Unstable proximal femur fractures treated with proximal femoral locking plates: A retrospective, multicenter study of 111 cases

Cory A. Collinge, Robert Hymes, Michael Archdeacon, Philipp N Streubel, William Obremskey, Timothy Weber, J. Tracy Watson, David Lowenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: A few small case series have found that proximal femur fractures treated with a proximal femur locking plate (PFLP) have experienced more failures than expected. The purpose of this study was to review the clinical results of patients with acute, unstable proximal femur fractures treated with proximal femoral locking plates in a large, multicenter patient cohort. Design: This is a retrospective clinical study. Setting: The study included patients from 12 regional trauma centers and tertiary referral hospitals. Patients: One hundred eleven consecutive patients with unstable proximal femur fractures stabilized with a PFLP and having required clinical and radiographic follow-up at a minimum of 12 months after injury. Intervention: Surgical repair of an unstable proximal femur fracture with a PFLP. Main outcome measurements: Treatment failures (failure of fixation, nonunion, and malunion) and need for revision surgery. Results: Forty-six patients (41.4%) experienced a major treatment failure, including failed fixation with or without nonunion (39), surgical malalignment or malunion (18), deep infection (8), or a combination of these. Thirty-eight (34%) patients underwent secondary surgeries, including 30 for failed fixation, nonunion, or both. Treatment failure was found to occur at a significantly higher rate in patients with major comorbidities, in femurs repaired in varus malalignment, and using specific plate designs. Conclusions: Proximal femoral locking plates are associated with a high complication rate, frequently requiring revision or secondary surgeries in the treatment of unstable proximal femur fractures. Given the high complication rate with PFLPs, careful attention to reduction, use of a PFLP implant, and consideration should be given to alternative implants or fixation techniques when appropriate. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)489-495
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Volume30
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Thigh
Femur
Multicenter Studies
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Failure
Trauma Centers
Reoperation
Tertiary Care Centers
Comorbidity
Wounds and Injuries
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • PFLP
  • fail
  • failure
  • femur
  • fracture
  • intertrochanteric fracture
  • locked
  • locked plate
  • locking
  • locking plate
  • peritrochanteric fracture
  • plate
  • prox fem
  • proximal
  • proximal femur
  • unstable

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Unstable proximal femur fractures treated with proximal femoral locking plates : A retrospective, multicenter study of 111 cases. / Collinge, Cory A.; Hymes, Robert; Archdeacon, Michael; Streubel, Philipp N; Obremskey, William; Weber, Timothy; Watson, J. Tracy; Lowenberg, David.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 30, No. 9, 01.09.2016, p. 489-495.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Collinge, Cory A. ; Hymes, Robert ; Archdeacon, Michael ; Streubel, Philipp N ; Obremskey, William ; Weber, Timothy ; Watson, J. Tracy ; Lowenberg, David. / Unstable proximal femur fractures treated with proximal femoral locking plates : A retrospective, multicenter study of 111 cases. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2016 ; Vol. 30, No. 9. pp. 489-495.
@article{d834df0021fc4a568ff8700fe83384fa,
title = "Unstable proximal femur fractures treated with proximal femoral locking plates: A retrospective, multicenter study of 111 cases",
abstract = "Objectives: A few small case series have found that proximal femur fractures treated with a proximal femur locking plate (PFLP) have experienced more failures than expected. The purpose of this study was to review the clinical results of patients with acute, unstable proximal femur fractures treated with proximal femoral locking plates in a large, multicenter patient cohort. Design: This is a retrospective clinical study. Setting: The study included patients from 12 regional trauma centers and tertiary referral hospitals. Patients: One hundred eleven consecutive patients with unstable proximal femur fractures stabilized with a PFLP and having required clinical and radiographic follow-up at a minimum of 12 months after injury. Intervention: Surgical repair of an unstable proximal femur fracture with a PFLP. Main outcome measurements: Treatment failures (failure of fixation, nonunion, and malunion) and need for revision surgery. Results: Forty-six patients (41.4{\%}) experienced a major treatment failure, including failed fixation with or without nonunion (39), surgical malalignment or malunion (18), deep infection (8), or a combination of these. Thirty-eight (34{\%}) patients underwent secondary surgeries, including 30 for failed fixation, nonunion, or both. Treatment failure was found to occur at a significantly higher rate in patients with major comorbidities, in femurs repaired in varus malalignment, and using specific plate designs. Conclusions: Proximal femoral locking plates are associated with a high complication rate, frequently requiring revision or secondary surgeries in the treatment of unstable proximal femur fractures. Given the high complication rate with PFLPs, careful attention to reduction, use of a PFLP implant, and consideration should be given to alternative implants or fixation techniques when appropriate. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.",
keywords = "PFLP, fail, failure, femur, fracture, intertrochanteric fracture, locked, locked plate, locking, locking plate, peritrochanteric fracture, plate, prox fem, proximal, proximal femur, unstable",
author = "Collinge, {Cory A.} and Robert Hymes and Michael Archdeacon and Streubel, {Philipp N} and William Obremskey and Timothy Weber and Watson, {J. Tracy} and David Lowenberg",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BOT.0000000000000602",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "489--495",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma",
issn = "0890-5339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unstable proximal femur fractures treated with proximal femoral locking plates

