US Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) practitioners' recommendations regarding condomless sex in the era of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and treatment as prevention

Travis Schreier, Renslow Sherer, Harlan Sayles, Donna M. Jacobsen, Susan Swindells, Sara H. Bares

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background. We sought to characterize human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) practitioners' recommendations to patients regarding treatment as prevention, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and condom use among persons with HIV (PWH) with viral suppression and individuals receiving PrEP. Methods. A brief survey about counseling practices was distributed electronically to previous attendees of an International Antiviral Society-USA continuing medical education activity. Descriptive analyses were performed for all questions. Pearson χ2 tests were used to identify potential differences in counseling practices based on sex, degree/license, years in practice, number of PWH cared for in the past year, and practice location. Results. Of the 3238 persons surveyed, 478 (15%) responded. 65% were female, 47% were physicians, 78% had been in practice ≥6 years, and 52% had cared for >100 PWH in the last year. Of the respondents, 51% (95% confidence interval, 46.8%-56.0%) agreed that the evidence "supports, strongly supports or proves" that condomless sex with a PWH with viral suppression does not lead to HIV transmission, and 76% (72.2%-80.0%) commonly or always recommend condoms for such patients. Although 42% (95% confidence interval, 37.0%-46.0%) of respondents said the evidence "supports, strongly supports or proves" that condomless sex involving a person at risk for HIV infection receiving PrEP does not lead to HIV transmission, 81% (77.3%-84.5%) commonly or always recommend condom use for such patients. Responses differed significantly by practitioner experience, region, sex and degree. Conclusions. Although many practitioners caring for individuals with and at risk for HIV infection acknowledge that successful treatment or PrEP prevents transmission, the majority of practitioners commonly or always recommend condom use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalOpen Forum Infectious Diseases
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2019

Fingerprint

HIV
Condoms
Therapeutics
Virus Diseases
Counseling
Confidence Intervals
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis
Continuing Medical Education
Licensure
Antiviral Agents
Physicians
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Condom use
  • HIV prevention
  • Pre-exposure prophylaxis
  • Survey
  • Treatment as prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

US Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) practitioners' recommendations regarding condomless sex in the era of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and treatment as prevention. / Schreier, Travis; Sherer, Renslow; Sayles, Harlan; Jacobsen, Donna M.; Swindells, Susan; Bares, Sara H.

In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Vol. 6, No. 3, 03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{71ea73f7d1ad43928abaf305f0410561,
title = "US Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) practitioners' recommendations regarding condomless sex in the era of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and treatment as prevention",
abstract = "Background. We sought to characterize human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) practitioners' recommendations to patients regarding treatment as prevention, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and condom use among persons with HIV (PWH) with viral suppression and individuals receiving PrEP. Methods. A brief survey about counseling practices was distributed electronically to previous attendees of an International Antiviral Society-USA continuing medical education activity. Descriptive analyses were performed for all questions. Pearson χ2 tests were used to identify potential differences in counseling practices based on sex, degree/license, years in practice, number of PWH cared for in the past year, and practice location. Results. Of the 3238 persons surveyed, 478 (15{\%}) responded. 65{\%} were female, 47{\%} were physicians, 78{\%} had been in practice ≥6 years, and 52{\%} had cared for >100 PWH in the last year. Of the respondents, 51{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval, 46.8{\%}-56.0{\%}) agreed that the evidence {"}supports, strongly supports or proves{"} that condomless sex with a PWH with viral suppression does not lead to HIV transmission, and 76{\%} (72.2{\%}-80.0{\%}) commonly or always recommend condoms for such patients. Although 42{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval, 37.0{\%}-46.0{\%}) of respondents said the evidence {"}supports, strongly supports or proves{"} that condomless sex involving a person at risk for HIV infection receiving PrEP does not lead to HIV transmission, 81{\%} (77.3{\%}-84.5{\%}) commonly or always recommend condom use for such patients. Responses differed significantly by practitioner experience, region, sex and degree. Conclusions. Although many practitioners caring for individuals with and at risk for HIV infection acknowledge that successful treatment or PrEP prevents transmission, the majority of practitioners commonly or always recommend condom use.",
keywords = "Condom use, HIV prevention, Pre-exposure prophylaxis, Survey, Treatment as prevention",
author = "Travis Schreier and Renslow Sherer and Harlan Sayles and Jacobsen, {Donna M.} and Susan Swindells and Bares, {Sara H.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1093/ofid/ofz082",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "Open Forum Infectious Diseases",
issn = "2328-8957",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - US Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) practitioners' recommendations regarding condomless sex in the era of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and treatment as prevention

AU - Schreier, Travis

AU - Sherer, Renslow

AU - Sayles, Harlan

AU - Jacobsen, Donna M.

