Understanding how consumers with food allergies make decisions based on precautionary labelling

Audrey DunnGalvin, Graham Roberts, Lynne Regent, Moira Austin, Fiona Kenna, Sabine Schnadt, Angel Sanchez-Sanz, Pilar Hernandez, Bettina Hjorth, Montserrat Fernandez-Rivas, Steve Taylor, Joseph Baumert, Aziz Sheikh, Sian Astley, Rene Crevel, Clare Mills

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Understanding consumer perceptions is crucial if effective food safety policy and risk communication are to be developed and implemented. We sought to understand how those living with food allergy assess risk with precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) and their preference in how risks are communicated within a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) framework. Methods: The Integrated Approaches to Food Allergen and Allergy Risk Management (iFAAM) labelling online survey was developed for adults and parents of children with food allergy and distributed across Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Spain and UK via patient support groups. Results: There were 1560 complete responses. ‘This product is not suitable for’ was selected as first choice for PAL by 46% overall and ‘May contain’ was selected as the first choice by 44%. Seventy-three percent reported that it would improve their trust in a product if a QRA process had been used to make a decision about whether to include ‘may contain’. Overall, 66% reported that a ‘statement + symbol’ on the label indicating a QRA, would help them to understand the risk assessment process that had been used by the food manufacturer. Conclusions: Consumers want to know what process has actually taken place for the placing of a PAL and/or risk assessment statement on a particular food product. Our findings provide a basis for the development of more informative communication around food allergen risk and safety and support evidence-based policy-making in the context of the legislative requirements of the European Union's Food Information for Consumers Regulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1446-1454
Number of pages9
JournalClinical and Experimental Allergy
Volume49
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

Fingerprint

Food Hypersensitivity
Allergens
Food
Communication
Nutrition Policy
Food Safety
Self-Help Groups
Policy Making
Risk Management
European Union
Ireland
Netherlands
Spain
Germany
Parents
Safety

Keywords

  • food allergy
  • precautionary allergen labelling
  • quantitative risk assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Cite this

DunnGalvin, A., Roberts, G., Regent, L., Austin, M., Kenna, F., Schnadt, S., ... Mills, C. (2019). Understanding how consumers with food allergies make decisions based on precautionary labelling. Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 49(11), 1446-1454. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.13479

Understanding how consumers with food allergies make decisions based on precautionary labelling. / DunnGalvin, Audrey; Roberts, Graham; Regent, Lynne; Austin, Moira; Kenna, Fiona; Schnadt, Sabine; Sanchez-Sanz, Angel; Hernandez, Pilar; Hjorth, Bettina; Fernandez-Rivas, Montserrat; Taylor, Steve; Baumert, Joseph; Sheikh, Aziz; Astley, Sian; Crevel, Rene; Mills, Clare.

In: Clinical and Experimental Allergy, Vol. 49, No. 11, 01.11.2019, p. 1446-1454.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DunnGalvin, A, Roberts, G, Regent, L, Austin, M, Kenna, F, Schnadt, S, Sanchez-Sanz, A, Hernandez, P, Hjorth, B, Fernandez-Rivas, M, Taylor, S, Baumert, J, Sheikh, A, Astley, S, Crevel, R & Mills, C 2019, 'Understanding how consumers with food allergies make decisions based on precautionary labelling', Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 1446-1454. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.13479
DunnGalvin, Audrey ; Roberts, Graham ; Regent, Lynne ; Austin, Moira ; Kenna, Fiona ; Schnadt, Sabine ; Sanchez-Sanz, Angel ; Hernandez, Pilar ; Hjorth, Bettina ; Fernandez-Rivas, Montserrat ; Taylor, Steve ; Baumert, Joseph ; Sheikh, Aziz ; Astley, Sian ; Crevel, Rene ; Mills, Clare. / Understanding how consumers with food allergies make decisions based on precautionary labelling. In: Clinical and Experimental Allergy. 2019 ; Vol. 49, No. 11. pp. 1446-1454.
@article{3e09cdffbf5c4ee1a1241eb52e4a1796,
title = "Understanding how consumers with food allergies make decisions based on precautionary labelling",
abstract = "Background: Understanding consumer perceptions is crucial if effective food safety policy and risk communication are to be developed and implemented. We sought to understand how those living with food allergy assess risk with precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) and their preference in how risks are communicated within a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) framework. Methods: The Integrated Approaches to Food Allergen and Allergy Risk Management (iFAAM) labelling online survey was developed for adults and parents of children with food allergy and distributed across Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Spain and UK via patient support groups. Results: There were 1560 complete responses. ‘This product is not suitable for’ was selected as first choice for PAL by 46{\%} overall and ‘May contain’ was selected as the first choice by 44{\%}. Seventy-three percent reported that it would improve their trust in a product if a QRA process had been used to make a decision about whether to include ‘may contain’. Overall, 66{\%} reported that a ‘statement + symbol’ on the label indicating a QRA, would help them to understand the risk assessment process that had been used by the food manufacturer. Conclusions: Consumers want to know what process has actually taken place for the placing of a PAL and/or risk assessment statement on a particular food product. Our findings provide a basis for the development of more informative communication around food allergen risk and safety and support evidence-based policy-making in the context of the legislative requirements of the European Union's Food Information for Consumers Regulation.",
keywords = "food allergy, precautionary allergen labelling, quantitative risk assessment",
author = "Audrey DunnGalvin and Graham Roberts and Lynne Regent and Moira Austin and Fiona Kenna and Sabine Schnadt and Angel Sanchez-Sanz and Pilar Hernandez and Bettina Hjorth and Montserrat Fernandez-Rivas and Steve Taylor and Joseph Baumert and Aziz Sheikh and Sian Astley and Rene Crevel and Clare Mills",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cea.13479",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "1446--1454",
journal = "Clinical and Experimental Allergy",
issn = "0954-7894",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding how consumers with food allergies make decisions based on precautionary labelling