T2 - A retrospective, multicenter study of 111 cases

AU - Collinge, Cory A.

AU - Hymes, Robert

AU - Archdeacon, Michael

AU - Streubel, Philipp N

AU - Obremskey, William

AU - Weber, Timothy

AU - Watson, J. Tracy

AU - Lowenberg, David

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Objectives: A few small case series have found that proximal femur fractures treated with a proximal femur locking plate (PFLP) have experienced more failures than expected. The purpose of this study was to review the clinical results of patients with acute, unstable proximal femur fractures treated with proximal femoral locking plates in a large, multicenter patient cohort. Design: This is a retrospective clinical study. Setting: The study included patients from 12 regional trauma centers and tertiary referral hospitals. Patients: One hundred eleven consecutive patients with unstable proximal femur fractures stabilized with a PFLP and having required clinical and radiographic follow-up at a minimum of 12 months after injury. Intervention: Surgical repair of an unstable proximal femur fracture with a PFLP. Main outcome measurements: Treatment failures (failure of fixation, nonunion, and malunion) and need for revision surgery. Results: Forty-six patients (41.4%) experienced a major treatment failure, including failed fixation with or without nonunion (39), surgical malalignment or malunion (18), deep infection (8), or a combination of these. Thirty-eight (34%) patients underwent secondary surgeries, including 30 for failed fixation, nonunion, or both. Treatment failure was found to occur at a significantly higher rate in patients with major comorbidities, in femurs repaired in varus malalignment, and using specific plate designs. Conclusions: Proximal femoral locking plates are associated with a high complication rate, frequently requiring revision or secondary surgeries in the treatment of unstable proximal femur fractures. Given the high complication rate with PFLPs, careful attention to reduction, use of a PFLP implant, and consideration should be given to alternative implants or fixation techniques when appropriate. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

AB - Objectives: A few small case series have found that proximal femur fractures treated with a proximal femur locking plate (PFLP) have experienced more failures than expected. The purpose of this study was to review the clinical results of patients with acute, unstable proximal femur fractures treated with proximal femoral locking plates in a large, multicenter patient cohort. Design: This is a retrospective clinical study. Setting: The study included patients from 12 regional trauma centers and tertiary referral hospitals. Patients: One hundred eleven consecutive patients with unstable proximal femur fractures stabilized with a PFLP and having required clinical and radiographic follow-up at a minimum of 12 months after injury. Intervention: Surgical repair of an unstable proximal femur fracture with a PFLP. Main outcome measurements: Treatment failures (failure of fixation, nonunion, and malunion) and need for revision surgery. Results: Forty-six patients (41.4%) experienced a major treatment failure, including failed fixation with or without nonunion (39), surgical malalignment or malunion (18), deep infection (8), or a combination of these. Thirty-eight (34%) patients underwent secondary surgeries, including 30 for failed fixation, nonunion, or both. Treatment failure was found to occur at a significantly higher rate in patients with major comorbidities, in femurs repaired in varus malalignment, and using specific plate designs. Conclusions: Proximal femoral locking plates are associated with a high complication rate, frequently requiring revision or secondary surgeries in the treatment of unstable proximal femur fractures. Given the high complication rate with PFLPs, careful attention to reduction, use of a PFLP implant, and consideration should be given to alternative implants or fixation techniques when appropriate. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

KW - PFLP

KW - fail

KW - failure

KW - femur

KW - fracture

KW - intertrochanteric fracture

KW - locked

KW - locked plate

KW - locking

KW - locking plate

KW - peritrochanteric fracture

KW - plate

KW - prox fem

KW - proximal

KW - proximal femur

KW - unstable

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965072220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965072220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000602

DO - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000602

M3 - Article

C2 - 27144821

AN - SCOPUS:84965072220

VL - 30

SP - 489

EP - 495

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

SN - 0890-5339

IS - 9

ER -