Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery: is one technique superior?

Alyson A. Melin, Sudhir Kalaskar, Lindsay Taylor, Jon S Thompson, Charles Ternent, Sean J Langenfeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) have been shown to improve the quality of transanal resections, allowing for improved visibility and access to the proximal rectum. This study compares the short-term outcomes between TEM and TAMIS among experienced colorectal surgeons. Method A retrospective review was conducted for TEM and TAMIS performed from 2012 to 2015 by local colorectal surgeons. Baseline patient demographics, operative variables, pathology results, and short-term outcomes were assessed. Results Sixty-nine patients were identified (40 TEM and 29 TAMIS). Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, operative variables, margin status, and postoperative complications were similar for both. Volume of resection was higher for TAMIS (P <.001). Lymph node retrieval was achieved in 17.2% of TAMIS cases compared with 0% of TEM (P =.01). Conclusions TAMIS appears to have equivalent indications and outcomes compared with TEM. TAMIS is associated with larger specimens and more frequent presence of mesorectal lymph nodes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1063-1067
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican journal of surgery
Volume212
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Lymph Nodes
Demography
Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery
Rectum
Pathology

Keywords

  • Rectal cancer
  • Transanal endoscopic microsurgery
  • Transanal minimally invasive surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery : is one technique superior? / Melin, Alyson A.; Kalaskar, Sudhir; Taylor, Lindsay; Thompson, Jon S; Ternent, Charles; Langenfeld, Sean J.

In: American journal of surgery, Vol. 212, No. 6, 01.12.2016, p. 1063-1067.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Melin, Alyson A. ; Kalaskar, Sudhir ; Taylor, Lindsay ; Thompson, Jon S ; Ternent, Charles ; Langenfeld, Sean J. / Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery : is one technique superior?. In: American journal of surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 212, No. 6. pp. 1063-1067.
@article{036beecd0124447fb6833db3f4847ca9,
title = "Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery: is one technique superior?",
abstract = "Background Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) have been shown to improve the quality of transanal resections, allowing for improved visibility and access to the proximal rectum. This study compares the short-term outcomes between TEM and TAMIS among experienced colorectal surgeons. Method A retrospective review was conducted for TEM and TAMIS performed from 2012 to 2015 by local colorectal surgeons. Baseline patient demographics, operative variables, pathology results, and short-term outcomes were assessed. Results Sixty-nine patients were identified (40 TEM and 29 TAMIS). Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, operative variables, margin status, and postoperative complications were similar for both. Volume of resection was higher for TAMIS (P <.001). Lymph node retrieval was achieved in 17.2{\%} of TAMIS cases compared with 0{\%} of TEM (P =.01). Conclusions TAMIS appears to have equivalent indications and outcomes compared with TEM. TAMIS is associated with larger specimens and more frequent presence of mesorectal lymph nodes.",
keywords = "Rectal cancer, Transanal endoscopic microsurgery, Transanal minimally invasive surgery",
author = "Melin, {Alyson A.} and Sudhir Kalaskar and Lindsay Taylor and Thompson, {Jon S} and Charles Ternent and Langenfeld, {Sean J}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "212",
pages = "1063--1067",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery

T2 - is one technique superior?

AU - Melin, Alyson A.

AU - Kalaskar, Sudhir

AU - Taylor, Lindsay

AU - Thompson, Jon S

AU - Ternent, Charles

AU - Langenfeld, Sean J

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Background Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) have been shown to improve the quality of transanal resections, allowing for improved visibility and access to the proximal rectum. This study compares the short-term outcomes between TEM and TAMIS among experienced colorectal surgeons. Method A retrospective review was conducted for TEM and TAMIS performed from 2012 to 2015 by local colorectal surgeons. Baseline patient demographics, operative variables, pathology results, and short-term outcomes were assessed. Results Sixty-nine patients were identified (40 TEM and 29 TAMIS). Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, operative variables, margin status, and postoperative complications were similar for both. Volume of resection was higher for TAMIS (P <.001). Lymph node retrieval was achieved in 17.2% of TAMIS cases compared with 0% of TEM (P =.01). Conclusions TAMIS appears to have equivalent indications and outcomes compared with TEM. TAMIS is associated with larger specimens and more frequent presence of mesorectal lymph nodes.

AB - Background Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) have been shown to improve the quality of transanal resections, allowing for improved visibility and access to the proximal rectum. This study compares the short-term outcomes between TEM and TAMIS among experienced colorectal surgeons. Method A retrospective review was conducted for TEM and TAMIS performed from 2012 to 2015 by local colorectal surgeons. Baseline patient demographics, operative variables, pathology results, and short-term outcomes were assessed. Results Sixty-nine patients were identified (40 TEM and 29 TAMIS). Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, operative variables, margin status, and postoperative complications were similar for both. Volume of resection was higher for TAMIS (P <.001). Lymph node retrieval was achieved in 17.2% of TAMIS cases compared with 0% of TEM (P =.01). Conclusions TAMIS appears to have equivalent indications and outcomes compared with TEM. TAMIS is associated with larger specimens and more frequent presence of mesorectal lymph nodes.

KW - Rectal cancer

KW - Transanal endoscopic microsurgery

KW - Transanal minimally invasive surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84999289194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84999289194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.017

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 27810138

AN - SCOPUS:84999289194

VL - 212

SP - 1063

EP - 1067

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 6

ER -