Towards international consensus on patient harm: perspectives on pressure injury policy

Debra Jackson, Marie Hutchinson, Susan Ann Barnason, William Li, Judy Mannix, Stephen Neville, Donella Piper, Tamara Power, Graeme D. Smith, Kim Usher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AIMS: To analyse influential policies that inform practice related to pressure injury management in Australia, England, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Scotland and the United States of America.

BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries are associated with significant harm to patients, and carry economic consequences for the health sector. Internationally, preventing and managing pressure injuries is a key nursing activity and quality indicator.

EVALUATION: Comparative review and synthesis of pressure injury policies that inform practice.

KEY ISSUES: The predominant focus of policy is on patient risk assessment, compliance with documentation and pressure relief. Financial penalty for institutions is emerging as a strategy where pressure injuries occur. Comparisons of prevalence rates are hampered by the lack of consensus on data collection and reporting. To date there has been little evaluation of policy implementation and implemented policy strategies, associated guidelines remain founded upon expert opinion and low-level evidence.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The pressure injury policy agenda has fostered a discourse of attention to incidents, compliance and penalty (sanctions). Prevention and intervention strategies are informed by technical and biomedical interpretations of patient risk and harm, with little attention given to the nature or design of nursing work. Considerable challenges remain if this policy agenda is successfully to eliminate pressure injury as a source of patient harm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)902-914
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of nursing management
Volume24
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Patient Harm
Pressure
Wounds and Injuries
Nursing
Policy Making
Expert Testimony
Scotland
Hong Kong
New Zealand
England
Documentation
Compliance
Research Design
Economics
Guidelines
Health

Keywords

  • nursing
  • patient harm
  • patient safety
  • policy analysis
  • pressure injury
  • pressure ulcer
  • regulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management

Cite this

Towards international consensus on patient harm : perspectives on pressure injury policy. / Jackson, Debra; Hutchinson, Marie; Barnason, Susan Ann; Li, William; Mannix, Judy; Neville, Stephen; Piper, Donella; Power, Tamara; Smith, Graeme D.; Usher, Kim.

In: Journal of nursing management, Vol. 24, No. 7, 01.10.2016, p. 902-914.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jackson, D, Hutchinson, M, Barnason, SA, Li, W, Mannix, J, Neville, S, Piper, D, Power, T, Smith, GD & Usher, K 2016, 'Towards international consensus on patient harm: perspectives on pressure injury policy', Journal of nursing management, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 902-914. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12396
Jackson, Debra ; Hutchinson, Marie ; Barnason, Susan Ann ; Li, William ; Mannix, Judy ; Neville, Stephen ; Piper, Donella ; Power, Tamara ; Smith, Graeme D. ; Usher, Kim. / Towards international consensus on patient harm : perspectives on pressure injury policy. In: Journal of nursing management. 2016 ; Vol. 24, No. 7. pp. 902-914.
@article{ff16420e903e4801993bb31911daed36,
title = "Towards international consensus on patient harm: perspectives on pressure injury policy",
abstract = "AIMS: To analyse influential policies that inform practice related to pressure injury management in Australia, England, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Scotland and the United States of America.BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries are associated with significant harm to patients, and carry economic consequences for the health sector. Internationally, preventing and managing pressure injuries is a key nursing activity and quality indicator.EVALUATION: Comparative review and synthesis of pressure injury policies that inform practice.KEY ISSUES: The predominant focus of policy is on patient risk assessment, compliance with documentation and pressure relief. Financial penalty for institutions is emerging as a strategy where pressure injuries occur. Comparisons of prevalence rates are hampered by the lack of consensus on data collection and reporting. To date there has been little evaluation of policy implementation and implemented policy strategies, associated guidelines remain founded upon expert opinion and low-level evidence.IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The pressure injury policy agenda has fostered a discourse of attention to incidents, compliance and penalty (sanctions). Prevention and intervention strategies are informed by technical and biomedical interpretations of patient risk and harm, with little attention given to the nature or design of nursing work. Considerable challenges remain if this policy agenda is successfully to eliminate pressure injury as a source of patient harm.",
keywords = "nursing, patient harm, patient safety, policy analysis, pressure injury, pressure ulcer, regulation",
author = "Debra Jackson and Marie Hutchinson and Barnason, {Susan Ann} and William Li and Judy Mannix and Stephen Neville and Donella Piper and Tamara Power and Smith, {Graeme D.} and Kim Usher",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jonm.12396",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "902--914",
journal = "Journal of Nursing Management",
issn = "0966-0429",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards international consensus on patient harm

T2 - perspectives on pressure injury policy

AU - Jackson, Debra

AU - Hutchinson, Marie

AU - Barnason, Susan Ann

AU - Li, William

AU - Mannix, Judy

AU - Neville, Stephen

AU - Piper, Donella

AU - Power, Tamara

AU - Smith, Graeme D.

AU - Usher, Kim

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - AIMS: To analyse influential policies that inform practice related to pressure injury management in Australia, England, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Scotland and the United States of America.BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries are associated with significant harm to patients, and carry economic consequences for the health sector. Internationally, preventing and managing pressure injuries is a key nursing activity and quality indicator.EVALUATION: Comparative review and synthesis of pressure injury policies that inform practice.KEY ISSUES: The predominant focus of policy is on patient risk assessment, compliance with documentation and pressure relief. Financial penalty for institutions is emerging as a strategy where pressure injuries occur. Comparisons of prevalence rates are hampered by the lack of consensus on data collection and reporting. To date there has been little evaluation of policy implementation and implemented policy strategies, associated guidelines remain founded upon expert opinion and low-level evidence.IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The pressure injury policy agenda has fostered a discourse of attention to incidents, compliance and penalty (sanctions). Prevention and intervention strategies are informed by technical and biomedical interpretations of patient risk and harm, with little attention given to the nature or design of nursing work. Considerable challenges remain if this policy agenda is successfully to eliminate pressure injury as a source of patient harm.

AB - AIMS: To analyse influential policies that inform practice related to pressure injury management in Australia, England, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Scotland and the United States of America.BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries are associated with significant harm to patients, and carry economic consequences for the health sector. Internationally, preventing and managing pressure injuries is a key nursing activity and quality indicator.EVALUATION: Comparative review and synthesis of pressure injury policies that inform practice.KEY ISSUES: The predominant focus of policy is on patient risk assessment, compliance with documentation and pressure relief. Financial penalty for institutions is emerging as a strategy where pressure injuries occur. Comparisons of prevalence rates are hampered by the lack of consensus on data collection and reporting. To date there has been little evaluation of policy implementation and implemented policy strategies, associated guidelines remain founded upon expert opinion and low-level evidence.IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The pressure injury policy agenda has fostered a discourse of attention to incidents, compliance and penalty (sanctions). Prevention and intervention strategies are informed by technical and biomedical interpretations of patient risk and harm, with little attention given to the nature or design of nursing work. Considerable challenges remain if this policy agenda is successfully to eliminate pressure injury as a source of patient harm.

KW - nursing

KW - patient harm

KW - patient safety

KW - policy analysis

KW - pressure injury

KW - pressure ulcer

KW - regulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028258781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028258781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jonm.12396

DO - 10.1111/jonm.12396

M3 - Article

C2 - 27213847

AN - SCOPUS:85028258781

VL - 24

SP - 902

EP - 914

JO - Journal of Nursing Management

JF - Journal of Nursing Management

SN - 0966-0429

IS - 7

ER -