Toward outcomes-based plastic surgery training: A needs assessment of recent graduates

Steven J. Kasten, Benjamin Levi, David Eng, Kimberly A. Schenarts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Outcomes Project mandates data-driven improvements to training programs. Few outcomes measures exist in plastic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine how well we presently train plastic surgery residents within the context of the council's competencies and how well those competencies are practiced after residency. Methods: Plastic surgery graduates from 2000 to 2005 were surveyed using a new questionnaire organized around the accreditation council's competencies. Scores from individual item responses were averaged to create a composite score reflecting the quality of training and practice of each competency. Composite scores were then compared using nonparametric analyses. Data regarding currently used assessment tools were also measured. Results: The response rate was 21 percent. The respondent sample was representative of current plastic surgeons. Overall, the competencies were considered important, with increasing awareness in more recent years. Practice-based learning and improvement appeared to be the best taught, and systems-based practice appeared to be the most poorly taught. There were differences between independent and integrated formats but they did not support one over the other. Women did not rate their training as highly as men did in some areas, and open comments suggested there were significant issues at some programs. Conclusions: Recent graduates view plastic surgery training as excellent. The competency domain in greatest need of attention is systems-based practice. We must broaden our use of assessment instruments for more valid results and investigate gender differences in our training programs. These results describe the outcomes of current plastic surgery training and serve as a needs assessment for improvement and as a baseline for future comparison.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1703-1710
Number of pages8
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume124
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009

Fingerprint

Needs Assessment
Plastic Surgery
Accreditation
Graduate Medical Education
Education
Internship and Residency
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Toward outcomes-based plastic surgery training : A needs assessment of recent graduates. / Kasten, Steven J.; Levi, Benjamin; Eng, David; Schenarts, Kimberly A.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 124, No. 5, 01.12.2009, p. 1703-1710.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{42fe6a3ef5dc48a186811cf28494a200,
title = "Toward outcomes-based plastic surgery training: A needs assessment of recent graduates",
abstract = "Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Outcomes Project mandates data-driven improvements to training programs. Few outcomes measures exist in plastic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine how well we presently train plastic surgery residents within the context of the council's competencies and how well those competencies are practiced after residency. Methods: Plastic surgery graduates from 2000 to 2005 were surveyed using a new questionnaire organized around the accreditation council's competencies. Scores from individual item responses were averaged to create a composite score reflecting the quality of training and practice of each competency. Composite scores were then compared using nonparametric analyses. Data regarding currently used assessment tools were also measured. Results: The response rate was 21 percent. The respondent sample was representative of current plastic surgeons. Overall, the competencies were considered important, with increasing awareness in more recent years. Practice-based learning and improvement appeared to be the best taught, and systems-based practice appeared to be the most poorly taught. There were differences between independent and integrated formats but they did not support one over the other. Women did not rate their training as highly as men did in some areas, and open comments suggested there were significant issues at some programs. Conclusions: Recent graduates view plastic surgery training as excellent. The competency domain in greatest need of attention is systems-based practice. We must broaden our use of assessment instruments for more valid results and investigate gender differences in our training programs. These results describe the outcomes of current plastic surgery training and serve as a needs assessment for improvement and as a baseline for future comparison.",
author = "Kasten, {Steven J.} and Benjamin Levi and David Eng and Schenarts, {Kimberly A.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b98c49",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "124",
pages = "1703--1710",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward outcomes-based plastic surgery training

T2 - A needs assessment of recent graduates

AU - Kasten, Steven J.

AU - Levi, Benjamin

AU - Eng, David

AU - Schenarts, Kimberly A.

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Outcomes Project mandates data-driven improvements to training programs. Few outcomes measures exist in plastic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine how well we presently train plastic surgery residents within the context of the council's competencies and how well those competencies are practiced after residency. Methods: Plastic surgery graduates from 2000 to 2005 were surveyed using a new questionnaire organized around the accreditation council's competencies. Scores from individual item responses were averaged to create a composite score reflecting the quality of training and practice of each competency. Composite scores were then compared using nonparametric analyses. Data regarding currently used assessment tools were also measured. Results: The response rate was 21 percent. The respondent sample was representative of current plastic surgeons. Overall, the competencies were considered important, with increasing awareness in more recent years. Practice-based learning and improvement appeared to be the best taught, and systems-based practice appeared to be the most poorly taught. There were differences between independent and integrated formats but they did not support one over the other. Women did not rate their training as highly as men did in some areas, and open comments suggested there were significant issues at some programs. Conclusions: Recent graduates view plastic surgery training as excellent. The competency domain in greatest need of attention is systems-based practice. We must broaden our use of assessment instruments for more valid results and investigate gender differences in our training programs. These results describe the outcomes of current plastic surgery training and serve as a needs assessment for improvement and as a baseline for future comparison.

AB - Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Outcomes Project mandates data-driven improvements to training programs. Few outcomes measures exist in plastic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine how well we presently train plastic surgery residents within the context of the council's competencies and how well those competencies are practiced after residency. Methods: Plastic surgery graduates from 2000 to 2005 were surveyed using a new questionnaire organized around the accreditation council's competencies. Scores from individual item responses were averaged to create a composite score reflecting the quality of training and practice of each competency. Composite scores were then compared using nonparametric analyses. Data regarding currently used assessment tools were also measured. Results: The response rate was 21 percent. The respondent sample was representative of current plastic surgeons. Overall, the competencies were considered important, with increasing awareness in more recent years. Practice-based learning and improvement appeared to be the best taught, and systems-based practice appeared to be the most poorly taught. There were differences between independent and integrated formats but they did not support one over the other. Women did not rate their training as highly as men did in some areas, and open comments suggested there were significant issues at some programs. Conclusions: Recent graduates view plastic surgery training as excellent. The competency domain in greatest need of attention is systems-based practice. We must broaden our use of assessment instruments for more valid results and investigate gender differences in our training programs. These results describe the outcomes of current plastic surgery training and serve as a needs assessment for improvement and as a baseline for future comparison.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73549098196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73549098196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b98c49

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b98c49

M3 - Article

C2 - 20009859

AN - SCOPUS:73549098196

VL - 124

SP - 1703

EP - 1710

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 5

ER -