U.S. Physicians' Opinions about Accommodating Religiously Based Requests for Continued Life-Sustaining Treatment

Derek D. Ayeh, Hyo Jung Tak, John D. Yoon, Farr A. Curlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context Families of critically ill patients occasionally request that physicians continue life-sustaining treatment (LST), sometimes giving religious reasons. Objectives To examine whether U.S. physicians are more likely to accommodate requests for LST that are based on religious reasons. Methods In 2010, we surveyed 1156 practicing U.S. physicians from specialties likely to care for adult patients with advanced illness. The questionnaire included two randomized experimental vignettes: one where a family asked that LST be continued for a patient that met brain death criteria and a second where the son of an elderly patient with cancer insists on continuing LST. In both, we experimentally varied the reasons that the family member gave to justify the request, to see if physicians are more likely to accommodate a request based on a religious requirement or hope for a miracle, compared to no mention of either. For physicians' religious characteristics, we assessed their religious affiliation and level of religiosity. Results For the patient meeting brain death criteria, physicians were more likely to accommodate the request to continue LST when the family mentioned their Orthodox Jewish community (85% vs. 70%, P < 0.001). For the patient with metastatic cancer, physicians were more likely to accommodate the request when the son said his religious faith does not permit discontinuing LST (65% vs. 46%, P < 0.001), but not when he said he expected divine healing (50% vs. 46%). Conclusion Physicians appear more willing to accommodate requests to continue LST when those requests are based on particular religious communities or traditions, but not when based on expectations of divine healing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)971-978
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume51
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Physicians
Brain Death
Therapeutics
Nuclear Family
Hope
Critical Illness
Neoplasms
Patient Care

Keywords

  • Key Words Life-sustaining treatment
  • clinical ethics
  • end-of-life decision making
  • national survey
  • religion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

U.S. Physicians' Opinions about Accommodating Religiously Based Requests for Continued Life-Sustaining Treatment. / Ayeh, Derek D.; Tak, Hyo Jung; Yoon, John D.; Curlin, Farr A.

In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 51, No. 6, 01.06.2016, p. 971-978.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{41cefeda8dbc4ea68fd6dbdbb3989536,
title = "U.S. Physicians' Opinions about Accommodating Religiously Based Requests for Continued Life-Sustaining Treatment",
abstract = "Context Families of critically ill patients occasionally request that physicians continue life-sustaining treatment (LST), sometimes giving religious reasons. Objectives To examine whether U.S. physicians are more likely to accommodate requests for LST that are based on religious reasons. Methods In 2010, we surveyed 1156 practicing U.S. physicians from specialties likely to care for adult patients with advanced illness. The questionnaire included two randomized experimental vignettes: one where a family asked that LST be continued for a patient that met brain death criteria and a second where the son of an elderly patient with cancer insists on continuing LST. In both, we experimentally varied the reasons that the family member gave to justify the request, to see if physicians are more likely to accommodate a request based on a religious requirement or hope for a miracle, compared to no mention of either. For physicians' religious characteristics, we assessed their religious affiliation and level of religiosity. Results For the patient meeting brain death criteria, physicians were more likely to accommodate the request to continue LST when the family mentioned their Orthodox Jewish community (85{\%} vs. 70{\%}, P < 0.001). For the patient with metastatic cancer, physicians were more likely to accommodate the request when the son said his religious faith does not permit discontinuing LST (65{\%} vs. 46{\%}, P < 0.001), but not when he said he expected divine healing (50{\%} vs. 46{\%}). Conclusion Physicians appear more willing to accommodate requests to continue LST when those requests are based on particular religious communities or traditions, but not when based on expectations of divine healing.",
keywords = "Key Words Life-sustaining treatment, clinical ethics, end-of-life decision making, national survey, religion",
author = "Ayeh, {Derek D.} and Tak, {Hyo Jung} and Yoon, {John D.} and Curlin, {Farr A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.337",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "971--978",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - U.S. Physicians' Opinions about Accommodating Religiously Based Requests for Continued Life-Sustaining Treatment

AU - Ayeh, Derek D.

AU - Tak, Hyo Jung

AU - Yoon, John D.

AU - Curlin, Farr A.

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Context Families of critically ill patients occasionally request that physicians continue life-sustaining treatment (LST), sometimes giving religious reasons. Objectives To examine whether U.S. physicians are more likely to accommodate requests for LST that are based on religious reasons. Methods In 2010, we surveyed 1156 practicing U.S. physicians from specialties likely to care for adult patients with advanced illness. The questionnaire included two randomized experimental vignettes: one where a family asked that LST be continued for a patient that met brain death criteria and a second where the son of an elderly patient with cancer insists on continuing LST. In both, we experimentally varied the reasons that the family member gave to justify the request, to see if physicians are more likely to accommodate a request based on a religious requirement or hope for a miracle, compared to no mention of either. For physicians' religious characteristics, we assessed their religious affiliation and level of religiosity. Results For the patient meeting brain death criteria, physicians were more likely to accommodate the request to continue LST when the family mentioned their Orthodox Jewish community (85% vs. 70%, P < 0.001). For the patient with metastatic cancer, physicians were more likely to accommodate the request when the son said his religious faith does not permit discontinuing LST (65% vs. 46%, P < 0.001), but not when he said he expected divine healing (50% vs. 46%). Conclusion Physicians appear more willing to accommodate requests to continue LST when those requests are based on particular religious communities or traditions, but not when based on expectations of divine healing.

AB - Context Families of critically ill patients occasionally request that physicians continue life-sustaining treatment (LST), sometimes giving religious reasons. Objectives To examine whether U.S. physicians are more likely to accommodate requests for LST that are based on religious reasons. Methods In 2010, we surveyed 1156 practicing U.S. physicians from specialties likely to care for adult patients with advanced illness. The questionnaire included two randomized experimental vignettes: one where a family asked that LST be continued for a patient that met brain death criteria and a second where the son of an elderly patient with cancer insists on continuing LST. In both, we experimentally varied the reasons that the family member gave to justify the request, to see if physicians are more likely to accommodate a request based on a religious requirement or hope for a miracle, compared to no mention of either. For physicians' religious characteristics, we assessed their religious affiliation and level of religiosity. Results For the patient meeting brain death criteria, physicians were more likely to accommodate the request to continue LST when the family mentioned their Orthodox Jewish community (85% vs. 70%, P < 0.001). For the patient with metastatic cancer, physicians were more likely to accommodate the request when the son said his religious faith does not permit discontinuing LST (65% vs. 46%, P < 0.001), but not when he said he expected divine healing (50% vs. 46%). Conclusion Physicians appear more willing to accommodate requests to continue LST when those requests are based on particular religious communities or traditions, but not when based on expectations of divine healing.

KW - Key Words Life-sustaining treatment

KW - clinical ethics

KW - end-of-life decision making

KW - national survey

KW - religion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973100674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973100674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.337

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.337

M3 - Article

C2 - 27039013

AN - SCOPUS:84973100674

VL - 51

SP - 971

EP - 978

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

IS - 6

ER -