AU - Swindells, Susan

AU - Bares, Sara H.

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - Background. We sought to characterize human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) practitioners' recommendations to patients regarding treatment as prevention, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and condom use among persons with HIV (PWH) with viral suppression and individuals receiving PrEP. Methods. A brief survey about counseling practices was distributed electronically to previous attendees of an International Antiviral Society-USA continuing medical education activity. Descriptive analyses were performed for all questions. Pearson χ2 tests were used to identify potential differences in counseling practices based on sex, degree/license, years in practice, number of PWH cared for in the past year, and practice location. Results. Of the 3238 persons surveyed, 478 (15%) responded. 65% were female, 47% were physicians, 78% had been in practice ≥6 years, and 52% had cared for >100 PWH in the last year. Of the respondents, 51% (95% confidence interval, 46.8%-56.0%) agreed that the evidence "supports, strongly supports or proves" that condomless sex with a PWH with viral suppression does not lead to HIV transmission, and 76% (72.2%-80.0%) commonly or always recommend condoms for such patients. Although 42% (95% confidence interval, 37.0%-46.0%) of respondents said the evidence "supports, strongly supports or proves" that condomless sex involving a person at risk for HIV infection receiving PrEP does not lead to HIV transmission, 81% (77.3%-84.5%) commonly or always recommend condom use for such patients. Responses differed significantly by practitioner experience, region, sex and degree. Conclusions. Although many practitioners caring for individuals with and at risk for HIV infection acknowledge that successful treatment or PrEP prevents transmission, the majority of practitioners commonly or always recommend condom use.

AB - Background. We sought to characterize human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) practitioners' recommendations to patients regarding treatment as prevention, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and condom use among persons with HIV (PWH) with viral suppression and individuals receiving PrEP. Methods. A brief survey about counseling practices was distributed electronically to previous attendees of an International Antiviral Society-USA continuing medical education activity. Descriptive analyses were performed for all questions. Pearson χ2 tests were used to identify potential differences in counseling practices based on sex, degree/license, years in practice, number of PWH cared for in the past year, and practice location. Results. Of the 3238 persons surveyed, 478 (15%) responded. 65% were female, 47% were physicians, 78% had been in practice ≥6 years, and 52% had cared for >100 PWH in the last year. Of the respondents, 51% (95% confidence interval, 46.8%-56.0%) agreed that the evidence "supports, strongly supports or proves" that condomless sex with a PWH with viral suppression does not lead to HIV transmission, and 76% (72.2%-80.0%) commonly or always recommend condoms for such patients. Although 42% (95% confidence interval, 37.0%-46.0%) of respondents said the evidence "supports, strongly supports or proves" that condomless sex involving a person at risk for HIV infection receiving PrEP does not lead to HIV transmission, 81% (77.3%-84.5%) commonly or always recommend condom use for such patients. Responses differed significantly by practitioner experience, region, sex and degree. Conclusions. Although many practitioners caring for individuals with and at risk for HIV infection acknowledge that successful treatment or PrEP prevents transmission, the majority of practitioners commonly or always recommend condom use.

KW - Condom use

KW - HIV prevention

KW - Pre-exposure prophylaxis

KW - Survey

KW - Treatment as prevention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066413072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066413072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ofid/ofz082

DO - 10.1093/ofid/ofz082

M3 - Article

C2 - 30895208

AN - SCOPUS:85066413072

VL - 6

JO - Open Forum Infectious Diseases

JF - Open Forum Infectious Diseases

SN - 2328-8957

IS - 3

ER -