Unsafe rear-end collision avoidance in Alzheimer's disease

Ergun Y. Uc, Matthew Rizzo, Steven W. Anderson, Qian Shi, Jeffrey D. Dawson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drivers with cognitive impairment are at increased odds for vehicular crashes. Rear-end collisions (REC) are among the most common crash types. We tested REC avoidance in 61 drivers with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 115 elderly controls using a high-fidelity interactive driving simulator. After a segment of uneventful driving, each driver suddenly encountered a lead vehicle stopped at an intersection, creating the potential for a collision with lead vehicle or with another vehicle following closely behind the driver. Eighty-nine percent of drivers with AD had unsafe outcomes, either an REC or an risky avoidance behavior (defined as slowing down abruptly or prematurely, or swerving out of the traffic lane) compared to 65% of controls (P = 0.0007). Crash rates were similar in AD (5%) and controls (3%), yet a greater proportion of drivers with AD slowed down abruptly (70% vs. 37%, P < 0.0001) or prematurely (66% vs. 45%, P = 0.0115). Abrupt slowing increased the odds of being struck from behind by the following vehicle (P = 0.0262). Unsafe outcomes were predicted by tests of visual perception, attention, memory, visuospatial/constructional abilities, and executive functions, as well as vehicular control measures during an uneventful driving segment. Drivers with AD had difficulty responding to driving conditions that pose a hazard for a REC. Some cognitive and visual tests were predictive of unsafe outcomes even after adjusting for disease status.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-43
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the neurological sciences
Volume251
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 21 2006

Fingerprint

Alzheimer Disease
Avoidance Learning
Visual Perception
Aptitude
Executive Function
Lead

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Cognition
  • Crash
  • Dementia
  • Driving
  • Traffic accident
  • Vision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Unsafe rear-end collision avoidance in Alzheimer's disease. / Uc, Ergun Y.; Rizzo, Matthew; Anderson, Steven W.; Shi, Qian; Dawson, Jeffrey D.

In: Journal of the neurological sciences, Vol. 251, No. 1-2, 21.12.2006, p. 35-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Uc, Ergun Y. ; Rizzo, Matthew ; Anderson, Steven W. ; Shi, Qian ; Dawson, Jeffrey D. / Unsafe rear-end collision avoidance in Alzheimer's disease. In: Journal of the neurological sciences. 2006 ; Vol. 251, No. 1-2. pp. 35-43.
@article{a137380ccb3e4e3a991f1d2c49c42c7b,
title = "Unsafe rear-end collision avoidance in Alzheimer's disease",
abstract = "Drivers with cognitive impairment are at increased odds for vehicular crashes. Rear-end collisions (REC) are among the most common crash types. We tested REC avoidance in 61 drivers with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 115 elderly controls using a high-fidelity interactive driving simulator. After a segment of uneventful driving, each driver suddenly encountered a lead vehicle stopped at an intersection, creating the potential for a collision with lead vehicle or with another vehicle following closely behind the driver. Eighty-nine percent of drivers with AD had unsafe outcomes, either an REC or an risky avoidance behavior (defined as slowing down abruptly or prematurely, or swerving out of the traffic lane) compared to 65{\%} of controls (P = 0.0007). Crash rates were similar in AD (5{\%}) and controls (3{\%}), yet a greater proportion of drivers with AD slowed down abruptly (70{\%} vs. 37{\%}, P < 0.0001) or prematurely (66{\%} vs. 45{\%}, P = 0.0115). Abrupt slowing increased the odds of being struck from behind by the following vehicle (P = 0.0262). Unsafe outcomes were predicted by tests of visual perception, attention, memory, visuospatial/constructional abilities, and executive functions, as well as vehicular control measures during an uneventful driving segment. Drivers with AD had difficulty responding to driving conditions that pose a hazard for a REC. Some cognitive and visual tests were predictive of unsafe outcomes even after adjusting for disease status.",
keywords = "Alzheimer's disease, Cognition, Crash, Dementia, Driving, Traffic accident, Vision",
author = "Uc, {Ergun Y.} and Matthew Rizzo and Anderson, {Steven W.} and Qian Shi and Dawson, {Jeffrey D.}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1016/j.jns.2006.08.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "251",
pages = "35--43",
journal = "Journal of the Neurological Sciences",
issn = "0022-510X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unsafe rear-end collision avoidance in Alzheimer's disease

AU - Uc, Ergun Y.

AU - Rizzo, Matthew

AU - Anderson, Steven W.

AU - Shi, Qian

AU - Dawson, Jeffrey D.

PY - 2006/12/21

Y1 - 2006/12/21

N2 - Drivers with cognitive impairment are at increased odds for vehicular crashes. Rear-end collisions (REC) are among the most common crash types. We tested REC avoidance in 61 drivers with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 115 elderly controls using a high-fidelity interactive driving simulator. After a segment of uneventful driving, each driver suddenly encountered a lead vehicle stopped at an intersection, creating the potential for a collision with lead vehicle or with another vehicle following closely behind the driver. Eighty-nine percent of drivers with AD had unsafe outcomes, either an REC or an risky avoidance behavior (defined as slowing down abruptly or prematurely, or swerving out of the traffic lane) compared to 65% of controls (P = 0.0007). Crash rates were similar in AD (5%) and controls (3%), yet a greater proportion of drivers with AD slowed down abruptly (70% vs. 37%, P < 0.0001) or prematurely (66% vs. 45%, P = 0.0115). Abrupt slowing increased the odds of being struck from behind by the following vehicle (P = 0.0262). Unsafe outcomes were predicted by tests of visual perception, attention, memory, visuospatial/constructional abilities, and executive functions, as well as vehicular control measures during an uneventful driving segment. Drivers with AD had difficulty responding to driving conditions that pose a hazard for a REC. Some cognitive and visual tests were predictive of unsafe outcomes even after adjusting for disease status.

AB - Drivers with cognitive impairment are at increased odds for vehicular crashes. Rear-end collisions (REC) are among the most common crash types. We tested REC avoidance in 61 drivers with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 115 elderly controls using a high-fidelity interactive driving simulator. After a segment of uneventful driving, each driver suddenly encountered a lead vehicle stopped at an intersection, creating the potential for a collision with lead vehicle or with another vehicle following closely behind the driver. Eighty-nine percent of drivers with AD had unsafe outcomes, either an REC or an risky avoidance behavior (defined as slowing down abruptly or prematurely, or swerving out of the traffic lane) compared to 65% of controls (P = 0.0007). Crash rates were similar in AD (5%) and controls (3%), yet a greater proportion of drivers with AD slowed down abruptly (70% vs. 37%, P < 0.0001) or prematurely (66% vs. 45%, P = 0.0115). Abrupt slowing increased the odds of being struck from behind by the following vehicle (P = 0.0262). Unsafe outcomes were predicted by tests of visual perception, attention, memory, visuospatial/constructional abilities, and executive functions, as well as vehicular control measures during an uneventful driving segment. Drivers with AD had difficulty responding to driving conditions that pose a hazard for a REC. Some cognitive and visual tests were predictive of unsafe outcomes even after adjusting for disease status.

KW - Alzheimer's disease

KW - Cognition

KW - Crash

KW - Dementia

KW - Driving

KW - Traffic accident

KW - Vision

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751201494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751201494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jns.2006.08.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jns.2006.08.011

M3 - Article

VL - 251

SP - 35

EP - 43

JO - Journal of the Neurological Sciences

JF - Journal of the Neurological Sciences

SN - 0022-510X

IS - 1-2

ER -