Total fundoplication is the operation of choice for patients with gastroesophageal reflux and defective peristalsis

D. Oleynikov, T. R. Eubanks, B. K. Oelschlager, C. A. Pellegrini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Partial fundoplication has traditionally been indicated for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who have defective peristalsis (DP). Because partial fundoplication had been reported to be a less effective means of controlling acid reflux than total fundoplication, in 1997 we stopped performing partial fundoplication for patients with DP and switched to a floppy total fundoplication. This study analyzes the results of our new strategy and compares it to our former approach. Methods: We performed a partial fundoplication in 39 patients with DP (distal amplitude > 40% of swallows) between 1994 and 1997 and a total fundoplication in 57 patients between 1997 and 2000. Symptoms scores derived from a standard questionnaire with a scale of 0-4, manometry, and 24-h pH monitoring were completed preoperatively in 86 patients and postoperatively in 40 patients. Results: Heartburn scores improved in both groups (preoperative, 2.8; postoperative, 0.65; p < 0.05). Dysphagia was 1.1 preoperatively and 0.62 postoperatively (p=NS) in the partial fundoplication group and 1.2 preoperatively and 0.3 postoperatively (p < 0.05) in the total fundoplication group. Furthermore, none of the patients in the total fundoplication group developed new dysphagia and none required dilatation. Distal esophageal acid exposure normalized in both groups after operative treatment (median DeMeester score:72.3 vs 11.3, p < 0.05, For partial fundoplication; 57.1 vs 6.3, p < 0.05, For total fundoplication). Distal esophageal amplitudes averaged 27.8 mmHg preoperatively and 35.6 mmHg (p = NS) in the partial fundoplication group, they averaged 28.2 mmHg preoperatively vs 49.0 mmHg postoperatively (p < 0.005) in the total fundoplication group. Two patients with a previous partial fundoplication required a conversion to a total fundoplication. No postoperative dilation was required in either group. Conclusions: Our study shows that both a partial and a total fundoplication are effective in controlling the symptoms of GERD in patients with defective peristalsis. Dysphagia improves significantly after total fundoplication but not after partial fundoplication. Although both operations brought acid reflux to within normal limits, the effect was more pronounced with total fundoplication. Total, but not partial, fundoplication produced a significant increase in amplitude of esophageal peristalsis, which may explain the subjective improvement during deglution. Therefore, fundoplication should be the treatment of choice in patients with GERD and defective peristalsis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)909-913
Number of pages5
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Peristalsis
Fundoplication
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Deglutition Disorders
Acids
Dilatation

Keywords

  • Defective peristalsis
  • Dysphagia
  • Esophageal motility
  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
  • Partial fundoplication
  • Total fundoplication
  • Toupet fundoplication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Total fundoplication is the operation of choice for patients with gastroesophageal reflux and defective peristalsis. / Oleynikov, D.; Eubanks, T. R.; Oelschlager, B. K.; Pellegrini, C. A.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 16, No. 6, 01.01.2002, p. 909-913.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oleynikov, D. ; Eubanks, T. R. ; Oelschlager, B. K. ; Pellegrini, C. A. / Total fundoplication is the operation of choice for patients with gastroesophageal reflux and defective peristalsis. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2002 ; Vol. 16, No. 6. pp. 909-913.
@article{fcef873dbd954660ba884167153e69b9,
title = "Total fundoplication is the operation of choice for patients with gastroesophageal reflux and defective peristalsis",
abstract = "Background: Partial fundoplication has traditionally been indicated for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who have defective peristalsis (DP). Because partial fundoplication had been reported to be a less effective means of controlling acid reflux than total fundoplication, in 1997 we stopped performing partial fundoplication for patients with DP and switched to a floppy total fundoplication. This study analyzes the results of our new strategy and compares it to our former approach. Methods: We performed a partial fundoplication in 39 patients with DP (distal amplitude > 40{\%} of swallows) between 1994 and 1997 and a total fundoplication in 57 patients between 1997 and 2000. Symptoms scores derived from a standard questionnaire with a scale of 0-4, manometry, and 24-h pH monitoring were completed preoperatively in 86 patients and postoperatively in 40 patients. Results: Heartburn scores improved in both groups (preoperative, 2.8; postoperative, 0.65; p < 0.05). Dysphagia was 1.1 preoperatively and 0.62 postoperatively (p=NS) in the partial fundoplication group and 1.2 preoperatively and 0.3 postoperatively (p < 0.05) in the total fundoplication group. Furthermore, none of the patients in the total fundoplication group developed new dysphagia and none required dilatation. Distal esophageal acid exposure normalized in both groups after operative treatment (median DeMeester score:72.3 vs 11.3, p < 0.05, For partial fundoplication; 57.1 vs 6.3, p < 0.05, For total fundoplication). Distal esophageal amplitudes averaged 27.8 mmHg preoperatively and 35.6 mmHg (p = NS) in the partial fundoplication group, they averaged 28.2 mmHg preoperatively vs 49.0 mmHg postoperatively (p < 0.005) in the total fundoplication group. Two patients with a previous partial fundoplication required a conversion to a total fundoplication. No postoperative dilation was required in either group. Conclusions: Our study shows that both a partial and a total fundoplication are effective in controlling the symptoms of GERD in patients with defective peristalsis. Dysphagia improves significantly after total fundoplication but not after partial fundoplication. Although both operations brought acid reflux to within normal limits, the effect was more pronounced with total fundoplication. Total, but not partial, fundoplication produced a significant increase in amplitude of esophageal peristalsis, which may explain the subjective improvement during deglution. Therefore, fundoplication should be the treatment of choice in patients with GERD and defective peristalsis.",
keywords = "Defective peristalsis, Dysphagia, Esophageal motility, Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Partial fundoplication, Total fundoplication, Toupet fundoplication",
author = "D. Oleynikov and Eubanks, {T. R.} and Oelschlager, {B. K.} and Pellegrini, {C. A.}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-001-8327-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "909--913",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Total fundoplication is the operation of choice for patients with gastroesophageal reflux and defective peristalsis

AU - Oleynikov, D.