AU - DunnGalvin, Audrey

AU - Roberts, Graham

AU - Regent, Lynne

AU - Austin, Moira

AU - Kenna, Fiona

AU - Schnadt, Sabine

AU - Sanchez-Sanz, Angel

AU - Hernandez, Pilar

AU - Hjorth, Bettina

AU - Fernandez-Rivas, Montserrat

AU - Taylor, Steve

AU - Baumert, Joseph

AU - Sheikh, Aziz

AU - Astley, Sian

AU - Crevel, Rene

AU - Mills, Clare

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Background: Understanding consumer perceptions is crucial if effective food safety policy and risk communication are to be developed and implemented. We sought to understand how those living with food allergy assess risk with precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) and their preference in how risks are communicated within a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) framework. Methods: The Integrated Approaches to Food Allergen and Allergy Risk Management (iFAAM) labelling online survey was developed for adults and parents of children with food allergy and distributed across Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Spain and UK via patient support groups. Results: There were 1560 complete responses. ‘This product is not suitable for’ was selected as first choice for PAL by 46% overall and ‘May contain’ was selected as the first choice by 44%. Seventy-three percent reported that it would improve their trust in a product if a QRA process had been used to make a decision about whether to include ‘may contain’. Overall, 66% reported that a ‘statement + symbol’ on the label indicating a QRA, would help them to understand the risk assessment process that had been used by the food manufacturer. Conclusions: Consumers want to know what process has actually taken place for the placing of a PAL and/or risk assessment statement on a particular food product. Our findings provide a basis for the development of more informative communication around food allergen risk and safety and support evidence-based policy-making in the context of the legislative requirements of the European Union's Food Information for Consumers Regulation.

AB - Background: Understanding consumer perceptions is crucial if effective food safety policy and risk communication are to be developed and implemented. We sought to understand how those living with food allergy assess risk with precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) and their preference in how risks are communicated within a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) framework. Methods: The Integrated Approaches to Food Allergen and Allergy Risk Management (iFAAM) labelling online survey was developed for adults and parents of children with food allergy and distributed across Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Spain and UK via patient support groups. Results: There were 1560 complete responses. ‘This product is not suitable for’ was selected as first choice for PAL by 46% overall and ‘May contain’ was selected as the first choice by 44%. Seventy-three percent reported that it would improve their trust in a product if a QRA process had been used to make a decision about whether to include ‘may contain’. Overall, 66% reported that a ‘statement + symbol’ on the label indicating a QRA, would help them to understand the risk assessment process that had been used by the food manufacturer. Conclusions: Consumers want to know what process has actually taken place for the placing of a PAL and/or risk assessment statement on a particular food product. Our findings provide a basis for the development of more informative communication around food allergen risk and safety and support evidence-based policy-making in the context of the legislative requirements of the European Union's Food Information for Consumers Regulation.

KW - food allergy

KW - precautionary allergen labelling

KW - quantitative risk assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071447240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071447240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cea.13479

DO - 10.1111/cea.13479

M3 - Article

C2 - 31400020

AN - SCOPUS:85071447240

VL - 49

SP - 1446

EP - 1454

JO - Clinical and Experimental Allergy

JF - Clinical and Experimental Allergy

SN - 0954-7894

IS - 11

ER -