Training future surgical scientists: Realities and recommendations

James W. Suliburk, Lillian S. Kao, Rosemary A. Kozar, David W. Mercer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine factors influencing surgical research and assess the current state of training future surgical scientists. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The number of surgeons actively engaged in research seems to be decreasing. Training future surgical scientists to increase these numbers depends on a variety of factors that are constantly changing. Current trends at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and changes in graduate medical education make the training of the next generation of surgical scientists more challenging than ever. METHODS: Recent literature in surgical education, surgical research, and funding patterns at the NIH were reviewed. RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative deficiencies exist in surgical research. Although an increasing number of students are becoming interested in surgery, the burden of debt from medical school may preclude them from pursuing research during or after residency. Research training is complicated by the fact that no formal curriculum exists for training in research and oversight is lacking. Junior faculty face increased demands for clinical revenue, which decreases time for research. In addition, surgeons are less successful at obtaining NIH funding when compared with nonsurgeons and seem to be at a disadvantage. CONCLUSIONS: Development of the next generation of surgical scientists begins by attracting the best students into surgery and by providing a structured research curriculum with appropriate oversight. Senior surgical faculty need to become more active at the NIH and provide appropriate financial support and mentorship for residents and junior faculty engaged in research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)741-749
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of surgery
Volume247
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2008

Fingerprint

Research
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Curriculum
Students
Graduate Medical Education
Financial Support
Mentors
Internship and Residency
Medical Schools
Education
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Training future surgical scientists : Realities and recommendations. / Suliburk, James W.; Kao, Lillian S.; Kozar, Rosemary A.; Mercer, David W.

In: Annals of surgery, Vol. 247, No. 5, 01.05.2008, p. 741-749.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Suliburk, James W. ; Kao, Lillian S. ; Kozar, Rosemary A. ; Mercer, David W. / Training future surgical scientists : Realities and recommendations. In: Annals of surgery. 2008 ; Vol. 247, No. 5. pp. 741-749.
@article{ddb5c3c2972b42bab351866bfe2a9a3c,
title = "Training future surgical scientists: Realities and recommendations",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To examine factors influencing surgical research and assess the current state of training future surgical scientists. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The number of surgeons actively engaged in research seems to be decreasing. Training future surgical scientists to increase these numbers depends on a variety of factors that are constantly changing. Current trends at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and changes in graduate medical education make the training of the next generation of surgical scientists more challenging than ever. METHODS: Recent literature in surgical education, surgical research, and funding patterns at the NIH were reviewed. RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative deficiencies exist in surgical research. Although an increasing number of students are becoming interested in surgery, the burden of debt from medical school may preclude them from pursuing research during or after residency. Research training is complicated by the fact that no formal curriculum exists for training in research and oversight is lacking. Junior faculty face increased demands for clinical revenue, which decreases time for research. In addition, surgeons are less successful at obtaining NIH funding when compared with nonsurgeons and seem to be at a disadvantage. CONCLUSIONS: Development of the next generation of surgical scientists begins by attracting the best students into surgery and by providing a structured research curriculum with appropriate oversight. Senior surgical faculty need to become more active at the NIH and provide appropriate financial support and mentorship for residents and junior faculty engaged in research.",
author = "Suliburk, {James W.} and Kao, {Lillian S.} and Kozar, {Rosemary A.} and Mercer, {David W.}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SLA.0b013e318163d27d",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "247",
pages = "741--749",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Training future surgical scientists

T2 - Realities and recommendations

AU - Suliburk, James W.

AU - Kao, Lillian S.

AU - Kozar, Rosemary A.

AU - Mercer, David W.

PY - 2008/5/1

Y1 - 2008/5/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To examine factors influencing surgical research and assess the current state of training future surgical scientists. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The number of surgeons actively engaged in research seems to be decreasing. Training future surgical scientists to increase these numbers depends on a variety of factors that are constantly changing. Current trends at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and changes in graduate medical education make the training of the next generation of surgical scientists more challenging than ever. METHODS: Recent literature in surgical education, surgical research, and funding patterns at the NIH were reviewed. RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative deficiencies exist in surgical research. Although an increasing number of students are becoming interested in surgery, the burden of debt from medical school may preclude them from pursuing research during or after residency. Research training is complicated by the fact that no formal curriculum exists for training in research and oversight is lacking. Junior faculty face increased demands for clinical revenue, which decreases time for research. In addition, surgeons are less successful at obtaining NIH funding when compared with nonsurgeons and seem to be at a disadvantage. CONCLUSIONS: Development of the next generation of surgical scientists begins by attracting the best students into surgery and by providing a structured research curriculum with appropriate oversight. Senior surgical faculty need to become more active at the NIH and provide appropriate financial support and mentorship for residents and junior faculty engaged in research.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To examine factors influencing surgical research and assess the current state of training future surgical scientists. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The number of surgeons actively engaged in research seems to be decreasing. Training future surgical scientists to increase these numbers depends on a variety of factors that are constantly changing. Current trends at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and changes in graduate medical education make the training of the next generation of surgical scientists more challenging than ever. METHODS: Recent literature in surgical education, surgical research, and funding patterns at the NIH were reviewed. RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative deficiencies exist in surgical research. Although an increasing number of students are becoming interested in surgery, the burden of debt from medical school may preclude them from pursuing research during or after residency. Research training is complicated by the fact that no formal curriculum exists for training in research and oversight is lacking. Junior faculty face increased demands for clinical revenue, which decreases time for research. In addition, surgeons are less successful at obtaining NIH funding when compared with nonsurgeons and seem to be at a disadvantage. CONCLUSIONS: Development of the next generation of surgical scientists begins by attracting the best students into surgery and by providing a structured research curriculum with appropriate oversight. Senior surgical faculty need to become more active at the NIH and provide appropriate financial support and mentorship for residents and junior faculty engaged in research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42549170544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42549170544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318163d27d

DO - 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318163d27d

M3 - Review article

C2 - 18438110

AN - SCOPUS:42549170544

VL - 247

SP - 741

EP - 749

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 5

ER -