Use of telehealth for research and clinical measures in cochlear implant recipients: A validation study

Michelle L. Hughes, Jenny L. Goehring, Jacquelyn L. Baudhuin, Gina R. Diaz, Todd Sanford, Roger Harpster, Daniel L. Valente

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this study was to compare clinical and research-based cochlear implant (CI) measures using telehealth versus traditional methods. Method: This prospective study used an ABA design (A = laboratory, B = remote site). All measures were made twice per visit for the purpose of assessing within-session variability. Twenty-nine adult and pediatric CI recipients participated. Measures included electrode impedance, electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds, psychophysical thresholds using an adaptive procedure, map thresholds and upper comfort levels, and speech perception. Subjects completed a questionnaire at the end of the study. Results: Results for all electrode-specific measures revealed no statistically significant differences between traditional and remote conditions. Speech perception was significantly poorer in the remote condition, which was likely due to the lack of a sound booth. In general, subjects indicated that they would take advantage of telehealth options at least some of the time, if such options were available. Conclusions: Results from this study demonstrate that telehealth is a viable option for research and clinical measures. Additional studies are needed to investigate ways to improve speech perception at remote locations that lack sound booths and to validate the use of telehealth for pediatric services (e.g., play audiometry), sound-field threshold testing, and troubleshooting equipment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1112-1127
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume55
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2012

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implants
Telemedicine
Validation Studies
Speech Perception
recipient
Research
audiometry
Electrodes
lack
Pediatrics
Audiometry
Electric Impedance
Action Potentials
questionnaire
Prospective Studies
Equipment and Supplies
Recipient
Cochlear Implant
Sound

Keywords

  • Cochlear implants
  • Technology
  • Telepractice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Hughes, M. L., Goehring, J. L., Baudhuin, J. L., Diaz, G. R., Sanford, T., Harpster, R., & Valente, D. L. (2012). Use of telehealth for research and clinical measures in cochlear implant recipients: A validation study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(4), 1112-1127. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0237)

Use of telehealth for research and clinical measures in cochlear implant recipients : A validation study. / Hughes, Michelle L.; Goehring, Jenny L.; Baudhuin, Jacquelyn L.; Diaz, Gina R.; Sanford, Todd; Harpster, Roger; Valente, Daniel L.

In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Vol. 55, No. 4, 01.08.2012, p. 1112-1127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hughes, Michelle L. ; Goehring, Jenny L. ; Baudhuin, Jacquelyn L. ; Diaz, Gina R. ; Sanford, Todd ; Harpster, Roger ; Valente, Daniel L. / Use of telehealth for research and clinical measures in cochlear implant recipients : A validation study. In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2012 ; Vol. 55, No. 4. pp. 1112-1127.
@article{1b7a549a98494184bc69cc8833291c0d,
title = "Use of telehealth for research and clinical measures in cochlear implant recipients: A validation study",
abstract = "Purpose: The goal of this study was to compare clinical and research-based cochlear implant (CI) measures using telehealth versus traditional methods. Method: This prospective study used an ABA design (A = laboratory, B = remote site). All measures were made twice per visit for the purpose of assessing within-session variability. Twenty-nine adult and pediatric CI recipients participated. Measures included electrode impedance, electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds, psychophysical thresholds using an adaptive procedure, map thresholds and upper comfort levels, and speech perception. Subjects completed a questionnaire at the end of the study. Results: Results for all electrode-specific measures revealed no statistically significant differences between traditional and remote conditions. Speech perception was significantly poorer in the remote condition, which was likely due to the lack of a sound booth. In general, subjects indicated that they would take advantage of telehealth options at least some of the time, if such options were available. Conclusions: Results from this study demonstrate that telehealth is a viable option for research and clinical measures. Additional studies are needed to investigate ways to improve speech perception at remote locations that lack sound booths and to validate the use of telehealth for pediatric services (e.g., play audiometry), sound-field threshold testing, and troubleshooting equipment.",
keywords = "Cochlear implants, Technology, Telepractice",
author = "Hughes, {Michelle L.} and Goehring, {Jenny L.} and Baudhuin, {Jacquelyn L.} and Diaz, {Gina R.} and Todd Sanford and Roger Harpster and Valente, {Daniel L.}",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0237)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "1112--1127",
journal = "Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research",
issn = "1092-4388",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of telehealth for research and clinical measures in cochlear implant recipients

T2 - A validation study

AU - Hughes, Michelle L.

AU - Goehring, Jenny L.

AU - Baudhuin, Jacquelyn L.

AU - Diaz, Gina R.

AU - Sanford, Todd

AU - Harpster, Roger

AU - Valente, Daniel L.

PY - 2012/8/1

Y1 - 2012/8/1

N2 - Purpose: The goal of this study was to compare clinical and research-based cochlear implant (CI) measures using telehealth versus traditional methods. Method: This prospective study used an ABA design (A = laboratory, B = remote site). All measures were made twice per visit for the purpose of assessing within-session variability. Twenty-nine adult and pediatric CI recipients participated. Measures included electrode impedance, electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds, psychophysical thresholds using an adaptive procedure, map thresholds and upper comfort levels, and speech perception. Subjects completed a questionnaire at the end of the study. Results: Results for all electrode-specific measures revealed no statistically significant differences between traditional and remote conditions. Speech perception was significantly poorer in the remote condition, which was likely due to the lack of a sound booth. In general, subjects indicated that they would take advantage of telehealth options at least some of the time, if such options were available. Conclusions: Results from this study demonstrate that telehealth is a viable option for research and clinical measures. Additional studies are needed to investigate ways to improve speech perception at remote locations that lack sound booths and to validate the use of telehealth for pediatric services (e.g., play audiometry), sound-field threshold testing, and troubleshooting equipment.

AB - Purpose: The goal of this study was to compare clinical and research-based cochlear implant (CI) measures using telehealth versus traditional methods. Method: This prospective study used an ABA design (A = laboratory, B = remote site). All measures were made twice per visit for the purpose of assessing within-session variability. Twenty-nine adult and pediatric CI recipients participated. Measures included electrode impedance, electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds, psychophysical thresholds using an adaptive procedure, map thresholds and upper comfort levels, and speech perception. Subjects completed a questionnaire at the end of the study. Results: Results for all electrode-specific measures revealed no statistically significant differences between traditional and remote conditions. Speech perception was significantly poorer in the remote condition, which was likely due to the lack of a sound booth. In general, subjects indicated that they would take advantage of telehealth options at least some of the time, if such options were available. Conclusions: Results from this study demonstrate that telehealth is a viable option for research and clinical measures. Additional studies are needed to investigate ways to improve speech perception at remote locations that lack sound booths and to validate the use of telehealth for pediatric services (e.g., play audiometry), sound-field threshold testing, and troubleshooting equipment.

KW - Cochlear implants

KW - Technology

KW - Telepractice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866183286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866183286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0237)

DO - 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0237)

M3 - Article

C2 - 22232388

AN - SCOPUS:84866183286

VL - 55

SP - 1112

EP - 1127

JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

SN - 1092-4388

IS - 4

ER -