Unilateral visual cueing and asymmetric line geometry share a common attentional origin in the modulation of pseudoneglect

Mark E. McCourt, Matt Garlinghouse, Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Numerous factors influence the leftward bias (pseudoneglect) in perceived line midpoint of normal subjects in line bisection tasks. Cues are a potent factor; left and right cues promote shifts in perceived midpoint to the left and right, respectively. Trapezoidal lines have recently been shown to influence perceived line midpoint, displacing it toward the larger side. The present experiments test the hypothesis that the effect of line geometry, like that of unilateral cues, results from an exogenous recruitment of spatial attention. Normal right-handed subjects (N = 60) participated in two experiments employing a tachistoscopic forced-choice line bisection task. Experiment 1 crossed the effect of cue position and cue contrast, and confirmed that a significant interaction could be obtained. Experiment 2 crossed the effect of line geometry and cue position, revealing that line geometry and cue location both significantly influence perceived line midpoint, and produce a significant interaction. According to Additive Factors Logic the finding that spatial cueing interacts with line geometry suggests that both types of stimuli modulate spatial attention at a common site of processing, supporting the conclusion that the effect of line geometry itself derives from asymmetric cueing. An explanation for the interaction is offered that is based on the existence of a hypothesized compressive nonlinearity that maps attentional bias to perceptual error.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)499-511
Number of pages13
JournalCortex
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2005

Fingerprint

Cues

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Cueing
  • Line bisection
  • Perception
  • Pseudoneglect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Unilateral visual cueing and asymmetric line geometry share a common attentional origin in the modulation of pseudoneglect. / McCourt, Mark E.; Garlinghouse, Matt; Reuter-Lorenz, Patricia A.

In: Cortex, Vol. 41, No. 4, 08.2005, p. 499-511.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{01aec13e4dd040e2ab560d26eace28ba,
title = "Unilateral visual cueing and asymmetric line geometry share a common attentional origin in the modulation of pseudoneglect",
abstract = "Numerous factors influence the leftward bias (pseudoneglect) in perceived line midpoint of normal subjects in line bisection tasks. Cues are a potent factor; left and right cues promote shifts in perceived midpoint to the left and right, respectively. Trapezoidal lines have recently been shown to influence perceived line midpoint, displacing it toward the larger side. The present experiments test the hypothesis that the effect of line geometry, like that of unilateral cues, results from an exogenous recruitment of spatial attention. Normal right-handed subjects (N = 60) participated in two experiments employing a tachistoscopic forced-choice line bisection task. Experiment 1 crossed the effect of cue position and cue contrast, and confirmed that a significant interaction could be obtained. Experiment 2 crossed the effect of line geometry and cue position, revealing that line geometry and cue location both significantly influence perceived line midpoint, and produce a significant interaction. According to Additive Factors Logic the finding that spatial cueing interacts with line geometry suggests that both types of stimuli modulate spatial attention at a common site of processing, supporting the conclusion that the effect of line geometry itself derives from asymmetric cueing. An explanation for the interaction is offered that is based on the existence of a hypothesized compressive nonlinearity that maps attentional bias to perceptual error.",
keywords = "Attention, Cueing, Line bisection, Perception, Pseudoneglect",
author = "McCourt, {Mark E.} and Matt Garlinghouse and Reuter-Lorenz, {Patricia A.}",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70190-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "499--511",
journal = "Cortex",
issn = "0010-9452",
publisher = "Masson SpA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unilateral visual cueing and asymmetric line geometry share a common attentional origin in the modulation of pseudoneglect

AU - McCourt, Mark E.

AU - Garlinghouse, Matt

AU - Reuter-Lorenz, Patricia A.

PY - 2005/8

Y1 - 2005/8

N2 - Numerous factors influence the leftward bias (pseudoneglect) in perceived line midpoint of normal subjects in line bisection tasks. Cues are a potent factor; left and right cues promote shifts in perceived midpoint to the left and right, respectively. Trapezoidal lines have recently been shown to influence perceived line midpoint, displacing it toward the larger side. The present experiments test the hypothesis that the effect of line geometry, like that of unilateral cues, results from an exogenous recruitment of spatial attention. Normal right-handed subjects (N = 60) participated in two experiments employing a tachistoscopic forced-choice line bisection task. Experiment 1 crossed the effect of cue position and cue contrast, and confirmed that a significant interaction could be obtained. Experiment 2 crossed the effect of line geometry and cue position, revealing that line geometry and cue location both significantly influence perceived line midpoint, and produce a significant interaction. According to Additive Factors Logic the finding that spatial cueing interacts with line geometry suggests that both types of stimuli modulate spatial attention at a common site of processing, supporting the conclusion that the effect of line geometry itself derives from asymmetric cueing. An explanation for the interaction is offered that is based on the existence of a hypothesized compressive nonlinearity that maps attentional bias to perceptual error.

AB - Numerous factors influence the leftward bias (pseudoneglect) in perceived line midpoint of normal subjects in line bisection tasks. Cues are a potent factor; left and right cues promote shifts in perceived midpoint to the left and right, respectively. Trapezoidal lines have recently been shown to influence perceived line midpoint, displacing it toward the larger side. The present experiments test the hypothesis that the effect of line geometry, like that of unilateral cues, results from an exogenous recruitment of spatial attention. Normal right-handed subjects (N = 60) participated in two experiments employing a tachistoscopic forced-choice line bisection task. Experiment 1 crossed the effect of cue position and cue contrast, and confirmed that a significant interaction could be obtained. Experiment 2 crossed the effect of line geometry and cue position, revealing that line geometry and cue location both significantly influence perceived line midpoint, and produce a significant interaction. According to Additive Factors Logic the finding that spatial cueing interacts with line geometry suggests that both types of stimuli modulate spatial attention at a common site of processing, supporting the conclusion that the effect of line geometry itself derives from asymmetric cueing. An explanation for the interaction is offered that is based on the existence of a hypothesized compressive nonlinearity that maps attentional bias to perceptual error.

KW - Attention

KW - Cueing

KW - Line bisection

KW - Perception

KW - Pseudoneglect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21644431953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21644431953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70190-4

DO - 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70190-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 16042026

AN - SCOPUS:21644431953

VL - 41

SP - 499

EP - 511

JO - Cortex

JF - Cortex

SN - 0010-9452

IS - 4

ER -