To exclose nests or not: Structured decision making for the conservation of a threatened species

Jonathan B. Cohen, Anne Hecht, Kelly F. Robinson, Erik E. Osnas, Andrew J. Tyre, Christina Davis, Alison Kocek, Brooke Maslo, Scott M. Melvin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Decisions regarding endangered species recovery often face sparse data and multiple sources of uncertainty about the effects of management. Structured decision making (SDM) provides a framework for assembling knowledge and expert opinion and evaluating the tradeoffs between different objectives while formally incorporating uncertainty. The Atlantic Coast piping plover provides an illustrative case for the utility of SDM in endangered species management because its population growth is simple to model, most populations are monitored, decision alternatives are well defined, and many managers are open to recovery recommendations. We built a model to evaluate the decision to use nest exclosures to protect piping plover eggs from predators, where the objective was to maximize λ and the tradeoff was between nest survival and adult survival. The latter can be reduced by exclosures. We used a novel mixed multinomial logistic exposure model to predict daily nest fates and incorporated the results into a stochastic projection matrix that included renesting after nest failure, and adult mortality associated with abandonment. In our test data set (n = 329 nests from 28 sites over four years), the mean nest survival over 34 days was markedly higher for exclosed nests (0.76 ± 0.03 SE) than for unexclosed nests (0.37 ± 0.07). Abandonment rates were also higher for exclosed nests (0.092 ± 0.017) than for unexclosed nests (0.045 ± 0.017), but the difference was not statistically significant and the loss rate to "other sources" (mostly predators) was much lower for exclosed nests (0.15 ± 0.03) than for unexclosed nests (0.58 ± 0.07). Population growth rate (λ) was clearly improved by exclosure use at the sites with high background nest loss rates, but λ was still <1 with exclosure use. Where the background nest loss rates were low, the decision to use exclosures was ambiguous, and λ could benefit from reducing uncertainty in vital rates. Our process demonstrated that geographic and temporal variation in nest mortality determines whether exclosures will be useful in attaining positive population growth rates and that other management options must be considered where the background nest mortality rates are high.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere01499
JournalEcosphere
Volume7
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2016

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Endangered species
  • Nest exclosures
  • Nest survival
  • Piping plover
  • Population model
  • Structured decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Cite this

Cohen, J. B., Hecht, A., Robinson, K. F., Osnas, E. E., Tyre, A. J., Davis, C., ... Melvin, S. M. (2016). To exclose nests or not: Structured decision making for the conservation of a threatened species. Ecosphere, 7(10), [e01499]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1499