Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery

John D. Birkmeyer, Bradley N. Reames, Peter McCulloch, Andrew J. Carr, W. Bruce Campbell, John E. Wennberg

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

216 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of common surgical procedures varies widely across regions. Differences in illness burden, diagnostic practices, and patient attitudes about medical intervention explain only a small degree of regional variation in surgery rates. Evidence suggests that surgical variation results mainly from differences in physician beliefs about the indications for surgery, and the extent to which patient preferences are incorporated into treatment decisions. These two components of clinical decision making help to explain the so-called surgical signatures of specific procedures, and why some consistently vary more than others. Variation in clinical decision making is, in turn, affected by broad environmental factors, including technology diffusion, supply of specialists, local training frameworks, financial incentives, and regulatory factors, which vary across countries. Better scientific evidence about the comparative effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical interventions could help to mitigate regional variation, but broader dissemination of shared decision aids will be essential to reduce variation in preference-sensitive disorders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1121-1129
Number of pages9
JournalThe Lancet
Volume382
Issue number9898
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Cost of Illness
Decision Support Techniques
Patient Preference
Motivation
Technology
Physicians
Clinical Decision-Making
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Birkmeyer, J. D., Reames, B. N., McCulloch, P., Carr, A. J., Campbell, W. B., & Wennberg, J. E. (2013). Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery. The Lancet, 382(9898), 1121-1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61215-5

Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery. / Birkmeyer, John D.; Reames, Bradley N.; McCulloch, Peter; Carr, Andrew J.; Campbell, W. Bruce; Wennberg, John E.

In: The Lancet, Vol. 382, No. 9898, 01.01.2013, p. 1121-1129.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Birkmeyer, JD, Reames, BN, McCulloch, P, Carr, AJ, Campbell, WB & Wennberg, JE 2013, 'Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery', The Lancet, vol. 382, no. 9898, pp. 1121-1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61215-5
Birkmeyer JD, Reames BN, McCulloch P, Carr AJ, Campbell WB, Wennberg JE. Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery. The Lancet. 2013 Jan 1;382(9898):1121-1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61215-5
Birkmeyer, John D. ; Reames, Bradley N. ; McCulloch, Peter ; Carr, Andrew J. ; Campbell, W. Bruce ; Wennberg, John E. / Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery. In: The Lancet. 2013 ; Vol. 382, No. 9898. pp. 1121-1129.
@article{61ff2776e31c48ee8d6eb523f4507971,
title = "Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery",
abstract = "The use of common surgical procedures varies widely across regions. Differences in illness burden, diagnostic practices, and patient attitudes about medical intervention explain only a small degree of regional variation in surgery rates. Evidence suggests that surgical variation results mainly from differences in physician beliefs about the indications for surgery, and the extent to which patient preferences are incorporated into treatment decisions. These two components of clinical decision making help to explain the so-called surgical signatures of specific procedures, and why some consistently vary more than others. Variation in clinical decision making is, in turn, affected by broad environmental factors, including technology diffusion, supply of specialists, local training frameworks, financial incentives, and regulatory factors, which vary across countries. Better scientific evidence about the comparative effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical interventions could help to mitigate regional variation, but broader dissemination of shared decision aids will be essential to reduce variation in preference-sensitive disorders.",
author = "Birkmeyer, {John D.} and Reames, {Bradley N.} and Peter McCulloch and Carr, {Andrew J.} and Campbell, {W. Bruce} and Wennberg, {John E.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61215-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "382",
pages = "1121--1129",
journal = "The Lancet",
issn = "0140-6736",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "9898",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery

AU - Birkmeyer, John D.

AU - Reames, Bradley N.

AU - McCulloch, Peter

AU - Carr, Andrew J.

AU - Campbell, W. Bruce

AU - Wennberg, John E.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - The use of common surgical procedures varies widely across regions. Differences in illness burden, diagnostic practices, and patient attitudes about medical intervention explain only a small degree of regional variation in surgery rates. Evidence suggests that surgical variation results mainly from differences in physician beliefs about the indications for surgery, and the extent to which patient preferences are incorporated into treatment decisions. These two components of clinical decision making help to explain the so-called surgical signatures of specific procedures, and why some consistently vary more than others. Variation in clinical decision making is, in turn, affected by broad environmental factors, including technology diffusion, supply of specialists, local training frameworks, financial incentives, and regulatory factors, which vary across countries. Better scientific evidence about the comparative effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical interventions could help to mitigate regional variation, but broader dissemination of shared decision aids will be essential to reduce variation in preference-sensitive disorders.

AB - The use of common surgical procedures varies widely across regions. Differences in illness burden, diagnostic practices, and patient attitudes about medical intervention explain only a small degree of regional variation in surgery rates. Evidence suggests that surgical variation results mainly from differences in physician beliefs about the indications for surgery, and the extent to which patient preferences are incorporated into treatment decisions. These two components of clinical decision making help to explain the so-called surgical signatures of specific procedures, and why some consistently vary more than others. Variation in clinical decision making is, in turn, affected by broad environmental factors, including technology diffusion, supply of specialists, local training frameworks, financial incentives, and regulatory factors, which vary across countries. Better scientific evidence about the comparative effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical interventions could help to mitigate regional variation, but broader dissemination of shared decision aids will be essential to reduce variation in preference-sensitive disorders.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884606757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884606757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61215-5

DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61215-5

M3 - Review article

C2 - 24075052

AN - SCOPUS:84884606757

VL - 382

SP - 1121

EP - 1129

JO - The Lancet

JF - The Lancet

SN - 0140-6736

IS - 9898

ER -