AU - Eubanks, T. R.

AU - Oelschlager, B. K.

AU - Pellegrini, C. A.

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Background: Partial fundoplication has traditionally been indicated for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who have defective peristalsis (DP). Because partial fundoplication had been reported to be a less effective means of controlling acid reflux than total fundoplication, in 1997 we stopped performing partial fundoplication for patients with DP and switched to a floppy total fundoplication. This study analyzes the results of our new strategy and compares it to our former approach. Methods: We performed a partial fundoplication in 39 patients with DP (distal amplitude > 40% of swallows) between 1994 and 1997 and a total fundoplication in 57 patients between 1997 and 2000. Symptoms scores derived from a standard questionnaire with a scale of 0-4, manometry, and 24-h pH monitoring were completed preoperatively in 86 patients and postoperatively in 40 patients. Results: Heartburn scores improved in both groups (preoperative, 2.8; postoperative, 0.65; p < 0.05). Dysphagia was 1.1 preoperatively and 0.62 postoperatively (p=NS) in the partial fundoplication group and 1.2 preoperatively and 0.3 postoperatively (p < 0.05) in the total fundoplication group. Furthermore, none of the patients in the total fundoplication group developed new dysphagia and none required dilatation. Distal esophageal acid exposure normalized in both groups after operative treatment (median DeMeester score:72.3 vs 11.3, p < 0.05, For partial fundoplication; 57.1 vs 6.3, p < 0.05, For total fundoplication). Distal esophageal amplitudes averaged 27.8 mmHg preoperatively and 35.6 mmHg (p = NS) in the partial fundoplication group, they averaged 28.2 mmHg preoperatively vs 49.0 mmHg postoperatively (p < 0.005) in the total fundoplication group. Two patients with a previous partial fundoplication required a conversion to a total fundoplication. No postoperative dilation was required in either group. Conclusions: Our study shows that both a partial and a total fundoplication are effective in controlling the symptoms of GERD in patients with defective peristalsis. Dysphagia improves significantly after total fundoplication but not after partial fundoplication. Although both operations brought acid reflux to within normal limits, the effect was more pronounced with total fundoplication. Total, but not partial, fundoplication produced a significant increase in amplitude of esophageal peristalsis, which may explain the subjective improvement during deglution. Therefore, fundoplication should be the treatment of choice in patients with GERD and defective peristalsis.

AB - Background: Partial fundoplication has traditionally been indicated for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who have defective peristalsis (DP). Because partial fundoplication had been reported to be a less effective means of controlling acid reflux than total fundoplication, in 1997 we stopped performing partial fundoplication for patients with DP and switched to a floppy total fundoplication. This study analyzes the results of our new strategy and compares it to our former approach. Methods: We performed a partial fundoplication in 39 patients with DP (distal amplitude > 40% of swallows) between 1994 and 1997 and a total fundoplication in 57 patients between 1997 and 2000. Symptoms scores derived from a standard questionnaire with a scale of 0-4, manometry, and 24-h pH monitoring were completed preoperatively in 86 patients and postoperatively in 40 patients. Results: Heartburn scores improved in both groups (preoperative, 2.8; postoperative, 0.65; p < 0.05). Dysphagia was 1.1 preoperatively and 0.62 postoperatively (p=NS) in the partial fundoplication group and 1.2 preoperatively and 0.3 postoperatively (p < 0.05) in the total fundoplication group. Furthermore, none of the patients in the total fundoplication group developed new dysphagia and none required dilatation. Distal esophageal acid exposure normalized in both groups after operative treatment (median DeMeester score:72.3 vs 11.3, p < 0.05, For partial fundoplication; 57.1 vs 6.3, p < 0.05, For total fundoplication). Distal esophageal amplitudes averaged 27.8 mmHg preoperatively and 35.6 mmHg (p = NS) in the partial fundoplication group, they averaged 28.2 mmHg preoperatively vs 49.0 mmHg postoperatively (p < 0.005) in the total fundoplication group. Two patients with a previous partial fundoplication required a conversion to a total fundoplication. No postoperative dilation was required in either group. Conclusions: Our study shows that both a partial and a total fundoplication are effective in controlling the symptoms of GERD in patients with defective peristalsis. Dysphagia improves significantly after total fundoplication but not after partial fundoplication. Although both operations brought acid reflux to within normal limits, the effect was more pronounced with total fundoplication. Total, but not partial, fundoplication produced a significant increase in amplitude of esophageal peristalsis, which may explain the subjective improvement during deglution. Therefore, fundoplication should be the treatment of choice in patients with GERD and defective peristalsis.

KW - Defective peristalsis

KW - Dysphagia

KW - Esophageal motility

KW - Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

KW - Partial fundoplication

KW - Total fundoplication

KW - Toupet fundoplication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036267706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036267706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-001-8327-z

DO - 10.1007/s00464-001-8327-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 12163953

AN - SCOPUS:0036267706

VL - 16

SP - 909

EP - 913

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 6

ER -