estimate Leaf and Canopy Chlorophyll a Content in Maize (Zea mays). / Nguy-Robertson, Anthony; Peng, Yi; Arkebauer, Timothy; Scoby, David; Schepers, James; Gitelson, Anatoly.

In: Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, Vol. 46, No. 21, 30.11.2015, p. 2734-2745.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nguy-Robertson, Anthony ; Peng, Yi ; Arkebauer, Timothy ; Scoby, David ; Schepers, James ; Gitelson, Anatoly. / Using a Simple Leaf Color Chart to Estimate Leaf and Canopy Chlorophyll a Content in Maize (Zea mays). In: Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2015 ; Vol. 46, No. 21. pp. 2734-2745.
@article{194a1e26f45b4afdac09f90697df79e4,
title = "Using a Simple Leaf Color Chart to Estimate Leaf and Canopy Chlorophyll a Content in Maize (Zea mays)",
abstract = "This study utilized a leaf color chart (LCC) to characterize the variation in leaf chlorophyll and estimate canopy chlorophyll in maize (Zea mays). The LCC consisted of four levels of greenness and was used to sort maize leaves in 2011 for three fields near Mead, Nebraska, USA. Leaf chlorophyll content for each color chart class was determined using two leaf-level sensors. The variation within each LCC class was reasonable (CV < 56{\%}). The darkest color class predominated and indicated adequate fertilization rates using a Minolta SPAD-502 meter. Canopy chlorophyll content was estimated using destructively measured leaf area index (LAI) and the LCC. This approach was verified with a method utilizing canopy reflectance collected by both satellite imagery and a four-band radiometer. The error between the two methods was reasonable (RMSE = 0.55–0.88 g m−2; CV = 25.6–50.4{\%}), indicating that both leaf and canopy chlorophyll can be estimated cheaply without a wet lab or field-based sensors.",
keywords = "Leaf area index, MERIS, SPAD, remote sensing, stalk nitrate test, vegetation indices",
author = "Anthony Nguy-Robertson and Yi Peng and Timothy Arkebauer and David Scoby and James Schepers and Anatoly Gitelson",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1080/00103624.2015.1093639",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "2734--2745",
journal = "Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis",
issn = "0010-3624",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using a Simple Leaf Color Chart to Estimate Leaf and Canopy Chlorophyll a Content in Maize (Zea mays)

AU - Nguy-Robertson, Anthony

AU - Peng, Yi

AU - Arkebauer, Timothy

AU - Scoby, David

AU - Schepers, James

AU - Gitelson, Anatoly

PY - 2015/11/30

Y1 - 2015/11/30

N2 - This study utilized a leaf color chart (LCC) to characterize the variation in leaf chlorophyll and estimate canopy chlorophyll in maize (Zea mays). The LCC consisted of four levels of greenness and was used to sort maize leaves in 2011 for three fields near Mead, Nebraska, USA. Leaf chlorophyll content for each color chart class was determined using two leaf-level sensors. The variation within each LCC class was reasonable (CV < 56%). The darkest color class predominated and indicated adequate fertilization rates using a Minolta SPAD-502 meter. Canopy chlorophyll content was estimated using destructively measured leaf area index (LAI) and the LCC. This approach was verified with a method utilizing canopy reflectance collected by both satellite imagery and a four-band radiometer. The error between the two methods was reasonable (RMSE = 0.55–0.88 g m−2; CV = 25.6–50.4%), indicating that both leaf and canopy chlorophyll can be estimated cheaply without a wet lab or field-based sensors.

AB - This study utilized a leaf color chart (LCC) to characterize the variation in leaf chlorophyll and estimate canopy chlorophyll in maize (Zea mays). The LCC consisted of four levels of greenness and was used to sort maize leaves in 2011 for three fields near Mead, Nebraska, USA. Leaf chlorophyll content for each color chart class was determined using two leaf-level sensors. The variation within each LCC class was reasonable (CV < 56%). The darkest color class predominated and indicated adequate fertilization rates using a Minolta SPAD-502 meter. Canopy chlorophyll content was estimated using destructively measured leaf area index (LAI) and the LCC. This approach was verified with a method utilizing canopy reflectance collected by both satellite imagery and a four-band radiometer. The error between the two methods was reasonable (RMSE = 0.55–0.88 g m−2; CV = 25.6–50.4%), indicating that both leaf and canopy chlorophyll can be estimated cheaply without a wet lab or field-based sensors.

KW - Leaf area index

KW - MERIS

KW - SPAD

KW - remote sensing

KW - stalk nitrate test

KW - vegetation indices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948714690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948714690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00103624.2015.1093639

DO - 10.1080/00103624.2015.1093639

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84948714690

VL - 46

SP - 2734

EP - 2745

JO - Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

JF - Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

SN - 0010-3624

IS - 21

ER -