Use of fiber-reinforced cements in masonry construction and structural rehabilitation

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of fiber reinforcement in traditional concrete mixes has been extensively studied and has been slowly finding its regular use in practice. In contrast, opportunities for the use of fibers in masonry applications and structural rehabilitation projects (masonry and concrete structures) have not been as deeply investigated, where the base matrix may be a weaker cementitious mixture. This paper will summarize the findings of the author's research over the past 10 years in these particular applications of fiber reinforced cements (FRC). For masonry, considering both mortar and mortar-unit bond characteristics, a 0.5% volume fraction of micro fibers in type N Portland cement lime mortar appear to be a viable recipe for most masonry joint applications both for clay and concrete units. In general, clay units perform better with high water content fiber reinforced mortar (FRM) while concrete masonry units (CMUs) perform better with drier mixtures, so 130% and 110% flow rates should be targeted, respectively. For earth block masonry applications, fibers' benefits are observed in improving local damage and water pressure resistance. The FRC retrofit technique proposed for the rehabilitation of reinforced concrete two-way slabs has exceeded expectations in terms of capacity increase for a relatively low cost in comparison to the common but expensive fiber reinforced polymer applications. For all of these applications of fiber-reinforced cements, further research with larger data pools would lead to further optimization of fiber type, size, and amount.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-63
Number of pages23
JournalFibers
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

Fingerprint

Masonry construction
Patient rehabilitation
Cements
Fibers
Mortar
Clay
Concretes
Concrete mixtures
Portland cement
Fiber reinforced materials
Concrete construction
Lime
Water content
Reinforced concrete
Volume fraction
Polymers
Earth (planet)
Flow rate

Keywords

  • Concrete
  • Earthen construction
  • Fibers
  • Masonry
  • Mortar
  • Rehabilitation
  • Retrofit

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ceramics and Composites
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Biomaterials
  • Mechanics of Materials

Cite this

Use of fiber-reinforced cements in masonry construction and structural rehabilitation. / Erdogmus, Ece.

In: Fibers, Vol. 3, No. 1, 01.03.2015, p. 41-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{b64aee716c8b40a3a55e1d5654f98acc,
title = "Use of fiber-reinforced cements in masonry construction and structural rehabilitation",
abstract = "The use of fiber reinforcement in traditional concrete mixes has been extensively studied and has been slowly finding its regular use in practice. In contrast, opportunities for the use of fibers in masonry applications and structural rehabilitation projects (masonry and concrete structures) have not been as deeply investigated, where the base matrix may be a weaker cementitious mixture. This paper will summarize the findings of the author's research over the past 10 years in these particular applications of fiber reinforced cements (FRC). For masonry, considering both mortar and mortar-unit bond characteristics, a 0.5{\%} volume fraction of micro fibers in type N Portland cement lime mortar appear to be a viable recipe for most masonry joint applications both for clay and concrete units. In general, clay units perform better with high water content fiber reinforced mortar (FRM) while concrete masonry units (CMUs) perform better with drier mixtures, so 130{\%} and 110{\%} flow rates should be targeted, respectively. For earth block masonry applications, fibers' benefits are observed in improving local damage and water pressure resistance. The FRC retrofit technique proposed for the rehabilitation of reinforced concrete two-way slabs has exceeded expectations in terms of capacity increase for a relatively low cost in comparison to the common but expensive fiber reinforced polymer applications. For all of these applications of fiber-reinforced cements, further research with larger data pools would lead to further optimization of fiber type, size, and amount.",
keywords = "Concrete, Earthen construction, Fibers, Masonry, Mortar, Rehabilitation, Retrofit",
author = "Ece Erdogmus",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/fib3010041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "41--63",
journal = "Fibers",
issn = "2079-6439",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of fiber-reinforced cements in masonry construction and structural rehabilitation

AU - Erdogmus, Ece

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - The use of fiber reinforcement in traditional concrete mixes has been extensively studied and has been slowly finding its regular use in practice. In contrast, opportunities for the use of fibers in masonry applications and structural rehabilitation projects (masonry and concrete structures) have not been as deeply investigated, where the base matrix may be a weaker cementitious mixture. This paper will summarize the findings of the author's research over the past 10 years in these particular applications of fiber reinforced cements (FRC). For masonry, considering both mortar and mortar-unit bond characteristics, a 0.5% volume fraction of micro fibers in type N Portland cement lime mortar appear to be a viable recipe for most masonry joint applications both for clay and concrete units. In general, clay units perform better with high water content fiber reinforced mortar (FRM) while concrete masonry units (CMUs) perform better with drier mixtures, so 130% and 110% flow rates should be targeted, respectively. For earth block masonry applications, fibers' benefits are observed in improving local damage and water pressure resistance. The FRC retrofit technique proposed for the rehabilitation of reinforced concrete two-way slabs has exceeded expectations in terms of capacity increase for a relatively low cost in comparison to the common but expensive fiber reinforced polymer applications. For all of these applications of fiber-reinforced cements, further research with larger data pools would lead to further optimization of fiber type, size, and amount.

AB - The use of fiber reinforcement in traditional concrete mixes has been extensively studied and has been slowly finding its regular use in practice. In contrast, opportunities for the use of fibers in masonry applications and structural rehabilitation projects (masonry and concrete structures) have not been as deeply investigated, where the base matrix may be a weaker cementitious mixture. This paper will summarize the findings of the author's research over the past 10 years in these particular applications of fiber reinforced cements (FRC). For masonry, considering both mortar and mortar-unit bond characteristics, a 0.5% volume fraction of micro fibers in type N Portland cement lime mortar appear to be a viable recipe for most masonry joint applications both for clay and concrete units. In general, clay units perform better with high water content fiber reinforced mortar (FRM) while concrete masonry units (CMUs) perform better with drier mixtures, so 130% and 110% flow rates should be targeted, respectively. For earth block masonry applications, fibers' benefits are observed in improving local damage and water pressure resistance. The FRC retrofit technique proposed for the rehabilitation of reinforced concrete two-way slabs has exceeded expectations in terms of capacity increase for a relatively low cost in comparison to the common but expensive fiber reinforced polymer applications. For all of these applications of fiber-reinforced cements, further research with larger data pools would lead to further optimization of fiber type, size, and amount.

KW - Concrete

KW - Earthen construction

KW - Fibers

KW - Masonry

KW - Mortar

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Retrofit

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84950254971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84950254971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/fib3010041

DO - 10.3390/fib3010041

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84950254971

VL - 3

SP - 41

EP - 63

JO - Fibers

JF - Fibers

SN - 2079-6439

IS - 1

ER -