US State Public Health Departments Special Pathogen Planning

Jocelyn J. Herstein, Paul D. Biddinger, Shawn G. Gibbs, Aurora B. Le, Katelyn C. Jelden, Angela L Hewlett, John-Martin J Lowe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: US state public health departments played key roles in planning for and responding to confirmed and suspected cases of Ebola virus disease (EVD) during the 2014-2016 outbreak, including designating select hospitals as high-level isolation units (HLIUs) for EVD treatment in conjunction with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Objective: To identify existing guidelines and perspectives of state health departments pertaining to the management and transport of patients with EVD and other highly hazardous communicable diseases (HHCDs). Design: An electronic 8-question survey with subquestions was administered as a fillable PDF. Setting: The survey was distributed to publicly accessible e-mails of state health department employees. Participants: State epidemiologists, emergency preparedness directors, or chief medical officers from each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia were contacted; a representative from 36 states and the District of Columbia responded (73%). Main Outcome Measures: Descriptive statistics were used to identify the proportion of state health departments with various existing protocols. Results: A majority of states reported that they would prefer patients confirmed with viral hemorrhagic fevers (eg, EVD, Marburg fever) and smallpox be transported to an HLIU for treatment rather than remain at the initial hospital of diagnosis. While most (89%) states had written guidelines for the safe transportation of patients with HHCDs, only 6 (16%) had written protocols for the management of accidents or other travel disruptions that may occur during HHCD transport within the state. Twenty-two state health departments (59%) had operationally exercised transport of a patient to an HLIU. Conclusions: Nearly half of states in the United States lack an HLIU, yet most prefer to have patients with HHCDs treated in high-level isolation. Recent budget cuts and uncertainty of future funding threaten the abilities of health departments to devote the necessary resources and staff to prepare for and deliver the desired care to HHCD cases. The lack of HLIUs in some states may complicate transport to a geographically proximate HLIU. Moreover, limited guidance on diseases that warrant high-level isolation may cause disagreement in HHCD patient placement between health departments, diagnosing facilities, and HLIUs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E28-E33
JournalJournal of Public Health Management and Practice
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Ebola Hemorrhagic Fever
Communicable Diseases
Public Health
Health
Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers
Transportation of Patients
Guidelines
Civil Defense
Smallpox
Postal Service
Budgets
Occupational Health
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Uncertainty
Accidents
Disease Outbreaks
Fever
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Ebola virus
  • emerging
  • infectious diseases
  • patient isolation
  • transportation of patients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

US State Public Health Departments Special Pathogen Planning. / Herstein, Jocelyn J.; Biddinger, Paul D.; Gibbs, Shawn G.; Le, Aurora B.; Jelden, Katelyn C.; Hewlett, Angela L; Lowe, John-Martin J.

In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, Vol. 24, No. 5, 01.09.2018, p. E28-E33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Herstein, Jocelyn J. ; Biddinger, Paul D. ; Gibbs, Shawn G. ; Le, Aurora B. ; Jelden, Katelyn C. ; Hewlett, Angela L ; Lowe, John-Martin J. / US State Public Health Departments Special Pathogen Planning. In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2018 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. E28-E33.
@article{3d42d24b1b1a4908b653f00502ec5670,
title = "US State Public Health Departments Special Pathogen Planning",
abstract = "Context: US state public health departments played key roles in planning for and responding to confirmed and suspected cases of Ebola virus disease (EVD) during the 2014-2016 outbreak, including designating select hospitals as high-level isolation units (HLIUs) for EVD treatment in conjunction with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Objective: To identify existing guidelines and perspectives of state health departments pertaining to the management and transport of patients with EVD and other highly hazardous communicable diseases (HHCDs). Design: An electronic 8-question survey with subquestions was administered as a fillable PDF. Setting: The survey was distributed to publicly accessible e-mails of state health department employees. Participants: State epidemiologists, emergency preparedness directors, or chief medical officers from each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia were contacted; a representative from 36 states and the District of Columbia responded (73{\%}). Main Outcome Measures: Descriptive statistics were used to identify the proportion of state health departments with various existing protocols. Results: A majority of states reported that they would prefer patients confirmed with viral hemorrhagic fevers (eg, EVD, Marburg fever) and smallpox be transported to an HLIU for treatment rather than remain at the initial hospital of diagnosis. While most (89{\%}) states had written guidelines for the safe transportation of patients with HHCDs, only 6 (16{\%}) had written protocols for the management of accidents or other travel disruptions that may occur during HHCD transport within the state. Twenty-two state health departments (59{\%}) had operationally exercised transport of a patient to an HLIU. Conclusions: Nearly half of states in the United States lack an HLIU, yet most prefer to have patients with HHCDs treated in high-level isolation. Recent budget cuts and uncertainty of future funding threaten the abilities of health departments to devote the necessary resources and staff to prepare for and deliver the desired care to HHCD cases. The lack of HLIUs in some states may complicate transport to a geographically proximate HLIU. Moreover, limited guidance on diseases that warrant high-level isolation may cause disagreement in HHCD patient placement between health departments, diagnosing facilities, and HLIUs.",
keywords = "Ebola virus, emerging, infectious diseases, patient isolation, transportation of patients",
author = "Herstein, {Jocelyn J.} and Biddinger, {Paul D.} and Gibbs, {Shawn G.} and Le, {Aurora B.} and Jelden, {Katelyn C.} and Hewlett, {Angela L} and Lowe, {John-Martin J}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PHH.0000000000000714",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "E28--E33",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Management and Practice",
issn = "1078-4659",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - US State Public Health Departments Special Pathogen Planning

