"Trying" times

Medicalization, intent, and ambiguity in the definition of infertility

Arthur L. Greil, Julia McQuillan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Researchers studying infertility from the perspective of anthropology and other the social sciences seldom examine the assumptions embedded in the biomedical definition of infertility. Implicit in the biomedical definition is the assumption that people can be divided straightforwardly into those who are trying to conceive and those who are not trying to conceive. If being infertile implies "intent to conceive," we must recognize that there are various degrees of intent and that the line between the fertile and the infertile is not as sharp as is usually imagined. Drawing on structured interview data collected from a random sample of Midwestern U.S. women and from qualitative interviews, we demonstrate that that there is a wide range of intent among those classified as infertile according to the biomedical definition. We explore the implications of this for research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)137-156
Number of pages20
JournalMedical Anthropology Quarterly
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2010

Fingerprint

Medicalization
medicalization
Infertility
Interviews
Anthropology
Social Sciences
Research Personnel
qualitative interview
random sample
anthropology
social science
Research
interview
time

Keywords

  • Infertility
  • Medicalization
  • Pregnancy intentions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology

Cite this

"Trying" times : Medicalization, intent, and ambiguity in the definition of infertility. / Greil, Arthur L.; McQuillan, Julia.

In: Medical Anthropology Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 2, 01.06.2010, p. 137-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1db433a8bd074add8be10ea03bd6988b,
title = "{"}Trying{"} times: Medicalization, intent, and ambiguity in the definition of infertility",
abstract = "Researchers studying infertility from the perspective of anthropology and other the social sciences seldom examine the assumptions embedded in the biomedical definition of infertility. Implicit in the biomedical definition is the assumption that people can be divided straightforwardly into those who are trying to conceive and those who are not trying to conceive. If being infertile implies {"}intent to conceive,{"} we must recognize that there are various degrees of intent and that the line between the fertile and the infertile is not as sharp as is usually imagined. Drawing on structured interview data collected from a random sample of Midwestern U.S. women and from qualitative interviews, we demonstrate that that there is a wide range of intent among those classified as infertile according to the biomedical definition. We explore the implications of this for research.",
keywords = "Infertility, Medicalization, Pregnancy intentions",
author = "Greil, {Arthur L.} and Julia McQuillan",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1548-1387.2010.01094.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "137--156",
journal = "Medical Anthropology Quarterly",
issn = "0745-5194",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Trying" times

T2 - Medicalization, intent, and ambiguity in the definition of infertility

AU - Greil, Arthur L.

AU - McQuillan, Julia

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - Researchers studying infertility from the perspective of anthropology and other the social sciences seldom examine the assumptions embedded in the biomedical definition of infertility. Implicit in the biomedical definition is the assumption that people can be divided straightforwardly into those who are trying to conceive and those who are not trying to conceive. If being infertile implies "intent to conceive," we must recognize that there are various degrees of intent and that the line between the fertile and the infertile is not as sharp as is usually imagined. Drawing on structured interview data collected from a random sample of Midwestern U.S. women and from qualitative interviews, we demonstrate that that there is a wide range of intent among those classified as infertile according to the biomedical definition. We explore the implications of this for research.

AB - Researchers studying infertility from the perspective of anthropology and other the social sciences seldom examine the assumptions embedded in the biomedical definition of infertility. Implicit in the biomedical definition is the assumption that people can be divided straightforwardly into those who are trying to conceive and those who are not trying to conceive. If being infertile implies "intent to conceive," we must recognize that there are various degrees of intent and that the line between the fertile and the infertile is not as sharp as is usually imagined. Drawing on structured interview data collected from a random sample of Midwestern U.S. women and from qualitative interviews, we demonstrate that that there is a wide range of intent among those classified as infertile according to the biomedical definition. We explore the implications of this for research.

KW - Infertility

KW - Medicalization

KW - Pregnancy intentions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954613281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954613281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1548-1387.2010.01094.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1548-1387.2010.01094.x

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 137

EP - 156

JO - Medical Anthropology Quarterly

JF - Medical Anthropology Quarterly

SN - 0745-5194

IS - 2

ER -