Using a Calendar and Explanatory Instructions to Aid Within-household Selection in Mail Surveys

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although researchers can easily select probability samples of addresses using the U.S. Postal Service’s Delivery Sequence File, randomly selecting respondents within households for surveys remains challenging. Researchers often place within-household selection instructions, such as the next or last birthday methods, in survey cover letters to select respondents. Studies show that up to 30% of selections are inaccurate and samples tend not to represent key demographics. This article tests two design elements—a calendar and explanatory wording of selection instructions in cover letters—to aid and motivate households to carry out selection procedures accurately. We empirically examine these elements in two mail surveys of Nebraskans—the 2012 Nebraska Annual Social Indicators Survey and 2013 Nebraska Trees and Forest Survey. We find that neither the calendar nor the explanatory wording adversely affected response rates but that neither improved the representativeness of the completed samples and that the calendar actually reduced selection accuracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)64-78
Number of pages15
JournalField Methods
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

mail survey
instruction
postal service
selection procedure
social indicators

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology

Cite this

Using a Calendar and Explanatory Instructions to Aid Within-household Selection in Mail Surveys. / Stange, Mathew; Smyth, Jolene D.; Olson, Kristen.

In: Field Methods, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 64-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{cf15fef6872348e1a758566289ea438e,
title = "Using a Calendar and Explanatory Instructions to Aid Within-household Selection in Mail Surveys",
abstract = "Although researchers can easily select probability samples of addresses using the U.S. Postal Service’s Delivery Sequence File, randomly selecting respondents within households for surveys remains challenging. Researchers often place within-household selection instructions, such as the next or last birthday methods, in survey cover letters to select respondents. Studies show that up to 30{\%} of selections are inaccurate and samples tend not to represent key demographics. This article tests two design elements—a calendar and explanatory wording of selection instructions in cover letters—to aid and motivate households to carry out selection procedures accurately. We empirically examine these elements in two mail surveys of Nebraskans—the 2012 Nebraska Annual Social Indicators Survey and 2013 Nebraska Trees and Forest Survey. We find that neither the calendar nor the explanatory wording adversely affected response rates but that neither improved the representativeness of the completed samples and that the calendar actually reduced selection accuracy.",
author = "Mathew Stange and Smyth, {Jolene D.} and Kristen Olson",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1525822X15604825",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "64--78",
journal = "Field Methods",
issn = "1525-822X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using a Calendar and Explanatory Instructions to Aid Within-household Selection in Mail Surveys

AU - Stange, Mathew

AU - Smyth, Jolene D.

AU - Olson, Kristen

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Although researchers can easily select probability samples of addresses using the U.S. Postal Service’s Delivery Sequence File, randomly selecting respondents within households for surveys remains challenging. Researchers often place within-household selection instructions, such as the next or last birthday methods, in survey cover letters to select respondents. Studies show that up to 30% of selections are inaccurate and samples tend not to represent key demographics. This article tests two design elements—a calendar and explanatory wording of selection instructions in cover letters—to aid and motivate households to carry out selection procedures accurately. We empirically examine these elements in two mail surveys of Nebraskans—the 2012 Nebraska Annual Social Indicators Survey and 2013 Nebraska Trees and Forest Survey. We find that neither the calendar nor the explanatory wording adversely affected response rates but that neither improved the representativeness of the completed samples and that the calendar actually reduced selection accuracy.

AB - Although researchers can easily select probability samples of addresses using the U.S. Postal Service’s Delivery Sequence File, randomly selecting respondents within households for surveys remains challenging. Researchers often place within-household selection instructions, such as the next or last birthday methods, in survey cover letters to select respondents. Studies show that up to 30% of selections are inaccurate and samples tend not to represent key demographics. This article tests two design elements—a calendar and explanatory wording of selection instructions in cover letters—to aid and motivate households to carry out selection procedures accurately. We empirically examine these elements in two mail surveys of Nebraskans—the 2012 Nebraska Annual Social Indicators Survey and 2013 Nebraska Trees and Forest Survey. We find that neither the calendar nor the explanatory wording adversely affected response rates but that neither improved the representativeness of the completed samples and that the calendar actually reduced selection accuracy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954286302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954286302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1525822X15604825

DO - 10.1177/1525822X15604825

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84954286302

VL - 28

SP - 64

EP - 78

JO - Field Methods

JF - Field Methods

SN - 1525-822X

IS - 1

ER -