Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness

Cathleen C. Piazza, Wayne W. Fisher, Louis P. Hagopian, Lynn G. Bowman, Lisa Toole

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

101 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A choice assessment has been found to be a more accurate method of identifying preferences than is single-item presentation. However, it is not clear whether the effectiveness of reinforcement varies positively with the degree of preference (i.e., whether the relative preference based on the results of a choice assessment predicts relative reinforcer effectiveness). In the current study, we attempted to address this question by categorizing stimuli as high, middle, and low preference based on the results of a choice assessment, and then comparing the reinforcing effectiveness of these stimuli using a concurrent operants paradigm. High-preference stimuli consistently functioned as reinforcers for all 4 clients. Middle-preference stimuli functioned as reinforcers for 2 clients, but only when compared with low-preference stimuli. Low-preference stimuli did not function as reinforcers when compared to high- and middle-preference stimuli. These results suggest that a choice assessment can be used to predict the relative reinforcing value of various stimuli, which, in turn, may help to improve programs for clients with severe to profound disabilities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of applied behavior analysis
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

stimulus
Stimulus
reinforcement
disability
paradigm
Values

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Concurrent operants
  • Developmental disabilities
  • Predictive validity
  • Reinforcer preference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness. / Piazza, Cathleen C.; Fisher, Wayne W.; Hagopian, Louis P.; Bowman, Lynn G.; Toole, Lisa.

In: Journal of applied behavior analysis, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.01.1996, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Piazza, Cathleen C. ; Fisher, Wayne W. ; Hagopian, Louis P. ; Bowman, Lynn G. ; Toole, Lisa. / Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness. In: Journal of applied behavior analysis. 1996 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 1-9.
@article{5c739b8c4ae741d08d54159b44b6482a,
title = "Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness",
abstract = "A choice assessment has been found to be a more accurate method of identifying preferences than is single-item presentation. However, it is not clear whether the effectiveness of reinforcement varies positively with the degree of preference (i.e., whether the relative preference based on the results of a choice assessment predicts relative reinforcer effectiveness). In the current study, we attempted to address this question by categorizing stimuli as high, middle, and low preference based on the results of a choice assessment, and then comparing the reinforcing effectiveness of these stimuli using a concurrent operants paradigm. High-preference stimuli consistently functioned as reinforcers for all 4 clients. Middle-preference stimuli functioned as reinforcers for 2 clients, but only when compared with low-preference stimuli. Low-preference stimuli did not function as reinforcers when compared to high- and middle-preference stimuli. These results suggest that a choice assessment can be used to predict the relative reinforcing value of various stimuli, which, in turn, may help to improve programs for clients with severe to profound disabilities.",
keywords = "Assessment, Concurrent operants, Developmental disabilities, Predictive validity, Reinforcer preference",
author = "Piazza, {Cathleen C.} and Fisher, {Wayne W.} and Hagopian, {Louis P.} and Bowman, {Lynn G.} and Lisa Toole",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1901/jaba.1996.29-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness

AU - Piazza, Cathleen C.

AU - Fisher, Wayne W.

AU - Hagopian, Louis P.

AU - Bowman, Lynn G.

AU - Toole, Lisa

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - A choice assessment has been found to be a more accurate method of identifying preferences than is single-item presentation. However, it is not clear whether the effectiveness of reinforcement varies positively with the degree of preference (i.e., whether the relative preference based on the results of a choice assessment predicts relative reinforcer effectiveness). In the current study, we attempted to address this question by categorizing stimuli as high, middle, and low preference based on the results of a choice assessment, and then comparing the reinforcing effectiveness of these stimuli using a concurrent operants paradigm. High-preference stimuli consistently functioned as reinforcers for all 4 clients. Middle-preference stimuli functioned as reinforcers for 2 clients, but only when compared with low-preference stimuli. Low-preference stimuli did not function as reinforcers when compared to high- and middle-preference stimuli. These results suggest that a choice assessment can be used to predict the relative reinforcing value of various stimuli, which, in turn, may help to improve programs for clients with severe to profound disabilities.

AB - A choice assessment has been found to be a more accurate method of identifying preferences than is single-item presentation. However, it is not clear whether the effectiveness of reinforcement varies positively with the degree of preference (i.e., whether the relative preference based on the results of a choice assessment predicts relative reinforcer effectiveness). In the current study, we attempted to address this question by categorizing stimuli as high, middle, and low preference based on the results of a choice assessment, and then comparing the reinforcing effectiveness of these stimuli using a concurrent operants paradigm. High-preference stimuli consistently functioned as reinforcers for all 4 clients. Middle-preference stimuli functioned as reinforcers for 2 clients, but only when compared with low-preference stimuli. Low-preference stimuli did not function as reinforcers when compared to high- and middle-preference stimuli. These results suggest that a choice assessment can be used to predict the relative reinforcing value of various stimuli, which, in turn, may help to improve programs for clients with severe to profound disabilities.

KW - Assessment

KW - Concurrent operants

KW - Developmental disabilities

KW - Predictive validity

KW - Reinforcer preference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030093467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030093467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-1

DO - 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 8881340

AN - SCOPUS:0030093467

VL - 29

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 1

ER -