AU - Herstein, Jocelyn J.

AU - Biddinger, Paul D.

AU - Gibbs, Shawn G.

AU - Le, Aurora B.

AU - Jelden, Katelyn C.

AU - Hewlett, Angela L

AU - Lowe, John-Martin J

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Context: US state public health departments played key roles in planning for and responding to confirmed and suspected cases of Ebola virus disease (EVD) during the 2014-2016 outbreak, including designating select hospitals as high-level isolation units (HLIUs) for EVD treatment in conjunction with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Objective: To identify existing guidelines and perspectives of state health departments pertaining to the management and transport of patients with EVD and other highly hazardous communicable diseases (HHCDs). Design: An electronic 8-question survey with subquestions was administered as a fillable PDF. Setting: The survey was distributed to publicly accessible e-mails of state health department employees. Participants: State epidemiologists, emergency preparedness directors, or chief medical officers from each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia were contacted; a representative from 36 states and the District of Columbia responded (73%). Main Outcome Measures: Descriptive statistics were used to identify the proportion of state health departments with various existing protocols. Results: A majority of states reported that they would prefer patients confirmed with viral hemorrhagic fevers (eg, EVD, Marburg fever) and smallpox be transported to an HLIU for treatment rather than remain at the initial hospital of diagnosis. While most (89%) states had written guidelines for the safe transportation of patients with HHCDs, only 6 (16%) had written protocols for the management of accidents or other travel disruptions that may occur during HHCD transport within the state. Twenty-two state health departments (59%) had operationally exercised transport of a patient to an HLIU. Conclusions: Nearly half of states in the United States lack an HLIU, yet most prefer to have patients with HHCDs treated in high-level isolation. Recent budget cuts and uncertainty of future funding threaten the abilities of health departments to devote the necessary resources and staff to prepare for and deliver the desired care to HHCD cases. The lack of HLIUs in some states may complicate transport to a geographically proximate HLIU. Moreover, limited guidance on diseases that warrant high-level isolation may cause disagreement in HHCD patient placement between health departments, diagnosing facilities, and HLIUs.

AB - Context: US state public health departments played key roles in planning for and responding to confirmed and suspected cases of Ebola virus disease (EVD) during the 2014-2016 outbreak, including designating select hospitals as high-level isolation units (HLIUs) for EVD treatment in conjunction with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Objective: To identify existing guidelines and perspectives of state health departments pertaining to the management and transport of patients with EVD and other highly hazardous communicable diseases (HHCDs). Design: An electronic 8-question survey with subquestions was administered as a fillable PDF. Setting: The survey was distributed to publicly accessible e-mails of state health department employees. Participants: State epidemiologists, emergency preparedness directors, or chief medical officers from each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia were contacted; a representative from 36 states and the District of Columbia responded (73%). Main Outcome Measures: Descriptive statistics were used to identify the proportion of state health departments with various existing protocols. Results: A majority of states reported that they would prefer patients confirmed with viral hemorrhagic fevers (eg, EVD, Marburg fever) and smallpox be transported to an HLIU for treatment rather than remain at the initial hospital of diagnosis. While most (89%) states had written guidelines for the safe transportation of patients with HHCDs, only 6 (16%) had written protocols for the management of accidents or other travel disruptions that may occur during HHCD transport within the state. Twenty-two state health departments (59%) had operationally exercised transport of a patient to an HLIU. Conclusions: Nearly half of states in the United States lack an HLIU, yet most prefer to have patients with HHCDs treated in high-level isolation. Recent budget cuts and uncertainty of future funding threaten the abilities of health departments to devote the necessary resources and staff to prepare for and deliver the desired care to HHCD cases. The lack of HLIUs in some states may complicate transport to a geographically proximate HLIU. Moreover, limited guidance on diseases that warrant high-level isolation may cause disagreement in HHCD patient placement between health departments, diagnosing facilities, and HLIUs.

KW - Ebola virus

KW - emerging

KW - infectious diseases

KW - patient isolation

KW - transportation of patients

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037978133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037978133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000714

DO - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000714

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - E28-E33

JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

SN - 1078-4659

IS - 5

ER -