Translating reference doses into allergen management practice: Challenges for stakeholders

René W.R. Crevel, Joseph L. Baumert, Stefano Luccioli, Athanasia Baka, Sue Hattersley, Jonathan O.B. Hourihane, Stefan Ronsmans, Frans Timmermans, Rachel Ward, Yong joo Chung

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Risk assessment describes the impact of a particular hazard as a function of dose and exposure. It forms the foundation of risk management and contributes to the overall decision-making process, but is not its endpoint. This paper outlines a risk analysis framework to underpin decision-making in the area of allergen cross-contact. Specifically, it identifies challenges relevant to each component of the risk analysis: risk assessment (data gaps and output interpretation); risk management (clear and realistic objectives); and risk communication (clear articulation of risk and benefit). Translation of the outputs from risk assessment models into risk management measures must be informed by a clear understanding of the model outputs and their limitations. This will lead to feasible and achievable risk management objectives, grounded in a level of risk accepted by the different stakeholders, thereby avoiding potential unintended detrimental consequences. Clear, consistent and trustworthy communications actively involving all stakeholders underpin these objectives. The conclusions, integrating the perspectives of different stakeholders, offer a vision where clear, science-based benchmarks form the basis of allergen management and labelling, cutting through the current confusion and uncertainty. Finally, the paper recognises that the proposed framework must be adaptable to new and emerging evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-287
Number of pages11
JournalFood and Chemical Toxicology
Volume67
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2014

Fingerprint

Practice Management
risk management
Risk Management
allergens
Risk management
stakeholders
Allergens
Risk assessment
risk assessment
risk analysis
Risk analysis
dosage
decision making
Decision Making
Decision making
Communication
risk communication
Benchmarking
Confusion
communication (human)

Keywords

  • Eliciting dose
  • Food allergy
  • Probabilistic modelling
  • Public health
  • Reference dose
  • Risk assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Toxicology

Cite this

Crevel, R. W. R., Baumert, J. L., Luccioli, S., Baka, A., Hattersley, S., Hourihane, J. O. B., ... Chung, Y. J. (2014). Translating reference doses into allergen management practice: Challenges for stakeholders. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 67, 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2014.01.033

Translating reference doses into allergen management practice : Challenges for stakeholders. / Crevel, René W.R.; Baumert, Joseph L.; Luccioli, Stefano; Baka, Athanasia; Hattersley, Sue; Hourihane, Jonathan O.B.; Ronsmans, Stefan; Timmermans, Frans; Ward, Rachel; Chung, Yong joo.

In: Food and Chemical Toxicology, Vol. 67, 05.2014, p. 277-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Crevel, RWR, Baumert, JL, Luccioli, S, Baka, A, Hattersley, S, Hourihane, JOB, Ronsmans, S, Timmermans, F, Ward, R & Chung, YJ 2014, 'Translating reference doses into allergen management practice: Challenges for stakeholders', Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 67, pp. 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2014.01.033
Crevel, René W.R. ; Baumert, Joseph L. ; Luccioli, Stefano ; Baka, Athanasia ; Hattersley, Sue ; Hourihane, Jonathan O.B. ; Ronsmans, Stefan ; Timmermans, Frans ; Ward, Rachel ; Chung, Yong joo. / Translating reference doses into allergen management practice : Challenges for stakeholders. In: Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2014 ; Vol. 67. pp. 277-287.
@article{21908cc204e84df5801552771ee778ca,
title = "Translating reference doses into allergen management practice: Challenges for stakeholders",
abstract = "Risk assessment describes the impact of a particular hazard as a function of dose and exposure. It forms the foundation of risk management and contributes to the overall decision-making process, but is not its endpoint. This paper outlines a risk analysis framework to underpin decision-making in the area of allergen cross-contact. Specifically, it identifies challenges relevant to each component of the risk analysis: risk assessment (data gaps and output interpretation); risk management (clear and realistic objectives); and risk communication (clear articulation of risk and benefit). Translation of the outputs from risk assessment models into risk management measures must be informed by a clear understanding of the model outputs and their limitations. This will lead to feasible and achievable risk management objectives, grounded in a level of risk accepted by the different stakeholders, thereby avoiding potential unintended detrimental consequences. Clear, consistent and trustworthy communications actively involving all stakeholders underpin these objectives. The conclusions, integrating the perspectives of different stakeholders, offer a vision where clear, science-based benchmarks form the basis of allergen management and labelling, cutting through the current confusion and uncertainty. Finally, the paper recognises that the proposed framework must be adaptable to new and emerging evidence.",
keywords = "Eliciting dose, Food allergy, Probabilistic modelling, Public health, Reference dose, Risk assessment",
author = "Crevel, {Ren{\'e} W.R.} and Baumert, {Joseph L.} and Stefano Luccioli and Athanasia Baka and Sue Hattersley and Hourihane, {Jonathan O.B.} and Stefan Ronsmans and Frans Timmermans and Rachel Ward and Chung, {Yong joo}",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.fct.2014.01.033",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "277--287",
journal = "Food and Chemical Toxicology",
issn = "0278-6915",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Translating reference doses into allergen management practice

