Understanding Functional Communication in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors Using a Mixed Methods Design

Barbara Swore Fletcher, Karen Schumacher, Marlene Z. Cohen, Kevin Kupzyk, William Lydiatt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background Functional communication, defined as everyday communication with family and friends, at work, and in the community, is an important but understudied concept in the head and neck cancer (HNC) survivor population. Objective The aim of this study was to better understand functional communication by using a mixed methods approach. Methods Head and neck cancer survivors participated in semistructured interviews and completed self-report questionnaires assessing multiple aspects of well-being and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). These qualitative and quantitative data were collected concurrently, analyzed separately, and then integrated. Results Survivors' perceptions of functional communication ranged from "Communication is good" to "Communication has changed" to "Communication is difficult." Using these qualitative results, survivors were categorized into 3 mutually exclusive groups. Clinically meaningful cut points were exceeded on measures of depressive symptoms (18%), state (40%) and trait (54%) anxiety, and pain (18%). Health-related quality of life scores were moderate to high for the sample as a whole. Statistically significant group differences were found only on the HNC-specific measure of HRQOL. A surprising finding was that the lowest mean score on social function was in the "Communication has changed" group. This group perceived changes in speech and voice that bothered them when communicating in social situations, although their speech was clear to a listener. Conclusion An underrecognized subpopulation of HNC survivors may exist, whose day-to-day functional communication has changed in ways that impact their relationships and sense of self. Implications for Practice Clinical identification of this subpopulation and provision of appropriate interventions are essential to facilitate optimal HRQOL after HNC treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-128
Number of pages10
JournalCancer Nursing
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Head and Neck Neoplasms
Survivors
Communication
Quality of Life
Self Report
Anxiety
Interviews
Depression
Pain

Keywords

  • Functional communication
  • Head and neck cancer inventory
  • Head and neck cancer survivor
  • Mixed methods design
  • Social and speech activities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Oncology(nursing)

Cite this

Understanding Functional Communication in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors Using a Mixed Methods Design. / Fletcher, Barbara Swore; Schumacher, Karen; Cohen, Marlene Z.; Kupzyk, Kevin; Lydiatt, William.

In: Cancer Nursing, Vol. 42, No. 2, 01.03.2019, p. 119-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fletcher, Barbara Swore ; Schumacher, Karen ; Cohen, Marlene Z. ; Kupzyk, Kevin ; Lydiatt, William. / Understanding Functional Communication in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors Using a Mixed Methods Design. In: Cancer Nursing. 2019 ; Vol. 42, No. 2. pp. 119-128.
@article{be1fe6ee107541dcb07c8eb35e6b3632,
title = "Understanding Functional Communication in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors Using a Mixed Methods Design",
abstract = "Background Functional communication, defined as everyday communication with family and friends, at work, and in the community, is an important but understudied concept in the head and neck cancer (HNC) survivor population. Objective The aim of this study was to better understand functional communication by using a mixed methods approach. Methods Head and neck cancer survivors participated in semistructured interviews and completed self-report questionnaires assessing multiple aspects of well-being and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). These qualitative and quantitative data were collected concurrently, analyzed separately, and then integrated. Results Survivors' perceptions of functional communication ranged from {"}Communication is good{"} to {"}Communication has changed{"} to {"}Communication is difficult.{"} Using these qualitative results, survivors were categorized into 3 mutually exclusive groups. Clinically meaningful cut points were exceeded on measures of depressive symptoms (18{\%}), state (40{\%}) and trait (54{\%}) anxiety, and pain (18{\%}). Health-related quality of life scores were moderate to high for the sample as a whole. Statistically significant group differences were found only on the HNC-specific measure of HRQOL. A surprising finding was that the lowest mean score on social function was in the {"}Communication has changed{"} group. This group perceived changes in speech and voice that bothered them when communicating in social situations, although their speech was clear to a listener. Conclusion An underrecognized subpopulation of HNC survivors may exist, whose day-to-day functional communication has changed in ways that impact their relationships and sense of self. Implications for Practice Clinical identification of this subpopulation and provision of appropriate interventions are essential to facilitate optimal HRQOL after HNC treatment.",
keywords = "Functional communication, Head and neck cancer inventory, Head and neck cancer survivor, Mixed methods design, Social and speech activities",
author = "Fletcher, {Barbara Swore} and Karen Schumacher and Cohen, {Marlene Z.} and Kevin Kupzyk and William Lydiatt",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/NCC.0000000000000569",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "119--128",
journal = "Cancer Nursing",
issn = "0162-220X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding Functional Communication in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors Using a Mixed Methods Design

