Through the eyes of the beholder: Simulated eye-movement experience ("SEE") modulates valence bias in response to emotional ambiguity.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Although some facial expressions provide clear information about people's emotions and intentions (happy, angry), others (surprise) are ambiguous because they can signal both positive (e.g., surprise party) and negative outcomes (e.g., witnessing an accident). Without a clarifying context, surprise is interpreted as positive by some and negative by others, and this valence bias is stable across time. When compared to fearful expressions, which are consistently rated as negative, surprise and fear share similar morphological features (e.g., widened eyes) primarily in the upper part of the face. Recently, we demonstrated that the valence bias was associated with a specific pattern of eye movements (positive bias associated with faster fixation to the lower part of the face). In this follow-up, we identified two participants from our previous study who had the most positive and most negative valence bias. We used their eye movements to create a moving window such that new participants viewed faces through the eyes of one our previous participants (subjects saw only the areas of the face that were directly fixated by the original participants in the exact order they were fixated; i.e., Simulated Eye-movement Experience). The input provided by these windows modulated the valence ratings of surprise, but not fear faces. These findings suggest there are meaningful individual differences in how people process faces, and that these differences impact our emotional perceptions. Furthermore, this study is unique in its approach to examining individual differences in emotion by creating a new methodology adapted from those used primarily in the vision/attention domain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1122-1127
Number of pages6
JournalEmotion
Volume18
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Eye Movements
Individuality
Fear
Emotions
Facial Expression
Accidents

Keywords

  • ambiguity
  • emotion
  • gaze
  • individual differences
  • simulated eye-movement experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{f2ea5489eb9d46528d204026f9bc8811,
title = "Through the eyes of the beholder: Simulated eye-movement experience ({"}SEE{"}) modulates valence bias in response to emotional ambiguity.",
abstract = "Although some facial expressions provide clear information about people's emotions and intentions (happy, angry), others (surprise) are ambiguous because they can signal both positive (e.g., surprise party) and negative outcomes (e.g., witnessing an accident). Without a clarifying context, surprise is interpreted as positive by some and negative by others, and this valence bias is stable across time. When compared to fearful expressions, which are consistently rated as negative, surprise and fear share similar morphological features (e.g., widened eyes) primarily in the upper part of the face. Recently, we demonstrated that the valence bias was associated with a specific pattern of eye movements (positive bias associated with faster fixation to the lower part of the face). In this follow-up, we identified two participants from our previous study who had the most positive and most negative valence bias. We used their eye movements to create a moving window such that new participants viewed faces through the eyes of one our previous participants (subjects saw only the areas of the face that were directly fixated by the original participants in the exact order they were fixated; i.e., Simulated Eye-movement Experience). The input provided by these windows modulated the valence ratings of surprise, but not fear faces. These findings suggest there are meaningful individual differences in how people process faces, and that these differences impact our emotional perceptions. Furthermore, this study is unique in its approach to examining individual differences in emotion by creating a new methodology adapted from those used primarily in the vision/attention domain.",
keywords = "ambiguity, emotion, gaze, individual differences, simulated eye-movement experience",
author = "Maital Neta and Dodd, {Michael D}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1037/emo0000421",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "1122--1127",
journal = "Emotion",
issn = "1528-3542",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Through the eyes of the beholder

T2 - Simulated eye-movement experience ("SEE") modulates valence bias in response to emotional ambiguity.

AU - Neta, Maital

AU - Dodd, Michael D

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - Although some facial expressions provide clear information about people's emotions and intentions (happy, angry), others (surprise) are ambiguous because they can signal both positive (e.g., surprise party) and negative outcomes (e.g., witnessing an accident). Without a clarifying context, surprise is interpreted as positive by some and negative by others, and this valence bias is stable across time. When compared to fearful expressions, which are consistently rated as negative, surprise and fear share similar morphological features (e.g., widened eyes) primarily in the upper part of the face. Recently, we demonstrated that the valence bias was associated with a specific pattern of eye movements (positive bias associated with faster fixation to the lower part of the face). In this follow-up, we identified two participants from our previous study who had the most positive and most negative valence bias. We used their eye movements to create a moving window such that new participants viewed faces through the eyes of one our previous participants (subjects saw only the areas of the face that were directly fixated by the original participants in the exact order they were fixated; i.e., Simulated Eye-movement Experience). The input provided by these windows modulated the valence ratings of surprise, but not fear faces. These findings suggest there are meaningful individual differences in how people process faces, and that these differences impact our emotional perceptions. Furthermore, this study is unique in its approach to examining individual differences in emotion by creating a new methodology adapted from those used primarily in the vision/attention domain.

AB - Although some facial expressions provide clear information about people's emotions and intentions (happy, angry), others (surprise) are ambiguous because they can signal both positive (e.g., surprise party) and negative outcomes (e.g., witnessing an accident). Without a clarifying context, surprise is interpreted as positive by some and negative by others, and this valence bias is stable across time. When compared to fearful expressions, which are consistently rated as negative, surprise and fear share similar morphological features (e.g., widened eyes) primarily in the upper part of the face. Recently, we demonstrated that the valence bias was associated with a specific pattern of eye movements (positive bias associated with faster fixation to the lower part of the face). In this follow-up, we identified two participants from our previous study who had the most positive and most negative valence bias. We used their eye movements to create a moving window such that new participants viewed faces through the eyes of one our previous participants (subjects saw only the areas of the face that were directly fixated by the original participants in the exact order they were fixated; i.e., Simulated Eye-movement Experience). The input provided by these windows modulated the valence ratings of surprise, but not fear faces. These findings suggest there are meaningful individual differences in how people process faces, and that these differences impact our emotional perceptions. Furthermore, this study is unique in its approach to examining individual differences in emotion by creating a new methodology adapted from those used primarily in the vision/attention domain.

KW - ambiguity

KW - emotion

KW - gaze

KW - individual differences

KW - simulated eye-movement experience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041175502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041175502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/emo0000421

DO - 10.1037/emo0000421

M3 - Article

C2 - 29389209

AN - SCOPUS:85041175502

VL - 18

SP - 1122

EP - 1127

JO - Emotion

JF - Emotion

SN - 1528-3542

IS - 8

ER -