T2 - Challenges for stakeholders

AU - Crevel, René W.R.

AU - Baumert, Joseph L.

AU - Luccioli, Stefano

AU - Baka, Athanasia

AU - Hattersley, Sue

AU - Hourihane, Jonathan O.B.

AU - Ronsmans, Stefan

AU - Timmermans, Frans

AU - Ward, Rachel

AU - Chung, Yong joo

PY - 2014/5

Y1 - 2014/5

N2 - Risk assessment describes the impact of a particular hazard as a function of dose and exposure. It forms the foundation of risk management and contributes to the overall decision-making process, but is not its endpoint. This paper outlines a risk analysis framework to underpin decision-making in the area of allergen cross-contact. Specifically, it identifies challenges relevant to each component of the risk analysis: risk assessment (data gaps and output interpretation); risk management (clear and realistic objectives); and risk communication (clear articulation of risk and benefit). Translation of the outputs from risk assessment models into risk management measures must be informed by a clear understanding of the model outputs and their limitations. This will lead to feasible and achievable risk management objectives, grounded in a level of risk accepted by the different stakeholders, thereby avoiding potential unintended detrimental consequences. Clear, consistent and trustworthy communications actively involving all stakeholders underpin these objectives. The conclusions, integrating the perspectives of different stakeholders, offer a vision where clear, science-based benchmarks form the basis of allergen management and labelling, cutting through the current confusion and uncertainty. Finally, the paper recognises that the proposed framework must be adaptable to new and emerging evidence.

AB - Risk assessment describes the impact of a particular hazard as a function of dose and exposure. It forms the foundation of risk management and contributes to the overall decision-making process, but is not its endpoint. This paper outlines a risk analysis framework to underpin decision-making in the area of allergen cross-contact. Specifically, it identifies challenges relevant to each component of the risk analysis: risk assessment (data gaps and output interpretation); risk management (clear and realistic objectives); and risk communication (clear articulation of risk and benefit). Translation of the outputs from risk assessment models into risk management measures must be informed by a clear understanding of the model outputs and their limitations. This will lead to feasible and achievable risk management objectives, grounded in a level of risk accepted by the different stakeholders, thereby avoiding potential unintended detrimental consequences. Clear, consistent and trustworthy communications actively involving all stakeholders underpin these objectives. The conclusions, integrating the perspectives of different stakeholders, offer a vision where clear, science-based benchmarks form the basis of allergen management and labelling, cutting through the current confusion and uncertainty. Finally, the paper recognises that the proposed framework must be adaptable to new and emerging evidence.

KW - Eliciting dose

KW - Food allergy

KW - Probabilistic modelling

KW - Public health

KW - Reference dose

KW - Risk assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897956923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897956923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fct.2014.01.033

DO - 10.1016/j.fct.2014.01.033

M3 - Review article

C2 - 24491260

AN - SCOPUS:84897956923

VL - 67

SP - 277

EP - 287

JO - Food and Chemical Toxicology

JF - Food and Chemical Toxicology

SN - 0278-6915

ER -