Two methods for proteomic analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue result in differential protein identification, data quality, and cost

Stephen A. Luebker, Melinda Wojtkiewicz, Scott A Koepsell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is a rich source of clinically relevant material that can yield important translational biomarker discovery using proteomic analysis. Protocols for analyzing FFPE tissue by LC-MS/MS exist, but standardization of procedures and critical analysis of data quality is limited. This study compared and characterized data obtained from FFPE tissue using two methods: a urea in-solution digestion method (UISD) versus a commercially available Qproteome FFPE Tissue Kit method (Qkit). Each method was performed independently three times on serial sections of homogenous FFPE tissue to minimize pre-analytical variations and analyzed with three technical replicates by LC-MS/MS. Data were evaluated for reproducibility and physiochemical distribution, which highlighted differences in the ability of each method to identify proteins of different molecular weights and isoelectric points. Each method replicate resulted in a significant number of new protein identifications, and both methods identified significantly more proteins using three technical replicates as compared to only two. UISD was cheaper, required less time, and introduced significant protein modifications as compared to the Qkit method, which provided more precise and higher protein yields. These data highlight significant variability among method replicates and type of method used, despite minimizing pre-analytical variability. Utilization of only one method or too few replicates (both method and technical) may limit the subset of proteomic information obtained.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3744-3753
Number of pages10
JournalProteomics
Volume15
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2015

Fingerprint

Paraffin
Proteomics
Formaldehyde
Tissue
Costs and Cost Analysis
Costs
Proteins
Urea
Biomarkers
Standardization
Molecular weight
Data Accuracy
Digestion
Isoelectric Point
Molecular Weight

Keywords

  • Biomedicine
  • Clinical proteomic analysis
  • Data quality
  • Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

Two methods for proteomic analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue result in differential protein identification, data quality, and cost. / Luebker, Stephen A.; Wojtkiewicz, Melinda; Koepsell, Scott A.

In: Proteomics, Vol. 15, No. 21, 11.2015, p. 3744-3753.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f6381620fe8043abb3a4b81f06aa3c33,
title = "Two methods for proteomic analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue result in differential protein identification, data quality, and cost",
abstract = "Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is a rich source of clinically relevant material that can yield important translational biomarker discovery using proteomic analysis. Protocols for analyzing FFPE tissue by LC-MS/MS exist, but standardization of procedures and critical analysis of data quality is limited. This study compared and characterized data obtained from FFPE tissue using two methods: a urea in-solution digestion method (UISD) versus a commercially available Qproteome FFPE Tissue Kit method (Qkit). Each method was performed independently three times on serial sections of homogenous FFPE tissue to minimize pre-analytical variations and analyzed with three technical replicates by LC-MS/MS. Data were evaluated for reproducibility and physiochemical distribution, which highlighted differences in the ability of each method to identify proteins of different molecular weights and isoelectric points. Each method replicate resulted in a significant number of new protein identifications, and both methods identified significantly more proteins using three technical replicates as compared to only two. UISD was cheaper, required less time, and introduced significant protein modifications as compared to the Qkit method, which provided more precise and higher protein yields. These data highlight significant variability among method replicates and type of method used, despite minimizing pre-analytical variability. Utilization of only one method or too few replicates (both method and technical) may limit the subset of proteomic information obtained.",
keywords = "Biomedicine, Clinical proteomic analysis, Data quality, Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded",
author = "Luebker, {Stephen A.} and Melinda Wojtkiewicz and Koepsell, {Scott A}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1002/pmic.201500147",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "3744--3753",
journal = "Proteomics",
issn = "1615-9853",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two methods for proteomic analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue result in differential protein identification, data quality, and cost

AU - Luebker, Stephen A.

AU - Wojtkiewicz, Melinda

AU - Koepsell, Scott A

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is a rich source of clinically relevant material that can yield important translational biomarker discovery using proteomic analysis. Protocols for analyzing FFPE tissue by LC-MS/MS exist, but standardization of procedures and critical analysis of data quality is limited. This study compared and characterized data obtained from FFPE tissue using two methods: a urea in-solution digestion method (UISD) versus a commercially available Qproteome FFPE Tissue Kit method (Qkit). Each method was performed independently three times on serial sections of homogenous FFPE tissue to minimize pre-analytical variations and analyzed with three technical replicates by LC-MS/MS. Data were evaluated for reproducibility and physiochemical distribution, which highlighted differences in the ability of each method to identify proteins of different molecular weights and isoelectric points. Each method replicate resulted in a significant number of new protein identifications, and both methods identified significantly more proteins using three technical replicates as compared to only two. UISD was cheaper, required less time, and introduced significant protein modifications as compared to the Qkit method, which provided more precise and higher protein yields. These data highlight significant variability among method replicates and type of method used, despite minimizing pre-analytical variability. Utilization of only one method or too few replicates (both method and technical) may limit the subset of proteomic information obtained.

AB - Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is a rich source of clinically relevant material that can yield important translational biomarker discovery using proteomic analysis. Protocols for analyzing FFPE tissue by LC-MS/MS exist, but standardization of procedures and critical analysis of data quality is limited. This study compared and characterized data obtained from FFPE tissue using two methods: a urea in-solution digestion method (UISD) versus a commercially available Qproteome FFPE Tissue Kit method (Qkit). Each method was performed independently three times on serial sections of homogenous FFPE tissue to minimize pre-analytical variations and analyzed with three technical replicates by LC-MS/MS. Data were evaluated for reproducibility and physiochemical distribution, which highlighted differences in the ability of each method to identify proteins of different molecular weights and isoelectric points. Each method replicate resulted in a significant number of new protein identifications, and both methods identified significantly more proteins using three technical replicates as compared to only two. UISD was cheaper, required less time, and introduced significant protein modifications as compared to the Qkit method, which provided more precise and higher protein yields. These data highlight significant variability among method replicates and type of method used, despite minimizing pre-analytical variability. Utilization of only one method or too few replicates (both method and technical) may limit the subset of proteomic information obtained.

KW - Biomedicine

KW - Clinical proteomic analysis

KW - Data quality

KW - Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945151517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945151517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pmic.201500147

DO - 10.1002/pmic.201500147

M3 - Article

C2 - 26306679

AN - SCOPUS:84945151517

VL - 15

SP - 3744

EP - 3753

JO - Proteomics

JF - Proteomics

SN - 1615-9853

IS - 21

ER -