The Verdict Is In: Judge and Administrator Perceptions of State Court Governance

Christopher D. Kimbrough, Mitchel N. Herian, David B. Rottman, Brian H Bornstein, Alan J. Tomkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The court unification movement has progressed in fits and starts over the decades. Recent proposals have been put forth that attempt to continue the move toward a state court structure that utilizes a more coherent approach to governance. Drawing on a survey of court personnel who were asked about a set of proposed governance principles, this article examines how state court judges and administrators view their roles and responsibilities in the court system, the current need for court reform, the importance of future trends, and whether they are confident in the performance of their respective court system. Three hundred and seventy-five judges and administrators answered sixty-two questions regarding principles governing state court procedures and measures of their confidence in the court system. Participants overwhelmingly agreed that changes in court governance are necessary, although the degree of change for specific principles and trends was moderated by career, age, and time working for the courts. Results indicate that perceptions of court performance are not uniform among court professionals, perhaps signifying that current court governance emphases should be reexamined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)344-361
Number of pages18
JournalJustice System Journal
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2014

Fingerprint

governance
trend
performance
personnel
confidence
career
reform
responsibility

Keywords

  • court organization
  • court reform
  • court standards
  • unification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

The Verdict Is In : Judge and Administrator Perceptions of State Court Governance. / Kimbrough, Christopher D.; Herian, Mitchel N.; Rottman, David B.; Bornstein, Brian H; Tomkins, Alan J.

In: Justice System Journal, Vol. 35, No. 4, 02.10.2014, p. 344-361.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kimbrough, Christopher D. ; Herian, Mitchel N. ; Rottman, David B. ; Bornstein, Brian H ; Tomkins, Alan J. / The Verdict Is In : Judge and Administrator Perceptions of State Court Governance. In: Justice System Journal. 2014 ; Vol. 35, No. 4. pp. 344-361.
@article{1594b869d33e4273a10589e911740916,
title = "The Verdict Is In: Judge and Administrator Perceptions of State Court Governance",
abstract = "The court unification movement has progressed in fits and starts over the decades. Recent proposals have been put forth that attempt to continue the move toward a state court structure that utilizes a more coherent approach to governance. Drawing on a survey of court personnel who were asked about a set of proposed governance principles, this article examines how state court judges and administrators view their roles and responsibilities in the court system, the current need for court reform, the importance of future trends, and whether they are confident in the performance of their respective court system. Three hundred and seventy-five judges and administrators answered sixty-two questions regarding principles governing state court procedures and measures of their confidence in the court system. Participants overwhelmingly agreed that changes in court governance are necessary, although the degree of change for specific principles and trends was moderated by career, age, and time working for the courts. Results indicate that perceptions of court performance are not uniform among court professionals, perhaps signifying that current court governance emphases should be reexamined.",
keywords = "court organization, court reform, court standards, unification",
author = "Kimbrough, {Christopher D.} and Herian, {Mitchel N.} and Rottman, {David B.} and Bornstein, {Brian H} and Tomkins, {Alan J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/0098261X.2014.920650",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "344--361",
journal = "Justice System Journal",
issn = "0098-261X",
publisher = "National Center for State Courts",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Verdict Is In

T2 - Judge and Administrator Perceptions of State Court Governance

AU - Kimbrough, Christopher D.

AU - Herian, Mitchel N.

AU - Rottman, David B.

AU - Bornstein, Brian H

AU - Tomkins, Alan J.

PY - 2014/10/2

Y1 - 2014/10/2

N2 - The court unification movement has progressed in fits and starts over the decades. Recent proposals have been put forth that attempt to continue the move toward a state court structure that utilizes a more coherent approach to governance. Drawing on a survey of court personnel who were asked about a set of proposed governance principles, this article examines how state court judges and administrators view their roles and responsibilities in the court system, the current need for court reform, the importance of future trends, and whether they are confident in the performance of their respective court system. Three hundred and seventy-five judges and administrators answered sixty-two questions regarding principles governing state court procedures and measures of their confidence in the court system. Participants overwhelmingly agreed that changes in court governance are necessary, although the degree of change for specific principles and trends was moderated by career, age, and time working for the courts. Results indicate that perceptions of court performance are not uniform among court professionals, perhaps signifying that current court governance emphases should be reexamined.

AB - The court unification movement has progressed in fits and starts over the decades. Recent proposals have been put forth that attempt to continue the move toward a state court structure that utilizes a more coherent approach to governance. Drawing on a survey of court personnel who were asked about a set of proposed governance principles, this article examines how state court judges and administrators view their roles and responsibilities in the court system, the current need for court reform, the importance of future trends, and whether they are confident in the performance of their respective court system. Three hundred and seventy-five judges and administrators answered sixty-two questions regarding principles governing state court procedures and measures of their confidence in the court system. Participants overwhelmingly agreed that changes in court governance are necessary, although the degree of change for specific principles and trends was moderated by career, age, and time working for the courts. Results indicate that perceptions of court performance are not uniform among court professionals, perhaps signifying that current court governance emphases should be reexamined.

KW - court organization

KW - court reform

KW - court standards

KW - unification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938861414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938861414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0098261X.2014.920650

DO - 10.1080/0098261X.2014.920650

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84938861414

VL - 35

SP - 344

EP - 361

JO - Justice System Journal

JF - Justice System Journal

SN - 0098-261X

IS - 4

ER -