AU - Fletcher, Barbara Swore

AU - Schumacher, Karen

AU - Cohen, Marlene Z.

AU - Kupzyk, Kevin

AU - Lydiatt, William

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Background Functional communication, defined as everyday communication with family and friends, at work, and in the community, is an important but understudied concept in the head and neck cancer (HNC) survivor population. Objective The aim of this study was to better understand functional communication by using a mixed methods approach. Methods Head and neck cancer survivors participated in semistructured interviews and completed self-report questionnaires assessing multiple aspects of well-being and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). These qualitative and quantitative data were collected concurrently, analyzed separately, and then integrated. Results Survivors' perceptions of functional communication ranged from "Communication is good" to "Communication has changed" to "Communication is difficult." Using these qualitative results, survivors were categorized into 3 mutually exclusive groups. Clinically meaningful cut points were exceeded on measures of depressive symptoms (18%), state (40%) and trait (54%) anxiety, and pain (18%). Health-related quality of life scores were moderate to high for the sample as a whole. Statistically significant group differences were found only on the HNC-specific measure of HRQOL. A surprising finding was that the lowest mean score on social function was in the "Communication has changed" group. This group perceived changes in speech and voice that bothered them when communicating in social situations, although their speech was clear to a listener. Conclusion An underrecognized subpopulation of HNC survivors may exist, whose day-to-day functional communication has changed in ways that impact their relationships and sense of self. Implications for Practice Clinical identification of this subpopulation and provision of appropriate interventions are essential to facilitate optimal HRQOL after HNC treatment.

AB - Background Functional communication, defined as everyday communication with family and friends, at work, and in the community, is an important but understudied concept in the head and neck cancer (HNC) survivor population. Objective The aim of this study was to better understand functional communication by using a mixed methods approach. Methods Head and neck cancer survivors participated in semistructured interviews and completed self-report questionnaires assessing multiple aspects of well-being and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). These qualitative and quantitative data were collected concurrently, analyzed separately, and then integrated. Results Survivors' perceptions of functional communication ranged from "Communication is good" to "Communication has changed" to "Communication is difficult." Using these qualitative results, survivors were categorized into 3 mutually exclusive groups. Clinically meaningful cut points were exceeded on measures of depressive symptoms (18%), state (40%) and trait (54%) anxiety, and pain (18%). Health-related quality of life scores were moderate to high for the sample as a whole. Statistically significant group differences were found only on the HNC-specific measure of HRQOL. A surprising finding was that the lowest mean score on social function was in the "Communication has changed" group. This group perceived changes in speech and voice that bothered them when communicating in social situations, although their speech was clear to a listener. Conclusion An underrecognized subpopulation of HNC survivors may exist, whose day-to-day functional communication has changed in ways that impact their relationships and sense of self. Implications for Practice Clinical identification of this subpopulation and provision of appropriate interventions are essential to facilitate optimal HRQOL after HNC treatment.

KW - Functional communication

KW - Head and neck cancer inventory

KW - Head and neck cancer survivor

KW - Mixed methods design

KW - Social and speech activities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062068686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062068686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000569

DO - 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000569

M3 - Article

C2 - 29489478

AN - SCOPUS:85062068686

VL - 42

SP - 119

EP - 128

JO - Cancer Nursing

JF - Cancer Nursing

SN - 0162-220X

IS - 2

ER -