Understanding the impact of rural weight loss interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Gwenndolyn C. Porter, Karen Laumb, Tzeyu Michaud, Fabiana Brito, Daniel Petreca, Gina Schwieger, Todd Bartee, Karen H.K. Yeary, Paul A. Estabrooks

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Rural adults have a higher risk of developing obesity than urban adults. Several evidence-based interventions have targeted rural regions, but their impact, defined as reach (number and representativeness of participants) by effectiveness, has not been examined. The purpose of this review was to determine the impact of rural weight loss interventions and the availability of data across dimensions of the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. A systematic review was conducted to identify rural weight loss interventions that targeted adults. RE-AIM-related data were abstracted from each article. We performed a meta-analysis to examine effectiveness. Sixty-four articles reported on rural weight loss interventions, describing 50 unique interventions. The median number of participants was 107. Median participation rate differed between values reported by the authors (62%) and values computed using a standard method (32%). Two studies reported on sample representativeness; none reported comparisons made between target and actual delivery settings. Median weight loss per participant was 3.64 kg. Meta-analyses revealed the interventions achieved a significant weight reduction, and longer-duration interventions resulted in greater weight loss. Rural weight loss interventions appear to be effective in supporting clinically meaningful weight loss but reach and cost outcomes are still difficult to determine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)713-724
Number of pages12
JournalObesity Reviews
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2019

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Weight Loss
Maintenance
Obesity
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • RE-AIM
  • obesity
  • rural health
  • weight loss

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Understanding the impact of rural weight loss interventions : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Porter, Gwenndolyn C.; Laumb, Karen; Michaud, Tzeyu; Brito, Fabiana; Petreca, Daniel; Schwieger, Gina; Bartee, Todd; Yeary, Karen H.K.; Estabrooks, Paul A.

In: Obesity Reviews, Vol. 20, No. 5, 05.2019, p. 713-724.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Porter, Gwenndolyn C. ; Laumb, Karen ; Michaud, Tzeyu ; Brito, Fabiana ; Petreca, Daniel ; Schwieger, Gina ; Bartee, Todd ; Yeary, Karen H.K. ; Estabrooks, Paul A. / Understanding the impact of rural weight loss interventions : A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Obesity Reviews. 2019 ; Vol. 20, No. 5. pp. 713-724.
@article{9dd7332176ee4029b9e9d3fa112779a1,
title = "Understanding the impact of rural weight loss interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Rural adults have a higher risk of developing obesity than urban adults. Several evidence-based interventions have targeted rural regions, but their impact, defined as reach (number and representativeness of participants) by effectiveness, has not been examined. The purpose of this review was to determine the impact of rural weight loss interventions and the availability of data across dimensions of the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. A systematic review was conducted to identify rural weight loss interventions that targeted adults. RE-AIM-related data were abstracted from each article. We performed a meta-analysis to examine effectiveness. Sixty-four articles reported on rural weight loss interventions, describing 50 unique interventions. The median number of participants was 107. Median participation rate differed between values reported by the authors (62{\%}) and values computed using a standard method (32{\%}). Two studies reported on sample representativeness; none reported comparisons made between target and actual delivery settings. Median weight loss per participant was 3.64 kg. Meta-analyses revealed the interventions achieved a significant weight reduction, and longer-duration interventions resulted in greater weight loss. Rural weight loss interventions appear to be effective in supporting clinically meaningful weight loss but reach and cost outcomes are still difficult to determine.",
keywords = "RE-AIM, obesity, rural health, weight loss",
author = "Porter, {Gwenndolyn C.} and Karen Laumb and Tzeyu Michaud and Fabiana Brito and Daniel Petreca and Gina Schwieger and Todd Bartee and Yeary, {Karen H.K.} and Estabrooks, {Paul A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/obr.12825",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "713--724",
journal = "Obesity Reviews",
issn = "1467-7881",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the impact of rural weight loss interventions

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Porter, Gwenndolyn C.

AU - Laumb, Karen

AU - Michaud, Tzeyu

AU - Brito, Fabiana

AU - Petreca, Daniel

AU - Schwieger, Gina

AU - Bartee, Todd

AU - Yeary, Karen H.K.

AU - Estabrooks, Paul A.

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - Rural adults have a higher risk of developing obesity than urban adults. Several evidence-based interventions have targeted rural regions, but their impact, defined as reach (number and representativeness of participants) by effectiveness, has not been examined. The purpose of this review was to determine the impact of rural weight loss interventions and the availability of data across dimensions of the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. A systematic review was conducted to identify rural weight loss interventions that targeted adults. RE-AIM-related data were abstracted from each article. We performed a meta-analysis to examine effectiveness. Sixty-four articles reported on rural weight loss interventions, describing 50 unique interventions. The median number of participants was 107. Median participation rate differed between values reported by the authors (62%) and values computed using a standard method (32%). Two studies reported on sample representativeness; none reported comparisons made between target and actual delivery settings. Median weight loss per participant was 3.64 kg. Meta-analyses revealed the interventions achieved a significant weight reduction, and longer-duration interventions resulted in greater weight loss. Rural weight loss interventions appear to be effective in supporting clinically meaningful weight loss but reach and cost outcomes are still difficult to determine.

AB - Rural adults have a higher risk of developing obesity than urban adults. Several evidence-based interventions have targeted rural regions, but their impact, defined as reach (number and representativeness of participants) by effectiveness, has not been examined. The purpose of this review was to determine the impact of rural weight loss interventions and the availability of data across dimensions of the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. A systematic review was conducted to identify rural weight loss interventions that targeted adults. RE-AIM-related data were abstracted from each article. We performed a meta-analysis to examine effectiveness. Sixty-four articles reported on rural weight loss interventions, describing 50 unique interventions. The median number of participants was 107. Median participation rate differed between values reported by the authors (62%) and values computed using a standard method (32%). Two studies reported on sample representativeness; none reported comparisons made between target and actual delivery settings. Median weight loss per participant was 3.64 kg. Meta-analyses revealed the interventions achieved a significant weight reduction, and longer-duration interventions resulted in greater weight loss. Rural weight loss interventions appear to be effective in supporting clinically meaningful weight loss but reach and cost outcomes are still difficult to determine.

KW - RE-AIM

KW - obesity

KW - rural health

KW - weight loss

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059885792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059885792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/obr.12825

DO - 10.1111/obr.12825

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30633845

AN - SCOPUS:85059885792

VL - 20

SP - 713

EP - 724

JO - Obesity Reviews

JF - Obesity Reviews

SN - 1467-7881

IS - 5

ER -